Information-Sharing in Academia and the Industry: A Comparative Study

Haeussler, Carolin (2010): Information-Sharing in Academia and the Industry: A Comparative Study. Forthcoming in: Research Policy

Abstract

This paper investigates how scientists decide whether to share information with their colleagues or not. Detailed data on the decisions of 1,694 bio-scientists allow to detect similarities and differences between academia-based and industry-based scientists. Arguments from social capital theory are applied to explain why individuals share information even at (temporary) personal cost. In both realms, the results suggest that the likelihood of sharing decreases with the competitive value of the requested information. Factors related to social capital, i.e., expected reciprocity and the extent to which a scientist’s community conforms to the norm of open science, either directly affect information-sharing or moderate competitive interest considerations on information-sharing. The effect depends on the system to which a scientist belongs.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: information-sharing; social capital; reciprocity; open science; bio-sciences; IP protection mechanisms
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D21 - Firm Behavior: Theory; D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D03 - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles; L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior; D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D02 - Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty; Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z13 - Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology ; Social and Economic Stratification

References

Adler, P.S., Kwon, S., 2002. Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review 27(1), 17-40.

Aldrich, H.E., Cliff, J.E., 2003. The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing 19, 573-596.

Armstrong, J.B., Overton, T.S., 1977. Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research 14, 396-402.

Astebro, T., Thompson, P., 2007. Entrepreneurs: Jacks of all Trades or Hobos? Working Paper 0705, Florida International University, Department of Economics.

Azar, O.H., 2004. What sustains social norms and how they evolve? The case of tipping. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 54, 49-64.

Azoulay, P., Ding, W., Stuart, T. 2006. The impact of academic patenting on the rate, quality and impact of (public) research output. NBER Working Paper No. 11917.

Becker, G.S.; Murphy, K.M. 2000. Social economics – Market behavior in a social environment. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.

Bendor, J., Swistak, P., 2001. The evolution of norms. American Journal of Sociology 106(6), 1493-1545.

Bourdieu, P., 1986. The forms of capital. In: Richardson, J.G. (ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. New York: Greenwood, 241-258.

Bouty, I., 2000. Interpersonal and interaction influences on informal resource exchanges between R&D researchers across organizational boundaries. Academy of Management Journal 43(1), 50-65.

Boyd, R., Richerson, P.J., 2002. Group beneficial norms can spread rapidly in a structured population. Journal of Theoretical Biology 215, 287-296.

Burt, R.S. 1992. Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, 1992.

Campbell, E., Weissman, J.S., Causino, N., Blumenthal, D., 2000. Data-withholding in academic medicine: Characteristics of faculty denied access to research results and biomaterials. Research Policy 29, 303-312.

Child, J., Rodrigues, S., 1996. The role of social identity in the international transfer of knowledge through joint ventures. In: Clegg, S.R., Palmer, G., (Eds.). The politics of management knowledge. London: Sage: 46-68.

Cohen, J., Cohen, P., 1983. Applied multiple regression/ correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

Cohen, P., Cohen, J., Teresi, J., Marchi, M., Velez, C.N., 1990. Problems in the measurement of latent variables in structural equations causal models. Applied Psychological Measurement 14, 183-196.

Cohen, W.M., Nelson, R.R., Walsh, J.P., 2002. Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science 48(1), 1-23.

Cohen, W.M., Nelson, R.R., Walsh, J.P., 2000. Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). NBER Working Paper 7552.

Coleman, J.S. 1990. Foundations of social theory. Belknap Press: Cambridge, MA.

Collins, H.M., 1982. The sociology of scientific knowledge: A sourcebook, Bath: Bath University Press.

Coltman, T., Devinney, T.M., Midgley, D.F., Venaik, S., 2008. Formative versus reflective measurement models: Two applications of formative measurement. Journal of Business Research 61, 1250-1262.

Colyvas, J. 2007. From divergent meanings to common practices: the early institutionalization of technology transfer in the life sciences at Stanford University. Research Policy 36 (4), 456-476.

Constant, D., Sproull, L., Kiesler, S., 1996. The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organization Science 7(2), 119-135.

Dasgupta, P., David, P.A., 1994. Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy 23, 487-521.

David, P.A., 2004. Understanding the emergence of 'open science' institutions: Functionalist economics in historical context. Industrial and Corporate Change 13(4), 571-589.

Ding, W., Murray, F., Stuart, T, 2006. Gender differences in patenting in the academic life sciences. Science 313, No. 5787, 665 - 667.

Eamon, W., 1985. From the Secrets of Nature to Public Knowledge: The Origins of the Concept of Openness in Science. Minerva 23(3), 321-347.

Elster, J., 1989. Social norms and economic theory. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 3(4), 99-117.

Encinosa, W.E., Gaynor, M., Rebitzer, J.B., 2007. The sociology of groups and the economics of incentives: Theory and evidence on compensation systems. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 62, 187-214.

Fauchart, E., von Hippel, E., 2008. Norms-based intellectual property systems: The case of French chefs. Organization Science 19(2), 187-201.

