Kolesnikova, Irina (2010): State Aid for Industrial Enterprises in Belarus: Remedy or Poison?
Download (472kB) | Preview
In this paper the impact of various types of state aid on aggregate productivity growth in Belarusian manufacturing is investigated by combining the data on government support with firm-level accounting data for period 1998-2007. Obtained results indicate that the state aid provided for restructuring truly leads to the modernization of the enterprises (capital-to-labor ratio grows), that this modernization leads to an increase in effectiveness (TFP grows, especially at large enterprises), and that this growth of TFP allows the newly restructured enterprises to raise their market share which results in the growth of the allocative efficiency. However, when the state aid is provided to support enterprises in financial distress, while it leads to an increase in employment (only for enterprises receiving aid, especially for large enterprises, but not for the total sample) and to an expansion in the market share of large enterprises (not small and medium size), this achievement comes at the expense of the decrease in TFP.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||State Aid for Industrial Enterprises in Belarus: Remedy or Poison?|
|English Title:||State Aid for Industrial Enterprises in Belarus: Remedy or Poison?|
|Keywords:||State aid; total factor productivity; allocative efficiency; Arellano-Bond method.|
|Subjects:||C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C13 - Estimation: General
O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O2 - Development Planning and Policy > O25 - Industrial Policy
O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O49 - Other
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C33 - Panel Data Models ; Spatio-temporal Models
L - Industrial Organization > L5 - Regulation and Industrial Policy > L53 - Enterprise Policy
|Depositing User:||Irina Kolesnikova|
|Date Deposited:||30. Apr 2010 11:08|
|Last Modified:||16. Mar 2015 15:33|
Aghion, P., Bessonova E., 2006. On Entry and Growth: Theory and Evidence. Revue OFCE, June, 2006.
Aitken, B., and Harrison, A. (1999). Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Direct Foreign Investment? Evidence from Venezuela, American Economic Review, 89, 3, 605–618.
Arnold, J. (2005). Productivity Estimation at the Plant Level: A Practical Guide. Mimeo.
Bartelsman, E., Haltiwanger, J. and Scarpetta, S., 2006. Cross Country Differences in Productivity: The Role of Allocative Efficiency. Draft: December 28, 2006
Beason, R., Weinstein, D.E., 1996. Growth, Economies of Scale and Targeting in Japan (1955–1990). Review of Economics and Statistics 78, 286–295.
Bergstrom, F., 2000. Capital Subsidies and the Performance of Firms. Small Business Economics 14, 183–193.
Blundell, R., Bond, S., 1999. GMM Estimation with Persistent Panel Data: an Application to Production Functions. The Institute for Fiscal Studies. Working Paper series no. w 99/4.
Bond, S.,2002. Dynamic Panel Data Models: A Guide to Micro Data Methods and Practice. The Institute for Fiscal Studies Department of Economics, Working Paper cwp09/02.
Caballero, R. and Hammour, M., 2000. Institutions, Restructuring and Macroeconomic Performance. Working Paper 7720, NBER, May 2000.
Caliendo, M. and Hujer, H., 2005. The Microeconometric Estimation of Treatment Effects - An Overview. Discussion Paper 1653, IZA, July 2005.
Collie, D.,2000. State Aid in European Union: The Prohibition of Subsidies in an Integrated Market, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 18(2000).
Davis,J., Haltiwanger, J. and Schuh, S. 1996. Job Creation and Destruction. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1996
Escribano, A. and Guasch, J., 2004. Assessing the Impact of the Investment Climate on Productivity Using Firm-Level Data: Methodology and the Cases of Guatemala, Honduras and Nicaragua. Mimeo.
Everaert G.M.M, 2003. The Political Economy of Restructuring and Subsidization: An International Perspective. LICOS Discussion Paper 130, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium.
Foreman-Peck, J., 2007. Industrial Policy s Innovation Policy, IFRI Conference on Europe in Global Innovation-Based Competition, 16 January, 2007, Paris.
