Mancebón-Torrubia, María-Jesús and Calero, Jorge and Choi, Álvaro and Ximénez-de-Embún, Domingo Pérez (2010): Efficiency of public and publicly-subsidized high schools in Spain. Evidence from PISA 2006.
This is the latest version of this item.
Download (126kB) | Preview
The purpose of this paper is to compare the efficiency of Spanish public and publicly-subsidized private high schools by Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), employing the results provided by a hierarchical linear model (HLM) applied to PISA-2006 (Programme for International Students Assessment) microdata. The study places special emphasis on the estimation of the determinants of school outcomes, the educational production function being estimated through an HLM that takes into account the nested nature of PISA data. Inefficiencies are then measured through DEA and decomposed into two types: managerial (related to individual performance), and program (related to structural differences between management models), following the approach adopted by Silva Portela & Thanassoulis (2001). Once differences in students’ background, school resources and individual management inefficiencies are removed, the results reveal that Spanish public high schools are more efficient than their publicly-subsidized private equivalents.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Efficiency of public and publicly-subsidized high schools in Spain. Evidence from PISA 2006|
|Keywords:||Efficiency; educational finance; resource allocation; PISA|
|Subjects:||I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I21 - Analysis of Education
I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I28 - Government Policy
I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I22 - Educational Finance ; Financial Aid
|Depositing User:||Domingo Pérez Ximénez-de-Embún|
|Date Deposited:||30 Apr 2010 02:21|
|Last Modified:||25 Feb 2016 20:24|
Abburrà, L. (2005). As good as the others. Northern Italian students and their peers in other European regions. Istituto Ricerche Economico Sociali del Piemonte. November.
Alchian, A.A. (1950). Uncertainty, evolution and economic theory. Journal of Political Economy, 58, 211-221.
Banker, R., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W.W. (1984). Models for estimating technical and scale efficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30, 1078-1092.
Barbetta, G.P., & Turati, G. (2003). Efficiency of junior high schools and the role of proprietary structure. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 74 (4), 529-551.
Bedi, A.S., & Garg, A. (2000). The effectiveness of private versus public schools: the case of Indonesia. Journal of Development Economics, 61, 463- 494.
Bessent, A.M., & Bessent, E.W. (1980). Determining the comparative efficiency of schools through data envelopment analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 16 (2), 57-75.
Bettinger, E.P. (2005). The effect of charter schools on charter students and public schools. Economics of Education Review, 24, 133-147.
Braun, H., Jenkins, F., & Grigg, W. (2006). Comparing private schools and public schools using hierarchical linear modeling. Report 2006-461. Washington DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
Bryk, A.S., & Raudenbusch, S.W. (1988). Toward a More Appropriate Conceptualization of Research on School Effects: A Three-Level Hierarchical Linear Model. American Journal of Education, 97 (1), 65-108.
Calero, J., & Escardíbul, J.O. (2007). Evaluación de servicios educativos: el rendimiento en los centros públicos y privados medido en PISA-2003. Hacienda Pública Española, 183 (4), 33-66.
Calero, J., & Waisgrais, S. (2009). Factores de desigualdad en la educación española. Una aproximación a través de las evaluaciones de PISA. Papeles de Economía Española, 119, 86-99.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W., & Rhodes, E. (1981). Evaluating program and managerial efficiency: an application of data envelopment analysis to program follow through. Management Science, 27 (6), 668-697.
Cherchye, L., De Witte, K., Ooghe, E., & Nicaise, I. (2010). Efficiency and equity in private and public education: A nonparametric comparison. European Journal of Operational Research, 202, 563-573.
Chiswick, B.R., & Debburman, N. (2004). Educational attainment: analysis by immigrant generation. Economics of Education Review, 23, 361-379.
Chubb, J.E., & Moe, T.M. (1990). Politics, Markets and American Schools. Washington DC: Brookings Institution.
Coleman, J., Campbell, E., Hobson, C., McPartland, J., Mood, A., Weinfeld, F., & York, R. (1966). Equality of Educational Opportunity. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Coleman, J., Hoffer, T., & Kilgore, S. (1982). Secondary school achievement. Public, catholic and private schools compared. New York: Basic Books, Inc. Publishers.
Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M., & Zhu, J. (2004a). Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis. New York: Springer.
Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M., & Zhu, J. (2004 b). Data envelopment analysis. Massachusetts: Kluwer.
