Inequality in workers’ lifelong learning across european countries: Evidence from EU-SILC data-set

Biagetti, Marco and Scicchitano, Sergio (2009): Inequality in workers’ lifelong learning across european countries: Evidence from EU-SILC data-set.

Abstract

The primary purpose of this paper is to explore the potential for EU-SILC data to deepen our understanding of the determinants of inequality in workers’ formal life-long learning (LLL) in Europe. In particular we investigate the incidence of personal, job-specific and firm-specific characteristics on the workers’ probability to undertake adult learning. To do so, we first estimate LLL incidence in the whole sample for men and women. Then we estimate separate 21 country-specific equations, for both sexes. This method allows to investigate cross-country gender differences and avoid unobserved heteroscedasticity due to sex, which we clearly find in the data. For the whole sample the results show that, for both men and women, formal LLL incidence is significantly higher among young, better educated, part-time and temporary workers, and lower among those who changed current job in the last year, employed in small firms and having low-skilled occupations. Furthermore, some gender differences for the whole sample emerge. When estimating separate equations for each country and for both sexes, a significant cross-country heterogeneity and a weaker significance of the coefficients come to light. In particular, a couple of relevant results emerge for Scandinavian countries with regard to the complementarity between past level of education and current adult learning. Finland is the only country in the sample in which, for both men and women, less educated workers are more likely to undertake formal LLL, thus making adult learning system able to avoid, for both men and women, existing inequality in human capital, as it results from education levels. Denmark is the only country where, for women, being less educated turns out to be the predictor with the greatest significant magnitude of the effect in the variation of the probability.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: education, training, lifelong learning, human capital, inequality, Europe
• Subjects: J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J4 - Particular Labor Markets > J40 - General; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J24 - Human Capital ; Skills ; Occupational Choice ; Labor Productivity

References

Allison, Paul. 1999. “Comparing Logit and Probit Coefficients Across Groups.” Sociological Methods and Research 28(2): 186-208.

Alvarez, R. Michael and John Brehm. 1995. “American Ambivalence Towards Abortion Policy: Development of a Heteroskedastic Probit Model of Competing Values." American Journal of Political Science 39:1055-1082.

Ariga, K. and Brunello, G. (2006), Are More Educated Receiving More Training? Evidence from Thailand, Industrial and Labour Relations Review, 2006, 59 (4), 613-629

Arulampalam, W., Booth, A. and Bryan, M. (2004), Training in Europe, Journal of the European Economic Association, 2 (2-3), pp. 346-360.

Asplund, R. (2004), The Provision and Effects of Company Training: A brief review of the literature, ETLA Discussion Paper no. 907

Bassanini A. (2004), Improving Skills for More and Better Jobs? The Quest for Efficient Policies to Promote Adult Education and Training, presented at the Conference on Quality and Efficiency in Education, Brussels, May.

Bassanini, A. Booth, A. L., Brunello, G., De Paola, M. and Leuven, E., (2007) Workplace Training in Europe, in: Brunello, Garibaldi and Wasmer (eds.), Education and Training in Europe, Oxford University Press, 2007, Ch. 8 - 13

Brunello, G. (2003), On the Complementarity between Education and Training in Europe, in Checchi and Lucifora, (eds.), Education, Training and Labour Market Outcomes in Europe, Palgrave, McMillan.

Brunello G. and Medio A. (2001), An Explanation of International Differences in Education and Workplace Training, European Economic Review, vol.1, pp.307-322.

Carneiro, P. and Heckman, J. J., (2003) "Human Capital Policy," IZA Discussion Papers 821, Institute for the Study of Labour (IZA).

Drewes, T. (2008) Adult Education and Training from a Longitudinal Perspective, Trent University, march 2008

EUROSTAT (2005), The continuity of indicators during the transition between ECHP and EU-SILC

Jenkins, A., Vignoles, A., Wolf, A., Galindo-Rueda, F. (2002) The determinants and effects of lifelong learning. CEEDP, 19. Centre for the Economics of Education, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK. Long, J. Scott and Jeremy Freese. 2006. “Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata, Second Edition.” College Station, Texas: Stata Press.

OECD (1999), Employment Outlook, Paris.

OECD (2001), The Economics and Finance of Lifelong Learning, Paris.

OECD (2007), Qualifications Systems. Bridges to Lifelong Learning, Paris.

Ok W. and Tergeist, P. (2003), Improving Workers’ Skills: Analytical Evidence and the Role of the Social Partners, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers. Sargant, N., Field J., Francis, H., Schuller, T. and Tuckett, A. (1997), The Learning Divide: A Study of Participation in Adult Learning in the United Kingdom, NIACE.

Simonsen, M. e Skipper, L. (2008) The Incidence and Intensity of Formal Lifelong Learning, Economics Working Papers 2008-07, School of Economics and Management, University of Aarhus.

Yatchew, A. and Z. Griliches (1985) “Specification Error In Probit Models." Review of Economics and Statistics 18:134-139.

Williams R. 2009. “Using Heterogeneous Choice Models to Compare Logit and Probit Coefficients across Groups”.