Vulnerability and Coping to Disasters: A Study of Household Behaviour in Flood Prone Region of India

Patnaik, Unmesh and Narayanan, K (2010): Vulnerability and Coping to Disasters: A Study of Household Behaviour in Flood Prone Region of India.

Abstract

Disaster risk is a major concern in a developing country like India as people living in disaster prone regions of the country are subject to variety of risks concerning their livelihoods. Preliminary assessments reveal that the severity and intensity of floods in various parts of India might increase due to climate change. This paper attempts to understand the various risks faced by households living in disaster prone regions of rural India and specifically examine the effectiveness of coping mechanisms adopted by households living in these areas to hedge against the risks. The study area (districts of eastern Uttar Pradesh, India) is highly susceptible to floods with a major flood occurring every ten years and smaller ones happening every one-two years. The data is drawn from primary household surveys undertaken in the study area for flood affected households. The analysis is carried out using a risk sharing and self insurance framework and econometric modeling is carried out using binary outcomes and multivariate probit estimation through GHK (Geweke- Hajivassiliou- Keane) estimator. Based on the empirical analysis, and subject to the assumptions and the usual limitations of data used, the findings of the study suggest that: (i) overall the impacts of disasters on the consumption level of the household exhibit an inverse relationship, (ii) consumption smoothening behaviour is not exhibited by the households and (iii) household specific characteristics along with the geographical location of the households have no significant role to play with respect to the changes in consumption in the flood prone districts of eastern Uttar Pradesh.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Vulnerability, Coping, Disasters, Flood, Household Behaviour
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C12 - Hypothesis Testing: General; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C8 - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology ; Computer Programs > C81 - Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Microeconomic Data ; Data Access; D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q54 - Climate ; Natural Disasters and Their Management ; Global Warming; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C0 - General > C01 - Econometrics

References

Attanasio, O. and G. Weber (1993), “Consumption Growth, the Interest Rate and Aggregation,” Review of Economic Studies, 60, No.3, pp. 631–649.

Cochrane, John H. (1991), “A Simple Test of Consumption Insurance" Journal of Political Economy, Volume 99, No. 5, pp. 957-976.

Deaton, A. (1991), “Saving and Liquidity Constraints”, Econometrica, 59, No. 5, pp. 1221-1248.

IPCC (2001a), The Scientific Basis, Contribution of the Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds. Hougthon, J.T., Y. Ding, D.J. Griggs, M. Noguer, P.J. van der Linden, X. Dai, K. Maskell and C.A. Johnson), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

IPCC (2001b), Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, A Contribution of the Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds. McCarthy, J.J., O.F. Canziani, N.A. Leary, D.J. Dokken and K.S. White), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Kavikumar K.S and J. Parikh (2001), Indian Agriculture and Climate Sensitivity, Global Environmental Change, 11, (2), pp. 147-154.

Kavikumar, K. S. (2002), Vulnerability and Adaptation of Agriculture and Coastal Resources in India to Climate Change, EERC Working Paper Series: NIP 4. Available at: http://coe.mse.ac.in/eercrep/fullrep/nip/NIP_FR_KaviKumar.pdf

Ljungqvist, L. and T. J. Sargent, (2000), Recursive Macroeconomic Theory, MIT Press, Cambridge.

Mace, B. J. (1991), “Full Insurance in the Presence of Aggregate Uncertainty”, Journal of Political Economy 99, No.5), pp. 928-96.

Moench, M., Fajber, E., Dixit, A., Caspari, E., and Pokhrel, A. (2008), “Catalyzing Climate and Disaster Resilience: Processes for Identifying Tangible and Economically Robust Strategies”, Eds., Final Report of the Risk to Resilience Study, The Risk to Resilience Study Team, pp 328

NATCOM (2004), India’s Initial National Communication to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, New Delhi.available at: http://www.natcomindia.org/natcomreport.htm

Roy J, A. Ghosh, A. Majumdar, P. Roy, A.P. Mitra and C. Sharma, (2005), Socio-economic and physical perspectives of water related vulnerability to climate change: results of field study in India, Science and Culture 71, (8), pp. 239–259.

Sawada, Y. (2006). “The Impact of Natural and Manmade Disasters on Household Welfare”, Discussion Paper No. 148, Graduate School of International Development, Nagoya University Japan.

Sawada, Y. and S. Shimizutani, (2007), "Consumption Insurance against Natural Disasters: Evidence from the Great Hanshin-Awaji (Kobe) Earthquake." Applied Economics Letters, Volume 14, No. 4, pp. 303-306.

Townsend, R. M. (1994), “Risk and Insurance in Village India” Econometrica, Volume 62, pp. 539-591. Zeldes, S. P. (1989), “Consumption and Liquidity Constraints: An Empirical Investigation”, The Journal of Political Economy 97, No. 2, pp. 305-346.