Strengthening the Governance of the International Monetary Fund: How a Dual Board Structure Could Raise the Effectiveness and Legitimacy of a Key Global Institution

Thimann, Christian and Just, Christian and Ritter, Raymond (2009): Strengthening the Governance of the International Monetary Fund: How a Dual Board Structure Could Raise the Effectiveness and Legitimacy of a Key Global Institution. Published in: Global Governance , Vol. 15, No. 2 (April 2009): pp. 187-193.

Abstract

After having been at the helm of the international monetary system for decades, the International Monetary Fund was sidelined in policy debates in the past few years. One reason for the IMF not having taken a more central role in addressing key global policy issues in recent years relates to its internal governance. This paper focuses specifically on the structure and functioning of the Executive Board. The paper argues that Executive Board, although uniquely placed to provide authoritative guidance to IMF member countries, exert peer pressure and give economic policy advice, is overwhelmed by its tasks and responsibilities and too large to be an effective forum for true international economic dialogue. The paper makes the point that the highly diverse tasks of the IMF require different governance structures in order to be implemented effectively. We believe that the optimal number of governing bodies for the ongoing IMF work is not one, but that it is two, duly distinguishing between multilateral matters from country-related matters. Specifically, we propose to split the tasks that are predominantly systemic in nature from those that are predominantly country-focused and technical and believe that this can be done. Two different Boards would be dealing with these issues: a Systemic Issues Board and a Country Issues Board. The paper also discusses how such a dual board structure could be implemented in practice.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: IMF; Governance
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F0 - General > F02 - International Economic Order and Integration; F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance > F33 - International Monetary Arrangements and Institutions

References

L. van Houtven (2004), Rethinking IMF governance, Finance and Development, September, pp. 18-20;

M. Kahler (2006), Internal Governance and IMF Performance, in: E. Truman (ed.), Reforming the IMF for the 21st Century, Institute for International Economics, Washington DC, pp. 257-270

P. B. Kenen, J. R. Shafer, N. L. Wicks, and C. Wyplosz (2004), International Economic and Financial Cooperation: New Issues, New Actors, New Responses, Geneva Reports on the Global Economy 6, International Centre for Monetary and Banking Studies, Geneva

E. Truman (2006), A Strategy for IMF Reform, Institute for International Economics, Washington DC).

L. Bini Smaghi (2005), IMF Governance and the Political Economy of a Consolidated European Seat, in: E. Truman (ed.), Reforming the IMF for the 21st Century. Institute for International Economics, Special Report no 19).

P. Kenen (2006), IMF Reform: Comments on the Address of the Managing Director of the IMF at the book release meeting for Reforming the IMF for the 21st Century, Institute for International Economics, Washington DC.

P. Evans and M. Finnemore (2001), Organizational reform and the expansion of the South’s voice at the Fund, Washington DC.

M. King (2006), Through the Looking Glass: Reform of the International Institutions, Speech at the Melbourne Centre for Financial Studies, Australia (December)

D. Dodge (2006), The Evolving International Monetary Order and the Need for an Evolving IMF, Speech at Princeton University (March)).

IMF (1999), External Evaluation of IMF Surveillance – Report by a Group of Independent Experts, EBAP/99/86, IMF, Washington DC.