Fehr, E., Fischbacher, U., Gaechter, S., 2002. Strong reciprocity, human cooperation and the enforcement of social norms. Human Nature 13, 1-25.

Fehr, E., Schmidt, K.M., 2000. Fairness, incentives, and contractual choices. European Economic Review 44(2), 393-421.

Feldman, D.C., 1984. The development and enforcement of group norms. The Academy of Management Review 9(1), 47-53.

Fukuyama, F. 1995. Trust: Social virtues and the creation of prosperity. London: Hamish Hamilton.

Furman, J., Stern, S., 2008. Climbing atop the shoulders of giants: The impact of institutions on cumulative research. Paper presented at the CAMS Seminar April 2008.

Gabbay, S.M, Zuckerman, E.W.,1998. Social capital and opportunity in corporate R&D: The contingent effect of contact density on mobility expectations. Social Science Research 27, 189-217.

Gill, D., 2008. Strategic disclosure of intermediate research results. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 17(3), 733-758.

Gintis, H., 2003. The hitchhiker’s guide to altruism: Gene-culture co-evolution and the internalization of norms. Journal of Theoretical Biology 220, 407–418.

Glaeser, E.L., 2006. Researcher Incentives and Empirical Methods. Harvard Institute of Economic Research Discussion Paper 2122.

Granovetter, M.S., 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91, 481-510.

Haeussler, C., 2011. The determinants of commercialization strategy: Idiosyncrasies in British and German biotechnology. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 35(3) (forthcoming).

Haeussler, C., Jiang, L., Thursby, J., Thursby, M. 2009. Specific and general information sharing. NBER Working Paper 15315.

Haeussler, C., Colyvas, J.A. in press. Breaking the ivory tower. Forms and antecedents of academic entrepreneurship in the life sciences in UK and Germany. Research Policy (in press).

Hagström, W.O, 1965. The scientific community. New York: Basic Books.

Henkel, J., 2008. Champions of revealing - The role of open source developers in commercial firms. SSRN Working Paper.

Henrich, J., Boyd, R., 2001. Why people punish defectors: conformist transmission stabilizes costly enforcement of norms in cooperative dilemmas. Journal of Theoretical Biology 208, 79-89.

Hicks, D., 1995. Published papers, tacit competencies and corporate management of the public/private character of knowledge. Industrial and Corporate Change 4(2), 401-424.

Hilgartner, S. 2000. Access to data and intellectual property: Scientific exchange in genome research. In: Intellectual property and research tools in molecular biology: Report of a workshop. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.

Hilgartner, S., Brandt-Rauf, S.I., 1994. Data access, ownership, and control: Toward empirical studies of access practices. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 15(4), 355-273.

Jain, S, George, G, Maltarich, M, 2009. Academics or entrepreneurs? Investigating role identity modification of university scientists involved in commercialization activity, Research Policy 38, 922 – 935.

Kenney, M., 1986. Biotechnology: The university-industrial complex. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Kenney, M., Goe, W.R., 2004. The role of social embeddedness in professorial entrepreneurship: A comparison of electrical engineering and computer science at UC Berkeley and Stanford. Research Policy 33(5), 691-707.

Kim, C.W., Mauborgne, R., 1998. Procedural justice, strategic decision making, and the knowledge economy. Strategic Management Journal 19, 323-338.

Kleinman, D., 2003. Impure cultures: University biology and the world of commerce. University of Wisconsin Press: Madison, WI.

Knorr Cetina, K., Bruegger, U., 2002. Global microstructure: The virtual societies of financial markets. American Journal of Sociology 107, 905-950.

Knorr Cetina, K., 1999. Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.

Lakhani K.R., Jeppesen, L., Lohse, P., Panetta, J., 2007. The value of openness in scientific problem solving. Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 07-050.

Lambert Review of Business-University Collaborations, 2003. URL: http://www.eua.be/eua/jsp/en/upload/lambert_review_final_450.1151581102387.pdf [accessed Nov 30, 2009].

Latour, B., Woolgar, S. 1979. Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts. Princeton N.J.: Princeton University Press.

Leana, C.R., van Buren, H.J., 1999. Organizational social capital and employment practices 24(3), 538-555.

Liebeskind, J. P, Oliver, A.L., Zucker, L., Brewer, M., 1996. Social networks, learning,and flexibility: Sourcing scientific knowledge in new biotechnology firms. Organization Science 7, 428-443.

Lockett, A., Wright, M. 2005. Resources, Capabilities, Risk Capital and the Creation of University Spin-Out Companies. Research Policy, 34(7), 1043-1057.

Lord Sainsbury of Turville, 2007. The race to the top - A review of government’s science and innovation policies. URL: http://www.rsc.org/ScienceAndTechnology/Parliament/sainsburyreview.asp [accessed: Nov. 30, 2009]

Mauss, M., 1950. Essai sur le don [Essay on the gift]. P.U.F., Paris.

McCain, K., 1991. Communication, competition, and secrecy: The production and dissemination of research-related information in genetics. Science, Technology & Human Values 16, 491-516.

McKelvey, M.D., 2000. Evolutionary innovations: The business of biotechnology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Merton, R.K., 1957. Social theory and social structure. Free Press of Glencoe, New York.

