Ahlfeldt, Gabriel M. and Georgios, Kavetsos (2010): Form or Function? The Impact of New Football Stadia on Property Prices in London.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_25003.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper focuses on the channels through which stadium externalities capitalize into property prices. We investigate two of the largest stadium investment projects of the recent decade – the This paper focuses on the channels through which stadium externalities capitalize into property prices. We investigate two of the largest stadium investment projects of the recent decade – the New Wembley and the Emirates stadium in London, UK. Evidence suggests positive stadium externalities, which are large compared to construction costs. Notable anticipation effects are found immediately following the announcement of the final stadium plans. Our results emphasize the role stadium architecture plays in promoting positive spillovers to the neighbourhood. We therefore recommend public funding of large-scale sports facilities to be made conditional on a comprehensive urban design strategy that maximizes the external benefits.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Form or Function? The Impact of New Football Stadia on Property Prices in London |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Property prices Stadium impact |
Subjects: | R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R5 - Regional Government Analysis > R53 - Public Facility Location Analysis ; Public Investment and Capital Stock R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R5 - Regional Government Analysis > R58 - Regional Development Planning and Policy |
Item ID: | 25003 |
Depositing User: | Gabriel M. Ahlfeldt |
Date Deposited: | 15 Sep 2010 09:01 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 15:23 |
References: | Ahlfeldt, G. M. (in press). The Train has Left the Station: Do Markets Value Inter-City Access to Intra-City Rail Lines? German Economic Review, forthcoming. Ahlfeldt, G. M., Maennig, W., and Scholz, H. (2010) Expected external effects and Voting: The Case of the Munich Allianz-Arena. Journal of Economics and Statistics, 230(1), 2-26. Ahlfeldt, G.M. and Maennig, W. (2009) Arenas, arena architecture and the impact of location desirability: The case of ‘Olympic arenas’ in Prenzlauer Berg, Berlin. Urban Studies, 46(7), 1343-1362. Ahlfeldt, G.M. and Maennig, W. (2010) Impact of sports arenas on land values: Evidence from Berlin. The Annals of Regional Science, 44(2), 205-227. Ahlfeldt, G.M. and Maennig, W. (2010) Stadium architecture and urban development from the perspective of urban economics. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(3), 629-646. Black, S. (1999) Do better schools matter? Parental valuation of elementary education. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(2), 577-599. Carlino, G. and Coulson, N. (2004) Compensation differentials and the social benefits of the NFL. Journal of Urban Economics, 56(1), 25-50. Carlino, G. and Coulson, N. (2006) Compensation differentials and the social benefits of the NFL: Reply. Journal of Urban Economics, 60(1), 132-138. Coates, D. and Humphreys, B. (2006) Proximity benefits and voting on stadium and arena subsidies. Journal of Urban Economics, 59(2), 285-299. Coates, D., Humphreys, B. and Zimbalist, A. (2006) Compensating differentials and the social benefits of the NFL: A comment. Journal of Urban Economics, 60(1), 124-131. Crompton, J. (2000) designing golf courses to optimize proximate property values. Managing Leisure, 5(4), 192-199. Dehring, C., Depken, C. and Ward, M. (2007) The impact of stadium announcements on residential property values: Evidence from a natural experiment in Dallas-Fort Worth. Contemporary Economic Policy, 25(4), 627-638. Feng, X. and Humphreys, B. (2008) Assessing the economic impact of sports facilities on residential property values: A spatial hedonic approach. International Association of Sports Economists, Working Paper 0812. http://ideas.repec.org/p/spe/wpaper/0812.html. Gibbons, S. (2004) The costs of urban property crime. Economic Journal, 114, F441-F463. Gibbons, S. and Machin, S. (2003) Valuing English primary schools. Journal of Urban Economics, 53(2), 197–219. Gibbons, S. and Machin, S. (2005) Valuing rail access using transport innovations. Journal of Urban Economics, 57(1), 148-169. Gibbons, S. and Machin, S. (2006) Paying for primary schools: Admission constraints, school popularity or congestion? Economic Journal, 116, C77-C92. Gibbons, S. and Machin, S. (2008) Valuing school quality, better transport, and lower crime: evidence from house prices. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 24(1), 99-119. Halvorsen, R. and Palmquist, R. (1980) The interpretation of dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations. American Economic Review, 70(3), 474-475. Hess, D. and Almeida, T. (2007) Impact of proximity to light rail rapid transit on station-area property values in Buffalo, New York. Urban Studies, 44(5-6), 1041-1068. Kasimati, E. (2003) Economic aspects and the Summer Olympics: A review of related research. International Journal of Tourism Research, 5(6), 433-444. Kavetsos, G. (2009) The impact of the London Olympics announcement on property prices, SSRN working paper 1552322. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1552322. Kiel, K.A., Matheson, V.A. and Sullivan, C. (2010) The effect of sports franchises on property values: The role of owners versus renters. College of the Holy Cross, Department of Economics Faculty Research Series, No. 10-01. http://college.holycross.edu/RePEc/hcx/Kiel-Matheson_NFLStadiums.pdf. McMillen, D. P., & McDonald, J. F. (2004). Reaction of House Prices to a New Rapid Transit Line: Chicago's Midway Line, 1983-1999. Real Estate Economics, 32(3), 463-486. Siegfried, J. and Zimbalist, A. (2000) The economics of sports facilities and their communities. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 95-114. Tomkins, J., Topham, N. and Ward, R. (1998) Noise versus access: The impact of an airport in an urban property market. Urban Studies, 35(2), 243-258. Tu, C. (2005) How does a new sports stadium affect housing values? The case of FedEx Field. Land Economics, 81(3), 379-395. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/25003 |