Corten, R., & Dronkers, J. (2006). School Achievement of Pupils From the Lower Strata in Public, Private Government-Dependent and Private Government-Independent Schools: A cross-national test of the Coleman-Hoffer thesis. Educational Research and Evaluation, 2, 179-208.
Dronkers, J. (2008). Education as backbone of inequality- European education policy: constraints and possibilities. In F. Becker, K. Duffek, & T. Mörschell (eds.), Social Democracy and Education. The European Experience, 50-135. Berlin: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.
Dronkers, J., & Robert, P. (2008). Differences in scholastic achievement of public, private government-dependent and private independent schools. A cross-national analysis. Educational Policy, 22 (4), 541-577.
Echols, F.H., & Willms, J.D. (1995). Reasons for school choice in Scotland. Journal of Education Policy, 10 (2), 143-156.
Farley, J. (2006). School Integration and Its Consequences for Social Integration and Educational Opportunity. In F. Heckmann & R. Wolf (eds.), Immigrant Integration and Education. The Role of State and Civil Society in Germany and the US, 56-67. Bamberg: EFMS.
Fertig, M. (2003). Who’s to Blame? The Determinants of German Students’ Achievement in the PISA 2000 Study. IZA Discussion Paper Series, 739.
Figlio, D.N. & Stone, J.A. (1997). School choice and student performance. Are private schools really better? Institute for Research on Poverty Discussion Paper, 1141-97. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Friedman, M. & Friedman, R. (1981). Free to choose. New York: Avon.
Gamoran, A. (2001). American schooling and educational inequality: A forecast for the 21st century. Sociology of Education, 74, 135-153.
Gamoran, A. (2004). Classroom organization and instructional quality. In H.J. Walberg, A.J. Reynolds, & M.C. Wang (eds.), Can unlike students learn together? Grade retention, tracking and grouping, 141-155. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Glennerster, H. (1991). Quasi-markets for education? The Economic Journal, 101, 1268-1276.
Goldhaber, D.D. (1996). Public and private secondary schools. Is school choice an answer to the productivity problem? Economics of Education Review, 15 (2), 93-109.
Greene, K.V., & Kang, B. (2004). The effect of public and private competition on high school outputs in New York State. Economics of Education Review, 23, 497-506.
Hanushek, E.A. (1986). The economics of schooling: production and efficiency in public schools. Journal of Economic Literature, 24, 1141-1177.
Hanushek, E.A. (1997). School resources and student performance. In G. Burtless (ed.), Does money matter?, 43-73. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Hanushek, E.A. (2003). The Failure of Input-Based Schooling Policies. The Economic Journal, 113, 64-98.
Hanushek, E.A., Kain, J.F., Markman, J.M., & Rivkin, S.G. (2003). Does peer ability affect student achievement? Journal of Applied Econometrics, 18 (5), 527-544.
Hox, J. (1995). Applied Multilevel Analysis. Amsterdam: TT-Publikaties.
Jiménez, E., Lockheed, M.E., & Paqueo, V. (1991). The relative efficiency of private and public schools in developing countries. The World Bank Research Observer, 6 (2), 205-218.
Kao, G., & Tienda, M. (1995). “Optimism and achievement: the educational performance of immigrant youth.” Social Science Quarterly, 76 (1), 1-19.
Kang, C. (2007). Classroom peer effects and academic achievement: Quasi-randomization evidence from South Korea. Journal of Urban Economics, 61 (3), 458-495.
Kirjavainen, T., & Loikkanen, H. (1998). Efficiency differences of Finnish senior secondary schools: an application of DEA and Tobit analysis. Economics of Education Review, 17 (4), 377-394.
Lee, V., Croninger, R.G., & Smith, J.B. (1996). Equity and choice in Detroit. In B. Fuller & R. Elmore (eds.), Who chooses, who loses?, 70-91. New York: Teachers College Press.
Levin, H. (1976). Concepts of economic efficiency and educational production. In J.T. Froomkin & R. Radner (eds.). Education as an industry, 149-190. Cambridge: Ballenger Publishing Company.
Lubienski, C., Weitzel, P., & Lubienski, S.T. (2009). Is there a “consensus” on school choice and achievement? Educational Policy, 23 (1), 161-193.
Lubienski, S.T., & Lubienski, C. (2006). School sector and academic achievement: a multilevel analysis of NAEP mathematics data. American Educational Research Journal, 43 (4), 651-698.