Merton, R.K., 1973. The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Murray, F., forthcoming. The oncomouse that roared.: Hybrid exchange strategies as a source of productive tension at the boundary of overlapping institutions. American Journal of Sociology.

Murray, F., Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: Exploring tissue engineering. Research Policy 31, 1389-1403.

Nahapiet, J., Ghoshal. S. 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review 23(2), 242-266.

Oliar, D., Sprigman, C., 2008. The emergence of intellectual property norms in stand-up comedy. American Law & Economic Association Annual Meetings Paper 41.

O'Mahony, S., 2003. Guarding the commons: how community managed software projects protect their work. Research Policy 32, 1179-1198.

Ostrom, E., 1999. Coping with tragedies of the commons. American Review of Political Science 2, 493-535.

PatVal-EU, 2005. The value of the European patents: Evidence from a survey of European inventors. Final report of the PatVal-EU Project, DG Science & Technology, European Commission. Contract N. HPV2-CT-2001-00013, Brussels.

Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.-Y., Podsakoff, N.P., 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88, 879-904.

Powell, W.W., 1990. Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in organizational behavior, 12, 295-336.

Powell, W.W., Koput, K.W., Smith-Doerr, L., Owen-Smith, J. 1999. Network position and firm performance: Organizational returns to collaboration in the biotechnology industry. Andrews, S.B., Knoke, D. (Eds.). Research in the sociology of organizations 16, 129-159.

Powell, W.W., Owen-Smith, J. 1998. Universities and the market for intellectual property in the life sciences. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 17 (2), 253-277.

Powell, W.W., White, D.R., Koput, K.W., Owen-Smith, J., 2005. Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. American Journal of Sociology 110, 1132-1205.

Rai, A.K., 1999. Regulating scientific research: IPR and the norms of science. Northwestern University School of Law Review 94, 77-152.

Rhoten, D., Powell, W.W., 2007. The frontiers of intellectual property: Expanded protection vs. new models of open science. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 3, 345-373.

Rimal, R., Real, K., 2003. Understanding the influence of perceived norms on behaviors. Communication Theory 13, 148-203.

Rosenberg, N., 1990. Why do companies do basic research (with their own money)? Research Policy 19(2), 165-174. Rumelt, R., Schendel, D., Teece, D., 1991. Strategic management and economics. Strategic Management Journal 12, 5-29.

Schrader, S., 1991. Informal technology transfer between firms: Cooperation through information trading. Research Policy 20, 153-170.

Schumpeter, J. A. 1934. The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest and the business cycle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Scotchmer, S., 1991. Standing on the shoulders of giants: Cumulative research and the patent law. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 5(1), 29-41.

Sethi, R., Somanathan, E., 2003. Understanding reciprocity. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 50, 1-27.

Shapin, S. 2008. The scientific life: a moral history of a late modern vocation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Sorenson, O., Fleming, L., 2004. Science and the diffusion of knowledge. Research Policy 33, 1615-1634.

Stephan, P.E., 1996. The economics of science. Journal of Economic Literature 34, 1199-1235.

Stokes, D., 1997. Pasteur’s Quadrant: basic science and technological innovation. The Brookings Institute: Washington, DC.

Takahashi, N., 2000. The emergence of generalized exchange. American Journal of Sociology 105, 1105-1134.

Thibaut, J.W., Kelley, H.H. 1959. The social psychology of groups. John Wiley, New York.

Thorn. B.K., Connolly, T. 1987. Discretionary data bases. A theory and some experimental findings. Communication Research 14 (5), 512-528.

Thursby, J., Thursby, M., 2003. University Licensing Under Bayh-Dole: What are the Issues and Evidence? Working Paper.

Thursby, M., Thursby, J., Haeussler, C., Jiang., L. 2009. Do academic scientists freely share information? Not necessarily. Vox News Nov 29, 2009 [accessed Nov 30, 2009: http://www.voxeu.org/index.php?q=node/4264]

Tsai, W., Ghoshal, S. 1998. Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal 41, 464-478.

Vallas, S.P., Kleinman, D.L. 2008. Contradiction, convergence and the knowledge economy: The confluence of academic and industrial biotechnology. Socio-Economic Review 6 (2), 283-311, 2008.

von Hippel, E., 1987. Cooperation between rivals: Informal know-how trading. Research Policy 16, 291-302.

von Hippel, E., 2005. Democratizing Innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Walsh, J.P., Cohen, W.M., Cho, C., 2007. Where excludability matters: Material versus intellectual property in academic biomedical research. Research Policy 36(8), 1184-1203.

Wasko McLure, M.; Faraj, S. 2005. Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly 29(1), 35-57.

Westphal, J.D., Gulati, R., Shortell, S.M., 1997. Customization or conformity? An institutional and network perspective on the content and consequences of TQM adoption. Administrative Science Quarterly 42(2), 366-394.

Wooldridge, J.M., 2002. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA, London, UK: MIT Press.

Zucker, L.G., Darby, M.R., Brewer, M.B., 1998. Intellectual human capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises. American Economic Review 88(1), 290-306.