Kotera, Go and Okada, Keisuke and Samreth, Sovannroeun (2010): A study on the relationship between corruption and government size: the role of democracy.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_25015.pdf Download (101kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Previous studies on the effect of government size on corruption have produced mixed results. For the purpose of explaining these ambiguous results, our study investigates the effect of government size on corruption by taking into account the role of democracy level in each country. Using annual data from 82 countries from 1995 to 2008, the estimation results indicate that an increase in government size can lead to a decrease in corruption if democracy level is sufficiently high and, in contrast, can lead to an increase in corruption if it is too low. As a robustness check, estimations using a different index of corruption and a different proxy for government size are also conducted. The results show that our main results are robust. Furthermore, to deal with endogeneity problems, we conduct an instrumental variable estimation, the results of which support our main results. These findings provide some important implications for policymakers seeking to conduct government intervention without aggravating corruption.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | A study on the relationship between corruption and government size: the role of democracy |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Corruption; Government Size; Democracy; Instrumental Variable Estimation |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D73 - Bureaucracy ; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations ; Corruption H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H50 - General H - Public Economics > H1 - Structure and Scope of Government > H11 - Structure, Scope, and Performance of Government |
Item ID: | 25015 |
Depositing User: | Sovannroeun Samreth |
Date Deposited: | 15 Sep 2010 08:24 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 16:35 |
References: | Acemoglu, D., & Verdier, T. (2000). The choice between market failures and corruption. American Economic Review, 90, 194-211. Adserà, A., Boix, C., & Payne, M. (2003). Are you being served? political accountability and quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 19, 445-490. Alesina, A., & Angeletos, G.-M. (2005). Corruption, inequality, and fairness. Journal of Monetary Economics, 52, 1227-1244. Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: an economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76, 169-217. Billger, S. M., & Goel, R. K. (2009). Do existing corruption levels matter in controlling corruption? cross-country quantile regression estimates. Journal of Development Economics, 90, 299-305. Del Monte, A., & Papagni, E. (2007). The determinants of corruption in Italy: regional panel data analysis. European Journal of Political Economy, 23, 379-396. Glaeser, E. L., & Saks, R. E. (2006). Corruption in America. Journal of Public Economics, 90, 1053-1072. Goel, R. K., & Nelson, M. A. (1998). Corruption and government size: a disaggregated analysis. Public Choice, 97, 107-120. Lal, D. (1985). The poverty of `development economics’. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1999). The quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 15, 222-279. Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 681-712. Mauro, P. (1998). Corruption and the composition of government expenditure. Journal of Public Economics, 69, 263-279. Méndez, F., & Sepúlveda, F. (2006). Corruption, growth and political regimes: cross country evidence. European Journal of Political Economy, 22, 82-98. Mills, E. S. (1986). The burden of government. Stanford: Hoover Institution Press. Niskanen, W. A. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago: Aldine/Atherton. Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (1999). The size and scope of government: comparative politics with rational politicians. European Economic Review, 43, 699-735. Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (2003). The economic effects of constitutions. Cambridge: MIT Press. Rajkumar, A. S., & Swaroop, V. (2008). Public spending and outcomes: does governance matter? Journal of Development Economics, 86, 96-111. Rose-Ackerman, S. (1978). Corruption: a study in political economy. New York: Academic Press. Rose-Ackerman, S. (1999). Corruption and government: causes, consequences, and reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Saha, S., Gounder, R., & Su, J.-J. (2009). The interaction effect of economic freedom and democracy on corruption: a panel cross-country analysis. Economics Letters, 105, 173-176. Serra, D. (2006). Empirical determinants of corruption: a sensitivity analysis. Public Choice, 126, 225-256. Shelton, C. A. (2007). The size and composition of government expenditure. Journal of Public Economics, 91, 2230-2260. Staiger, D., & Stock, J. H. (1997). Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments. Econometrica, 65, 557-586. Stock, J. H., & Yogo, M. (2005). Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. In D. W. K. Andrews, & J. H. Stock (Eds.), Identification and inference for econometric models: essays in honor of Thomas Rothenberg (pp. 80-108). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Treisman, D. (2000). The causes of corruption: a cross-national study. Journal of Public Economics, 76, 399-457. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/25015 |