Mancebón, M.J. & Bandrés, E. (1999). Efficiency evaluation in secondary schools: the key role of model specification and of ex post analysis of results. Education Economics, 7 (2), 131-152.
Mancebón, M. J., & Muñiz, M. A. (2003). Aspectos clave de la evaluación de la eficiencia productiva en la educación secundaria. Papeles de Economía Española, 95, 162-187.
Mancebón, M. J., & Muñiz, M. A. (2008). Public High Schools in Spain. Disentangling managerial and program efficiencies. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59, 892-901.
Marks, G. (2005). Accounting for immigrant non-immigrant differences in reading and mathematics in twenty countries. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28 (5), 925-946.
Meunier, M. (2008). Are Swiss secondary schools efficient? In N.C. Soguel and P. Jaccard (eds.). Governance and Performance of Education Systems, 187-202. Dordrecht: Springer.
Mizzala, A., Romaguera, P., & Farren, D. (2002). The technical efficiency of schools in Chile. Applied Economics, 34, 1533-1552.
Neal, D. (1997). The effects of catholic secondary schooling on educational achievement. Journal of Labor Economics, 15 (1), 98-123.
O’Donogue, M. (1971). Economic Dimensions in Education. London, UK: Gill and Macmillan Publishers.
OECD. (2006). Where immigrant students succeed. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2007). PISA-2006 Science Competencies for Tomorrow's World, 1 (analysis). Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2009a). PISA Data Analysis Manual. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2009b). PISA-2006 Technical report. Paris: OECD.
Opdenakker, M.C., & Van Damme, J. (2006). Differences between secondary schools: A study about school context, group composition, school practice, and school effects with special attention to public and Catholic schools and types of schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17 (1), 87-117.
Perelman, S., & Santin, D. (2008). Measuring educational efficiency at student level with parametric stochastic distance functions: an application to Spanish PISA results. Education Economics. DOI: 10.1080/09645290802470475.
Peterson, P. (1990). The public schools: monopoly or choice. In W. Clune & J.F. Witte (eds.). Choice and Control in American Education, 1, 47-78. Philadelphia: The Falmer Press.
Pincus, J. (1974). Incentives for innovation in the public schools. Review of Educational Research, 44 (1), 113- 144.
Rong, X., & Grant, L. (1992). Ethnicity, generation, and school attainment of Asians, Hispanics and Non-Hispanic Whites. The Sociological Quarterly, 33 (4), 625-636.
Rumberger, R.W., & Larson, K.A. (1998). Towards explaining differences in educational achievement among Mexican American and language-minority students. Sociology of Education, 71 (1), 68-92.
Sander, W. (1996). Catholic grade schools and academic achievement. Journal of Human Resources, 31 (3), 540-548.
Schnepf, V.S. (2008). Inequality of Learning amongst Immigrant Children in Industrialised Countries. IZA Discussion Paper, 3337.
Silva Portela, M.C., & Thanassoulis, E. (2001). Decomposing school and school-type efficiency. European Journal of Operational Research, 132, 357-373.
Sirin, S.R. (2005). Socioeconomic Status and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Review of Research. Review of Educational Research, 75 (3), 417-453.
Somers, M-A., McEwan, P.J., & Willms, J.D. (2004). How Effective Are Private Schools in Latin America? Comparative Education Review, 48 (1), 48-69.
Stevans, L.K., & Sessions, D.N. (2000). Private/public school choice and student performance revisited. Education Economics, 8 (2), 169-184.
Thanassoulis, E. (2001). Introduction to the Theory and Application of Data Envelopment Analysis. Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Tiebout, C.M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416-424.
Willms, J.D. (2006). Learning divides: Ten policy questions about the performance and equity of schools and schooling systems. UIS Working Paper, 5. Montreal: Unesco Institute for Statistics.
Woessmann, L. (2003). Schooling resources, educational institutions and student performance: the international evidence. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 65 (2), 117-170.
Worthington, A. (2001). An empirical survey of frontier efficiency measurement techniques in education. Education Economics, 9 (3), 245-268.
Available Versions of this Item
Efficiency of public and publicly-subsidised high schools in Spain. Evidence from PISA 2006. (deposited 07 Mar 2010 04:37)
- Efficiency of public and publicly-subsidized high schools in Spain. Evidence from PISA 2006. (deposited 30 Apr 2010 02:21) [Currently Displayed]