Open innovation and the management of intra-firm conflict

Pitelis, Christos and Panagopoulos, Andreas (2009): Open innovation and the management of intra-firm conflict.

Abstract

We analyse the hitherto unexplored relationship between intra-firm conflict between the research and development (R&D) department and central management, conflict alleviation and the choice of ‘open’ versus ‘closed’ innovation, in the context of a simple formal model. We find that in the presence of (intentional or unintentional) divergence of preferred (R&D) output between the R&D department and central management, the decision by central management to adopt an ‘open’ (versus ‘closed’) innovation approach, may help serve the twin purpose of shifting constraints to growth and increasing firm profitability, by alleviating intra-firm conflict.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: intra-firm conflict, management, open innovation, firm growth
• Subjects: M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M0 - General > M00 - General; D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D74 - Conflict ; Conflict Resolution ; Alliances ; Revolutions

References

Alchian, A.A. and Demsetz, H. (1972) ‘Production, information costs, and economic organization’, The American Economic Review, Vol. 62, No. 5, pp. 777-795.

Arora, A., Fosfuri, A. and Gambardella, A. (2001) Markets for technology: The economics of innovation and corporate strategy, MIT Press, Cambridge and London.

Barney, J.B. (1991) ‘Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 99-120.

Becker, E.B. and Huselid, M.A. (2006) ‘Strategic human resources management: Where do we go from here?’, Journal of Management, Vol. 32, No. 6, pp. 898-925.

Bessen, J. and Meurer, M. (2005) ‘The patent litigation explosion’, Working paper No. 05–18. Boston University, School of Law.

Buchanan, D.A. (2008) ‘You stab my back, I’ll stab yours: Management experience and perceptions of organization political behaviour’, British Journal of Management, Vol. 19, pp. 49-64.

Chandler, A.D. (1962) Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the industrial enterprise, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

Chesbrough, H. (2006) New puzzles and new findings open innovation: Researching a new paradigm, Oxford University Press.

Chesbrough, H. (2007) ‘Why companies should have open business models’, MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 22–28.

Coad, A. (2007) ‘Firm growth: A survey’, Papers on Economics and Evolution, Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena.

Cyert, R.M. and March, J.G. (1963/1992) A behavioral theory of the firm, 2nd ed., Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Eaton, B. and Schmitt, N. (1994) ‘Flexible manufacturing and market structure’, American Economic Review, Vol. 84, No. 4, pp. 875–888.

Gans, J.S. and Stern, S. (2003) ’The product market and the market for “ideas”: Commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs’, Research Policy, Vol. 23, pp. 333-350.

Greve, H.R. (2008) ‘A behavioral theory of firm growth: Sequential attention to size and performance goals’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 51, No. 3, pp 476-494.

Hall, B. and Ziedonis, R. (2001) ‘The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the US semiconductor industry, 1979–1995’, The RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 101–128.

Helfat, C.E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W. and Peteraf, M. A. (2007) Dynamic capabilities: understanding strategic change in organizations, Blackwell Publishing.

Jensen, M.C. and Meckling, W.H. (1976) ‘Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure’, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp.305–360.

Katkalo, V.S., Pitelis, C.N. and Teece, D.J. (2010) ‘On the Nature and Scope of Dynamic Capabilities’, Industrial and Corporate Change, forthcoming.

Mahoney, J.T. (2005) Economic foundations of strategy, Sage Publications, London and New York.

March, J.G. (1991) ‘Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning’, Organization Science, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 71–87.

March, J.G. (2008) Explorations in organizations, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.

Marris, R. (1996) ‘Managerial theories of the firm’, in M. Warner et al. (Eds.): International Encyclopaedia of Business and Management, pp. 317–25, Routledge, London.

Organization Science (2007) ‘Special Issue on Cyert and March’, Vol. 18, No. 3.

Parker, G. and Van Alstyne, M. (2007) ‘Innovation, openness, and platform control”, available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1079712.

Penrose, E.T. (1959/1995) The theory of the growth of the firm, 3rd ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Penrose, E.T. (1960) ‘The growth of the firm. A case study: a Hercules Powder company’, The Business History Review, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 1–23.

Penrose, P. and Pitelis, C.N. (1999) ‘Edith Elura Tilton Penrose: Life, Contribution and Influence’, Contributions to Political Economy, Vol. 18, pp. 3-22.

Peteraf, M. (1993) ‘The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 179–191.

Peteraf, M. and Barney, J. B. (2003) ‘Unravelling the resource-based tangle’, Managerial and Decision Economics, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 309–323.

Pitelis, C.N. (2007) ‘A behavioral resource-based view of the firm: The synergy of Cyert and March (1963) and Penrose (1959)’, Organization Science, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 478–490.

Pitelis, C.N. and Teece, D.J. (2009) ‘The (New) Nature and Essence of the Firm’, European Management Review, Vol. 6, pp. 5-15.

Pitelis, C.N. and Teece, D.J. (2010) ‘Cross-border Market Co-creation, Dynamic Capabilities and the Entrepreneurial Theory of the Multinational Enterprise’, Industrial and Corporate Change, forthcoming.

Porter, M. (1980) Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors, The Free Press, New York.

Research Policy (2006) ‘Special issue commemorating the 20th Anniversary of David Teece's article “Profiting from innovation”’, Vol. 35, No. 8.

Simon, H.A. (1995) ‘Organisations and markets’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory (Transaction), Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 273-295.

Teece, D.J. (1986) ‘Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy’, Research Policy, Vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 285–305.

Teece, D.J. (2006) ‘Reflections on “profiting from innovation”’, Research Policy, Vol. 35, No. 8, pp.1131-1146.

Teece, D.J. (2007) ‘Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 28, No. 13, pp. 1319–1350.

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997) ‘Dynamic capabilities and strategic management’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, No. 7, pp. 537-553.

The Academy of Management Review (2007) ‘Special topic forum on value creation’, Vol. 32, No. 1, January.

The Academy of Management Review (2009) ‘Special topic forum on formal approaches to management theory’, Vol. 34, No. 2, April.

von Hippel, E. (2005) Democratizing innovation, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Wernerfelt, B. (1984) ‘The resource-based view of the firm’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp.171-180.

West, J. and Gallagher, S. (2006a) ‘Challenges of open innovation: The paradox of firm investment in open source software’, R&D Management, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 319-331.

West, J. and Gallagher, S. (2006b) ‘Patterns of open innovation in open source software’, in H.W. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, J. West (Eds.): Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm, pp. 82-106, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Williamson, O.E. (1991) ‘Comparative economic organization: the analysis of discrete structural alternatives’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 36, No. 2, 269–296.

Wolter, C. and Veloso, F.M. (2008) ‘The effects of innovation on vertical structure: perspectives on transaction costs and competences’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 586-605.