Detotto, Claudio and Pulina, Manuela (2010): Assessing substitution and complementary effects amongst crime typologies.
Download (191kB) | Preview
This paper aims at assessing how offenders allocate their effort amongst several crime typologies. Specifically, complementary and substitution effects are tested amongst number of recorded crimes. Furthermore, the extent to which crime is detrimental for economic growth is also tested. The case study is Italy and the time span under analysis is from 1981:1 up to 2004:4. A Vector Autoregressive Correction Mechanism (VECM) is employed after having assessed the integration and cointegration status of the variables under investigation. The main findings are that a bi-directional complementary effect exists between drug related crimes and receiving, whereas a bi-directional substitution effect is detected between robberies, extortions and kidnapping and homicides and falsity, respectively. Furthermore, economic growth produces a positive effect on the growth of homicides, receiving and drug related crimes; while, the growth in robberies, extortion and kidnapping and falsity have a crowding-out effect on economic growth.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Assessing substitution and complementary effects amongst crime typologies|
|Keywords:||Crime; substitution and complementary effect; economic growth; crowding-out effect|
|Subjects:||C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C32 - Time-Series Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes ; State Space Models
E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E24 - Employment ; Unemployment ; Wages ; Intergenerational Income Distribution ; Aggregate Human Capital ; Aggregate Labor Productivity
K - Law and Economics > K1 - Basic Areas of Law > K14 - Criminal Law
|Depositing User:||claudio detotto|
|Date Deposited:||18. Jan 2010 10:28|
|Last Modified:||09. Jan 2014 00:23|
Becker, G.S. (1968) Crime and punishment: an economic approach, Journal of Political Economy, 76, 169-217.
Bolton, P. (2001) Social Indicators, House of Commons Library, Research Paper 01/83.
Cameron, S. (1987) Substitution between offence categories in the supply of property crime: Some new evidence, International Journal of Social Economics, 14, 48-60.
Chen, S.W. (2009) Investigating causality among unemployment, income and crime in Taiwan: evidence from the bounds test approach, Journal of Chinese Economics and Business Studies, 7, 115-125.
Confesercenti (2008) SOS Impresa. XI Rapporto, Roma, Confesercenti.
Detotto, C., Vannini, M. (2009) “Counting the cost of crime in Italy.” Workshop on Applied analyses of crime: Implications for cost-effective criminal justice policies, PortoConteRicerche, Italy, 26 October 2009.
Enders, W., Sandler, T. (1993) The effectiveness of antiterrorism policies: A vector-autoregression-intervention analysis, American Political Science Review, 7, 829-844.
Engle, R.F. and Granger, C.W.J. (1987) Cointegration and error correction: Representation, estimation and testing, Econometrica, 55, 251-276.
Garratt, A., Lee, K., Pesaran H. and Shin Y. (2003) A long run structural macroeconometric model of the UK, The Economic Journal, 133, 412-455.
Habibullah, M.S., Baharom, A.H. (2009) Crime and economic conditions in Malaysia, International Journal of Social Economics, 36, 1071-1081
Hakim, S., Spiegel, U., Weinblatt, J. (1984) Substitution, size effects, and the composition of property crime, Social Science Quarterly, 65, 719-734
Hendry, D.F., Mizon, G.E. (1998) Exogeneity, causality, and co-breaking in economic policy analysis of a small econometric model of money in the UK, Empirical Economics, 23, 267-294.
Holtmann, A.G., Yap L. (1978) Does punishment pay?, Public Finance, 33, 90-97.
Jantzen, R. (2008) Dynamics of New York City crime, The 66th International Atlantic Economic Conference (IAES), Montréal, Canada.
Johansen, S. (1988) Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12, 231-254.
Johansen, S. (1995) Likelihood Based Inference in Cointegrated Vector Autoregressive Models, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Koskela, E., Viren, M. (1997) An occupational choice model of crime switching, Applied Economics, 1997, 29, 655- 660
Masih, A.M.M., Masih, R., (1996) Temporal causality and the dynamics of different categories of crime and their socioeconomic determinants: evidence from Australia, Applied Economics, 28, 1093-1104.
Mizon, G.E. (1996), Progressive Modelling of Macroeconomic Time Series - The LSE Methodology, Ch. 4 in Hoover, K.D. (ed) Macroeconometrics, California, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Narayan, P.K., Smyth, R. (2004) Crime rates, male youth unemployment and real income in Australia: evidence from Granger causality tests, Applied Economics, 36, 2079-2095.
Pindyck, R.S., and Rubinfeld, D.L. (1991) Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts, Singapore, International Editions.
Available Versions of this Item
- Assessing substitution and complementary effects amongst crime typologies. (deposited 18. Jan 2010 10:28) [Currently Displayed]