Orkodashvili, Mariam (2008): In Disputatione Nascitur Veritas.
Download (112kB) | Preview
Centrality and fragility of university in the long-lasting debates over the functions of higher education and its role in the interplay of wider socioeconomic, political and cultural forces is an ever recurrent issue. It seems that exactly these debates called for constant public attention towards academia and helped retain its core function of knowledge production through the dynamics of controversies and disputations.The essay attempts to discuss the main issues regarding the features and functions of university. It also tries to identify the challenges that the University of the Future will face. The main argument that the essay makes is that through constant search for the truth, through continuous discussions and „disputations‟, the university should retain its core function that is the production of knowledge. The continuous struggles between academic, sociocultural, political and economic forces have always helped academia to preserve its unique character. The essay adheres to the well-known belief that truth is born in constant discussions and „disputations‟ (in disputatione nascitur veritas).
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||In Disputatione Nascitur Veritas|
|Keywords:||production of knowledge; curriculum; commodification of knowledge; power struggles; cultural values; university of excellence|
|Subjects:||A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics > A23 - Graduate
A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A12 - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines
I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I21 - Analysis of Education
A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A14 - Sociology of Economics
|Depositing User:||Mariam Orkodashvili|
|Date Deposited:||23. Jul 2009 06:12|
|Last Modified:||11. Jan 2014 05:29|
AAUP Statement of Principles (1915). http://www.akronaaup.org/documents/AAUP1915.pdf
Bloom, A. (1987). The closing of the American mind. How higher education has failed democracy and impoverished the souls of today’s students. Simon and Schuster, New York.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. In M. J. Adler (Ed-in-Chief) (1990) Great Books of the Western World. Philosophy and religion: selections from the twentieth century, v.55, Encyclodaedia Britannica, INC., pp. 99-125.
D‟Souza, D. (1991). Illiberal education. The politics of race and sex on campus. The Free Press, New York.
Hunter, J. D. (1991). Culture wars: the struggle to define America. Basic Books, Harper Collins Publishers. Hutchins, R. M. (1935). The higher learning in America. Chicago, 1935. http://www.ditext.com/hutchins/hutch0.html
Kerr, C. (2001). The uses of the university. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Lemann, N. (2000). The big test: the secret history of the American meritocracy. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Lucas, C. (2006). American higher education. A history, Second Edition. Palgrave, Macmillan.
Miller, C. et al., (2006). A test of leadership: charting the future of U.S. Higher Education, Washington: U.S Department of Education. http://www.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/hiedfuture/reports/final-report.pdf
Newfield, C. (2008). Unmaking the Public University. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England.
Port Huron Statement (1962). http://www3.iath.virginia.edu/sixties/HTML_docs/Resources/Primary/Manifestos?SDS_Port_Huron.html
Reactions to the Spellings Commission Report. (2006). Commentary. http://www.highereducation.org/crosstalk/ct0406/Spellings.pdf
Readings, B. (1996). The university in ruins. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, England.
Roherty, B. M. (1997). The price of passive resistance in financing higher education. In P. M. Callan and J. E. Finney with K. R. Bracco and W. R. Doyle (Eds.) (1997). Public and private financing of higher education. Shaping public policy for the future. American Council on Education. ORYX Press, Series on Higher Education, pp. 3 – 29.
Rossinow, D. (2002). Mario Savio and the politics of authenticity. In R. Cohen and R. Zelnik (Eds.) (2002) Free Speech Movement: Reflections on Berkeley in the 1960s, Berkeley, pp.533-551.
The Harvard College Charter of 1650. http://hul.harvard.edu/huarc/charter.html
The Yale Report (1828). http://www.higher-ed.org/resources/Yale_Report.htm Thelin, J. R. (2004). A history of American higher education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
Tomasky, M. (1996). Left for dead: the life, death, and possible resurrection of progressive politics in America. The Free press, New York.
Veysey, L. R. (1965). The emergence of the American University. The University of Chicago Press. Washington, B. T. (1895). Atlanta compromise. http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/39
W.E.B Du Bois (1903). The talented tenth. http://www.yale.edu/glc/archive/1148.htm
Zemsky, R., Shaman, S., Shapiro, D. B. (2001). Higher education as competitive enterprise: when markets matter. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Zemsky, R., Wegner, G. R., Massy, W. F. (2005). Remaking the American university: market-smart and mission-centered. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ.