Kontek, Krzysztof (2010): Two Kinds of Adaptation, Two Kinds of Relativity.
Download (327kB) | Preview
This paper presents a review of adaptation concepts at the evolutionary, environmental, neural, sensory, mental and mathematical levels, including Helson’s and Parducci’s theories of perception and category judgments. Two kinds of adaptation can be clearly distinguished. The first, known as level adaptation, refers to the shift of the neutral perception level to the average stimulus value. It results in a single reference point and stimuli changes represented in absolute terms. This concept is employed by Prospect Theory, which assumes that gains and losses are perceived as monetary amounts. The second kind of adaptation refers to the adjustment of perception sensitivity to stimuli range. It results in two reference points (minimum and maximum stimulus) and stimuli changes perceived in relative terms. Both range adaptation and range relativity are well documented phenomena and have even been confirmed by the creators of Prospect Theory. This makes room for another decision making theory based on the range relativity approach. As shown by Kontek (2009), such a theory would not require the concept of probability weighting to describe lottery experiments or behavioral paradoxes.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Two Kinds of Adaptation, Two Kinds of Relativity|
|Keywords:||Adaptation-Level Theory, Range-Frequency Theory, Prospect Theory|
|Subjects:||D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D03 - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles
D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D81 - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior
D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D87 - Neuroeconomics
|Depositing User:||Krzysztof Kontek|
|Date Deposited:||20. Sep 2010 02:32|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 03:51|
Anderson, N. H., (1992). Integration Psychophysics and Cognition. In Psychophysical Approaches to Cognition, Algom D. (Editor), Advances in Psychology, Elsevier Science Publishers, 92.
Baltussen, G., Post, T., Van den Assem, M. J., (2008) Risky Choice and the Relative Size of Stakes. SSRN Working Paper http://ssrn.com/abstract=989242 .
Birnbaum, M. (1974). Using contextual effects to derive psychophysical scales. Perception & Psycho-physics, 15, pp. 89-96.
Birnbaum, M. (1992). Violations of monotonicity and contextual effects in choice-based certainty equivalents. Psychological Science, 3 (5), pp. 310-314.
Brickman, P., Campell, D. (1971). Hedonic relativism and planning the good society. In M. H. Appley (Editor.), Adaptation-level theory: A symposium (pp. 287-302). New York Academic Press.
Darwin, C. (1859). “Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection: Or, the Preservation of the Fa-voured Races in the Struggle for Life”.
Eiser, J. R., (1986). Social Psychology. Cambridge University Press.
Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G. (1999). Hedonic Adaptation. In Kahneman, D., Diener, E. Schwarz, N. (Editors) Well-Being. The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. Russell Sage Foundation. pp. 302-329.
Giraldi, T., De Vanna, M., Malagoli, M., Tuveri, G., Sutto, K., Schilliani, G., Grassi, L., (2007). Mental adaptation to cancer: depression and blood platelet monoamine oxidase activity in breast cancer patients. Anticancer Res., 27(3B), pp. 1715-9.
Greenberg, N., Adaptation defined. https://notes.utk.edu/bio/greenberg.nsf .
Gregory, R. L., Colman, A. M. (1995). Sensation and Perception. Longman Group Limited.
Hildebrandt, K., J., (2010). Neural adaptation in the auditory pathway of crickets and grasshoppers. Dissertation, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlich Fakultaet, Humboldt-Universitaet, Berlin.
Jasinskaja-Lahti, I., (2008). Long-term immigrant adaptation: Eight-year follow-up study among immigrants from Russia and Estonia living in Finland. International Journal of Psychology, 43 (1), pp. 6-18.
Helson, H., (1964). Adaptation-level theory. Harper & Row, New York.
James, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology. An Internet resource developed by Green, C. D. http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/James/Principles/index.htm
Kahneman, D., (1999). Objective Happiness. In Kahneman, D., Diener, E., Schwartz, N. (Editors), Well-Being. The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. Russell Sage Foundation. pp. 3-25.
Kahneman, D., Tversky, A., (1979). Prospect Theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, pp. 263-91.
Kahneman, D., Tversky, A., (1984). Choices, Values, and Frames. American Psychologist, 39 (4), pp. 341-350.
Keegan, D. (2010). Psychology Site. http://www.gerardkeegan.co.uk/glossary/gloss_f.htm
Kontek, K., (2009). Absolute vs. Relative Notion of Wealth Changes. MPRA Paper http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/17336/, Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1474229 .
Laughlin, S. B., (1989). The role of sensory adaptation in the retina. Journal of Experimental Biology, 146, pp. 39-62.
Lawless, H. T., Heymann, H. (1998). Sensory evaluation of food. Chapman & Hall., New York.
Leakey, R. E. (1981). Making of Mankind. E P Dutton.
Leon, G., R., (2004). Overview of the psychosocial impact of disasters. Prehosp Disast Med, 19(1), pp. 4-9.
Mante, V., Frazor, R. A., Bonin, V., Geisler, W. S., Carandini, M. (2005). Independence of luminance and contrast in natural scenes and in the early visual system. Nature neuroscience, 8(12), pp. 1690- 1697.
Markowitz H., (1952). The Utility of Wealth. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 60, pp. 151-158.
Maniezzo, V., Roffilli, M. (2007). A Psychogenetic Algorithm for Behavioral Sequence Learning. International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools, 16, pp. 195-217.
Medawar, P. B., Medawar, J.S., (1983). Aristotle to Zoos. A Philosophical Dictionary of Biology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Mochon, D., Norton, M. I., Ariely, D., (2008). Getting off the hedonic treadmill, one step at a time: The impact of regular religious practice and exercise on well being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, pp. 632-642.
Nussbaum, J. I., (2004). Inclusion and Exclusion: Implications for Stereotypic Judgments of Groups and Individuals. Senior Thesis in Social Psychology, Haverford College.
Parducci, A. (1965). Category judgment: a range-frequency model. Psychol. Rev. 72(6), pp. 407-18.
Parducci, A. (1983). Category Ratings and the Relational Character of Judgment. In Geissler, H.-G., Buffart, H.F.J.M., Leeuwenberg, E.L.J., Sarris, V. (Editors). Modern Issues in Perception. Advances in Psychology, 11, pp. 262-282. Elsevier Science Publishers., Amsterdam.
Parducci, A., (1995). Happiness, Pleasure, and Judgment. The Contextual Theory and Its Applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Mahwah, New Jersey.
Rappaport, R.A. (1971). Ritual, sanctity, and cybernetics. American Anthropologist, 73(1), pp. 59-76.
Robbins, T. W. (2000). Arousal and Attention: Psychopharmacological and Neuropsychological Stud-ies in Experimental Animals. In Parasuraman, R. (Editor), The Attentive Brain. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Robson, A. J. (2001). The Biological Basis of Economic Behavior. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. XXXIX, pp. 11-33.
Robson, A. J. (2002). Evolution and Human Nature. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16 (2), pp. 89-106.
Roeckelein, J. E., (1998). Dictionary of theories, laws, and concepts in psychology. Greenwood Press.
Schwartz, A., Goldberg, J., Hazen, G. (2008). Prospect theory, reference points, and health decisions. Judgment and Decision Making, 3(2), pp. 174-180.
Sulavik, J., (1997). An elementary form of mental adaptation to death. Human Affairs, 2, December 1997.
Thaler, R. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1, pp. 39-60.
Thaler, R. (1999). Mental Accounting Matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, pp. 183-206.
Vlaev, I., Chater, N., (2007). Relativistic financial decisions: Context effects on retirement saving and investment risk preferences. Judgment and Decision Making, 2, pp. 292-311.
Wark, B., Lundstrom, B. N., Fairhall, A. (2007). Sensory adaptation. Current opinion in Neurobiol-ogy, 17, pp. 423-429.
Webster, M. A., Werner, J. S., Field, D. J. (2005). Adaptation and the Phenomenology of Perception. In Clifford, C., Rhodes, G. (Editors) Fitting the Mind to the World: Adaptation and Aftereffects in High Level Vision: Advances in Visual Cognition Series, Vol. 2, pp. 241-281. Oxford University Press.
Williams, G. C., (1966). Adaptation and natural selection; a critique of some current evolutionary thought. Princeton.