Lógicas de argumentación e instituciones internacionales

Fernando, Estrada (2010): Lógicas de argumentación e instituciones internacionales.

Abstract

This article presents the basics of argumentation theory. The relations of the argument with the concept of logical inference and an illustration of argument in international comparative policy analysis: the analysis of arguments in the invasion of Iraq

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: Logic of argumentation and international institutions
• Language: Spanish
• Keywords: Argumentation, logic default, international institutions, Iraq
• Subjects: N - Economic History > N4 - Government, War, Law, International Relations, and Regulation > N45 - Asia including Middle East; A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics; F - International Economics > F5 - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy > F51 - International Conflicts ; Negotiations ; Sanctions; A - General Economics and Teaching > A3 - Collective Works; D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making; F - International Economics > F5 - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy; D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D74 - Conflict ; Conflict Resolution ; Alliances ; Revolutions; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty; N - Economic History > N4 - Government, War, Law, International Relations, and Regulation

References

[Aus62] Austin, John, L., How to Do Things with Words, Clarendon Press, Oxford., (trad. Española de G. Carrió y E. Rabossi, Cómo hacer cosas con palabras, Paidós, Buenos Aires, 1971; Searle J., Speech Acts, Cambridge, University Press Cambridge, 1969. (trad. Española, Actos de Habla, Editorial Cátedra, Madrid, 1989.) ; Expresión and Meaning, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1979.

[BHM00] Beckert, B., Hänle, R.- y Manya, F. The sat problem of signed cnf formulas. En Labelled Deduction, D. Basin, M.D´Agostino, D. Gabbay, S. Mattews, y L. Vignano, Editores. Kluwer Academia Publisher, 2000, pp. 1-22.

[Brat.1987] M.E.Bratman, Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, M.A, 1987.

[Bre91a] Brewka, G. Cumulative defeault logic in defence of nonmonotonic inference rules. Artificial Intelligence 50, 2 (1991), 183 – 205.

[CRL00] Carbogim, D., Roberson, D., Y Lee,J. Argument-based applications to Knowdledge enginering. The Knowledge Enginering, Review 2000. Este trabajo ofrece una visión panorámica sobre distintas aplicaciones basadas en argumentos para la resolución de problemas de ingenierías.

[Estr, 2001, 2004, 2006b] Estrada Gallego Fernando, 2001. “La Retórica del Paramilitarismo”. Revista Análisis Político. Bogotá: v.44, p.39 – 57; Estrada Gallego Fernando, 2004, Las Metáforas de una Guerra Perpetua. Pragmática del discurso en el conflicto armado colombiano, Medellín Colombia: Fondo Editorial Universidad EAFIT, (Segunda reimpresión diciembre de 2004); Estrada Gallego Fernando, 2006b,, “Rumor e información. Estrategias por el poder local”. Revista SEMANA. Bogotá Colombia.

[Gar97] García, A-J., Programación en lógica rebatible: su definición (msc thesis). Tesis de Maestría. Departamento de Cs. De la Computación Universidad Nacional del Sur, Bahía Blanca, Argentina, Julio de 1997.

[Gab96] Gabbay, D. Labelling Deductive Systems (vol.1) Oxford University Press (Volume 33 of Oxford Logia Guides, 1996.

[Gom94,Mon98] Gómez, Adolfo L., El primado de la razón práctica, Cali, Universidad del Valle, 1994; Monsalve, Alfonso, La teoría de la argumentación, Medellín, Universidad de Antioquia, 1995.

[KaMo, 2002] Karacapildis N., and P. Moraitis. Engineering issues in inter-agent dialogues. Proc. of 15th European Conference on Artificial Intelligent (ECAI 02), Lyon, France, 2002.

[KC93] Krause, P., Clark, D. Representing uncertain knowledge: an artificial intelligence approach. Intellect Books, Oxford, 1993.

[KoPenrod, 2003] Peter J. van Koppen and Steven D. Penrod, Adversarial or inquisitorial: comparing systems. In: Peter J. van Koppen and Steven D.

[Lou87] Loui, R.P., Defeat among Argument: A System of Defeasible Inference. Computational Intelligence 3, 3 (1987).

[Lou91] Loui, R.P., Ampliative inference, computation and dialectic. En A rtificial Intelligence and Philosophy, R. Cummins y J. Pollok, Editores, 1991.

[Mal07] Maldonado, C. Comprensión positiva de las lógicas no clásicas, Revista Zero, Universidad Externado de Colombia, 18, 160-164, 2007.

[McMa80] McCarthy, J. Circumscription – A form of Non–monotonic Reasoning, Artificial Intelligence 13 (1980), 1-18.

[Moo85] Mcore R., J., Semantical considerations on non-monotonic logia. Artificial Intelligence 25 (1985), 272-279.

[Mod98] Modgil, S. A Labelled System for Practical reasoning. Tesis PhD Imperial College, London, Diciembre 1998.

[ParSie, 1998] S. Parsons, C. Sierra and N.R. Jennings, Agents that reason and negotiate by arguying. Logic and Computation 8 3 (1998), pp. 261–292.

Penrod, Editors, Adversarial versus Inquisitorial Justice, Kluwer, New York (2003), pp. 1–19.

[PS95] Prakken, H., y Sartor, G. A system for defeasible argumentation with defeasible priorities. En Workshop on Computational Dialectics. Formal and Applied Practical Reasoning (FAPR) Bonn, Alemania, 1993

[Rey 80] Reyter, R. A Logic for Defeault Reasoning, Artificial Intelligence 13, 1, 2 (April 1980), 81-132.

[PS97] Prakken, H., Sartor, G., Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities. Journal of Applied Non-classical Logics 7 (1997), 25-75.

[Pol95] Pollok, J.L., Cognitive Carpentry: A Blueprint for How to Build a Person, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1995.

[PV99] Prakken, H., y Vreeswijk, G. Logics for Defeasible Argumentation. En Handbook of Philosophical Logic, D. Gabbay, Ed. Kluwer Academic Publisher, 1999.

[RaoGeo, 1991] A. Rao and M. Georgeff, Modeling rational agents within BDI architecture. In: Proceedings 2nd International Conference of Knowledge Representation, Cambridge, MA, , Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA , 1991, pp. 473–484.

[Rus96] Russo, A. Modal labelled Deductive System. Tesis PhD, Imperial College, London, UK, 1996. Russo

[SL92] Simari,G.R., y Loui, R.P. A Mathematical Treatment of Defeasible Reasoning and its Implementation. Artificial Intelligence 53 (1992), 125-157;

[SCG94] Simari, G.R., Chesñevar, C.I., The role of dialecticas in defeasible argumentation, anales de la XIV Conferencia Internacional de la Sociedad Chilena para Ciencias de la Computación (Noviembre 1994), Universidad de Concepción, Concepción (Chile).

[Ver93] Vreeswijk, G.A., Studies in Defeasible Argumentation. Tesis PhD. Vrije University, Amsterdam (Holanda), 1993;