Haltiwanger C. and Schweiger, H., 2005. Allocative Efficiency and the Business Climate. Mimeo.
Harris, R., Robinson, C. (2004). Industrial Policy in Great Britain and its Effect on Total Factor Productivity in Manufacturing Plants, 1990–1998. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 51, 528–543.
Foster L., Haltiwanger, J. and Krizan, C., 2001. Aggregate Productivity Growth: Lessons from Microeconomic Evidence. In Edward Dean, Michael Harper, and Charles Hulten, editors, New Developments in Productivity Analysis. University of Chicago Press.
Girma , S., Gorg , H., Strob, E., 2006. a. The Effect of Government Grants on Plant Level Productivity, Economics Letters (2006), doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2006.09.003.
b. The Effects of Government Grants on Plant Survival: A Micro-Econometric Analysis, International Journal of Industrial Organization (2006), doi:10.1016/j.ijindorg.2006.08.001.
Girma, S., Gong, y., Gorg, H., and Yu, Z., 2006. Can Production Subsidies Foster Export Activity? Evidence from Chinese Firm Level Data, the University of Nottingham, Research Paper 2006/43.
Gual, J. and Jodar, S. (2006). Vertical Industrial Policy in the EU: An Empirical Analysis of the Effectiveness of State Aid, EIB Papers 11 2 81-105.
Jorgenson, D., 1995. Productivity, volume 2. MIT Press.
Kesner-akreb, M., Pleoe I. and Mikic, M., 2003. State Aid to Enterprises in Croatia in 2001, Institute of Public Finance 2003 Occasional Paper No.18, October 2003.
Kornai, J.., Maskin E. and Roland G. (2003), Understanding the Soft Budget Constraint, mimeo, Harvard University.
Konings, J. (2001). The Effect Of Direct Foreign Investment on Domestic Firms, Economics of Transition, 9(3), 619–633.
Lavadas, K.A. and M. M. Mendrinou, 1999. Politics, Subsidies and Competition, The New Politics of State Intervention in the European Union, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
London Economics. Ex-post Evaluation of the Impact of Rescue and Restructuring Aid on the International Competitiveness of the Sector(s) Affected by Such Aid. Final Report to the European Commission - Enterprise Directorate-General. Report, June 2004.
Mariniello, M., 2006. State Aid to Attract FDI and the European Competition Policy: Should Variable Cost Aid Be Banned? EUI Working Paper ECO No.2006/41.
Olley, S and Pakes, A., 1996. The Dynamics of Productivity in the Telecommunications Equipment Industry. Econometrica, 64(6):1263–1297.
Roodman, D. 2007. “A Note on the Theme of Too Many Instruments ,” Working Paper No. 125, Center for Global Development.
Roodman, D. 2006. “How to Do xtabond2: An Introduction to “Difference” and “System” GMM in Stata,” Working Paper No. 103, Center for Global Development.
Schweiger, H., 2006. The Impact of State Aid for Restructuring on the Allocation of Resources, University of Maryland, Mimeo.
Solow, R., 1957. Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function. Review of Economics and Statistics, 39:312–320, August 1957.
Van Biesebroeck, J., 2004. Robustness of Productivity Estimates. Working Paper 10303, NBER.
Stock J. and Watson, M. 2007, Introduction to Econometrics. 2nd Edition, Addison-Wesley Longman, Amsterdam.
Wooldridge, J., 2005. On Estimating Firm-Level Production Functions Using Proxy Variables to Control for Unobservables. Mimeo.
Yudaeva, K. and Tytell, I. (2005). The Role of FDI in Eastern Europe and New Independent States: New Channels for the Spillover Effect. Mimeo.
Zhu , P., Xu, W., Lundin, N., 2005. The Impact of Government’s Fundings and Tax Incentives on Industrial R&D Investments—Empirical Evidences from Industrial Sectors in Shanghai. China Economic Review 17 (2006) 51–69.
Domenico J. Marchetti and Francesco Nucci. Labor Effort Over the Business Cycle. Research Paper 424, Banca d’Italia, 2001.