Levent, Korap (2009): Enflasyon ve enflasyon belirsizliği ilişkisi için G7 ekonomileri üzerine bir inceleme. Published in: Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi , Vol. 8, No. 2 (2009): pp. 503-523.
Download (503kB) | Preview
The relationships between inflation and its uncertainty have long been perceived in the economics literature as a special research area based mainly on empirical findings. Testing the causality between these aggregates enables us to attain the significant knowledgement of whether or not inflation and its associated volatility tend to have potential negative effects on the growth process of the economy. Based on a contemporaneous literature, in this paper, some main approaches dealing with the causality issues between inflation and inflation uncertainty have been documented, and then, the empirical validity of these competing approaches has been tested for the G7 countries with monthly frequency observations in the 1973M01 - 2008M09 period. To test the causal relationships between inflation and inflation uncertainty, a proxy variable for inflation uncertainty represented by conditional volatility of inflation is first generated by using contemporaneous generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (EGARCH) methods. The use of a GARCH-type model enables us to estimate time-varying measures of inflation uncertainty, and this will be appropriate for an empirical attempt aiming at directly testing the implications of the hypotheses examined in this paper. Following the construction of uncertainty component of inflation, some conventional bivariate Granger-causality tests have been tried to be conducted to examine the causality between inflation and inflation uncertainty. Estimation results reveal that in a way supporting the arguments put forward by Friedman-Ball hypotheses, inflation is the Granger-cause of the inflation uncertainty considering a positive relationship. However, no clear-cut evidence for the positive causality running from inflationary uncertainty to inflation explained mainly by Cukierman-Meltzer hypotheses can be found for all the G7 countries in the sense that such an inference seems to be supported in some countries, the sign of this relationship varies in some others, and no causalityhas been found in still others. All in all, we infer that inflation is a cause of an associated uncertainty component related to itself occured in the economy.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Enflasyon ve enflasyon belirsizliği ilişkisi için G7 ekonomileri üzerine bir inceleme|
|English Title:||An investigation for the inflation and inflation uncertainty relationship upon the G7 economies|
|Keywords:||Enflasyon ; Enflasyon belirsizliği ; G7 ekonomileri ;|
|Subjects:||C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C51 - Model Construction and Estimation
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C32 - Time-Series Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes ; State Space Models
E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles > E31 - Price Level ; Inflation ; Deflation
|Depositing User:||Levent Korap|
|Date Deposited:||21. Dec 2009 16:01|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 16:17|
Apergis, N. (2004), “Inflation Output Growth, Volatility, and Causality: Evidence from Panel Data and the G7 Countries”, Economics Letters, 83, 185-91.
Ball, L. ve Cecchetti, S.G. (1990), “Inflation and Uncertainty at Short and Long Horizons”, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 215-54.
Ball, L. (1992), “Why Does Higher Inflation Raise Inflation Uncertainty?”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 29, 371-78.
Bollerslev, T. (1986), “Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity”, Journal of Econometrics, 31, 307-27.
Bollerslev, T. ve Wooldridge, J.M. (1992), “Quasi-maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference in Dynamic Models with Time Varying Covariances”, Econometric Reviews, 11, 143-72.
Caporale, T. ve McKiernan, B. (1997), “High and Variable Inflation: Further Evidence on the Friedman Hypothesis”, Economics Letters, 54, 65-8.
Cukierman, A. (1992), Central Bank Strategy,Ccredibility, and Independence, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Cukierman, A. ve Meltzer, A. (1986), “A Theory of Ambiguity, Credibility, and Inflation under Discretion and Asymmetric Information”, Econometrica, 54, September, 1099-128.
Daal, E., Naka, A. ve Sanchez, B. (2005), “Re-examining Inflation and Inflation Uncertainty in Developed and Emerging Countries”, Economics Letters, 89, 180-86.
Devereux, M. (1989), “A Positive Theory of Inflation and Inflation Variance”, Economic Inquiry, 27, January, 105-16.
Enders, W. (2004), Applied Econometric Time Series, Wiley&Suns, Inc.
Engle, R.F. (1982), “Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of U.K. Inflation”, Econometrica, 50, 987-1008.
Engle, R.F., Lilien, D.M. ve Robins, R.P.(1987), “Estimating Time Varying Risk Premia in the Term Structure: The ARCH-M Model”, Econometrica, 55, 391–407.
Fountas, S. (2001), “The Relationship between Inflation and Inflation Uncertainty in the UK: 1885-1998”, Economics Letters, 74, 77-83.
Friedman, M. (1977), “Nobel Lecture: Inflation and Unemployment”, Journal of Political Economy, 85/3, 451-72.
Göktaş, Ö. (2005), Teorik ve Uygulamalı Zaman Serileri Analizi, İstanbul: Beşir Kitabevi.
Grier, K.B. ve Perry, M.J. (1998), “On Inflation and Inflation Uncertainty in the G7 countries”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 17/4, 671-89.
Grier, K.B. ve Perry, M.J. (2000), “The Effects of Real and Nominal Uncertainty on Inflation and Output Growth: Some Garch-M Evidence”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 15/1, 45-58.
Henry, Ó.T., Olekalns, N. ve Suardi, S. (2007), “Testing for Rate Dependence and Asymmetry in Inflation Uncertainty: Evidence from the G7 Economies”, Economics Letters, 94, 383-88.
Holland, A.S. (1995), “Inflation and Uncertainty: Tests for Temporal Ordering”, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 27/3, 827-37.
Hwang, Y. (2001), “Relationship between Inflation Rate and Inflation Uncertainty”, Economics Letters, 73, 179-86.
Kontonikas, A. (2004), “Inflation and Inflation Uncertainty in the United Kingdom, Evidence from GARCH Modelling”, Economic Modelling, 21, 525-43.
Nas, T.F. ve Perry, M.J. (2000), “Inflation, Inflation uncertainty, and Monetary policy in Turkey: 1960-1998”, Contemporary Economic Policy, 18/2, 170-80.
Nelson, D.B. (1991), “Conditional Heteroskedasticity in Asset Returns: A New Approach”, Econometrica, 59/2, 347-70.
Okun, A. (1971), “The Mirage of Steady Inflation”, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 485-98.
Perron, P. (1989), “The Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock, and the Unit Root Hypothesis”, Econometrica, 57, 1361-1401.
Wilson, B.K. (2006), “The Links between Inflation, Inflation Uncertainty and Output Growth: New Time Series Evidence from Japan”, Journal of Macroeconomics, 28, 206-20.
Zivot, E. ve Andrews, D.W.K. (1992), “Further Evidence of Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock and the Unit Root Hypothesis”, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 10, 251-70.