Mino, Kazuo (2006): Voracity vs. Scale Effect in a Growing Economy.
Download (137kB) | Preview
This paper extends the standard model of growth with insecure property rights by introducing variable labor supply and increasing returns to scale. It is assumed that capital stock is jointly owned by multiple interest groups and that each group participates production activities by supplying its labor force. In this setting, there are two opposing factors that affect growth: over consumption in the absence of secure property rights and the scale effect due to the presence of increasing returns. The growth performance of the economy thus depends on which factor dominates.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Voracity vs. Scale Effect in a Growing Economy|
|Keywords:||common property, growth, increasing returns, endogenous labor supply, differential game|
|Subjects:||O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O43 - Institutions and Growth
O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O40 - General
|Depositing User:||Kazuo Mino|
|Date Deposited:||29. Aug 2009 23:41|
|Last Modified:||15. Feb 2013 13:11|
Benhabib, J. and Farmer, R. 1994, Indeterminacy and growth, Journal of Economic Theory 63, 19-41.
Lindner, I. and Strulik, H., 2002, Property rights and growth, unpublished manuscript, Department of Economics, University of Hamberg.
Pelloni, A. and Waldmann, R. 1998, Stability properties of a growth model, Economics Letters 61, 55-60.
Tornell, A. and Lane, P.R. 1998, Are windfalls a curse?: a non-representative agent model of the current account, Journal of International Economics 44, 83-112.
Tornell, A. and Lane, P.R. 1999, The voracity effect, American Economic Review 89, 22-46.
Tornell, A. and Velasco, A. 1992, "Why Does Capital Flow from Poor to Rich Countries?: the tragedy of the commons and economic growth, Journal of Political Economy 100, 1208-1231.