Aritenang, Adiwan F. (2008): A Study on Indonesia Regions Disparity: Post Decentralization.
Download (381kB) | Preview
Since its independence, Indonesia has developed fluctuated and uneven. The financial crisis and political changes has lead to decentralization in 1999, which has entitled local governments (province and regency/municipality) to develop its region autonomously. Surprisingly, it was concern that the decentralization will increase the disparities, rather than decrease it. This research uses Indonesia disparities in the province level. Using regression analysis we will overview Indonesian provinces disparities and poverty rate to overview the economic growth after decentralization. Overall, this research aims to shows the economic performance of Indonesia regions and highlight determinant factors that impacts poverty rate. This research lays in the Poverty reduction theory and ideology within a context of globalization sub-theme because it studies on the approach that Indonesia government took to solve disparities and encourages poor regions to advance its development.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||A Study on Indonesia Regions Disparity: Post Decentralization|
|English Title:||A Study on Indonesia Regions Disparity: Post Decentralization|
|Keywords:||decentralization; disparity; economic growth|
|Subjects:||H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H70 - General
O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O43 - Institutions and Growth
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C33 - Panel Data Models ; Spatio-temporal Models
R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R11 - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes
|Depositing User:||adiwan Aritenang|
|Date Deposited:||21. Sep 2010 20:26|
|Last Modified:||11. Mar 2015 15:24|
Azzoni, C.R., 2001, Economic Growth and Regional Income Inequality in Brazil, The Annals of Regional Science 35, pp. 135-152
Akira, T., and Alisjahbana, A.S., 2002, Regional Income Inequality in Indonesia and the Initial Impact of the Economic Crisis, Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 38 (2), pp. 201-222
Akita, T., and Lukman, R.A., 1995, Interregional Inequalities in Indonesia: A Sectoral Decomposition Analysis for 1975-92, Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 31 (2), pp. 61-81
Brodjonegoro, B., 2003, The Indonesian Decentralization after law revision: Toward a better future?, Department of Economics, University of Indonesia.
Brodjonegoro, B., and Martinez, J., 2002, An Analysis of Indonesia’s Transfer System : Recent Performance and Future Prospects, presented at The Andrew Young School of Policy Studies sponsored conference on “Can Decentralization Help Rebuild Indonesia ?”,Georgia State University, Atlanta.
Barro, R.J, 1991, Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries, Quarterly Journal of Economics, CVI (2), pp. 407-443.
Barro, R.J, 1997, Determinants of Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Empirical Study, MIT Press Barro, R.J., and Sala-i Martin, X., 2004, Economic Growth, MIT Press
Fan, C.C., and Scott, A.J, 2003, Industrial Agglomeration and Development: A Survey of Survey Economic Issues in East Asia and A Statistical Analysis of Chinese Regions, Economic Geography 79 (3), pp.295-319
Fan, C.C, and Sun, M., 2008, Regional Inequality in China 1978-2006, Eurasian Geography and Economics 49(1), pp. 1-20
Garcia, J., and Soelistianingsih, L., 1998, Why do Differences in Provincial Incomes Persist in Indonesia?,Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 34 (1), pp. 95-120
Harrisson, A., 2007, Globalization and Poverty, An Introduction, in Harrisson, A., Globalization and Poverty, The University of Chicago Press, Chiacago.
Indonesia Statistic Bureau, 2005, Statistical Year Book of Indonesia, Jakarta
Kuncoro, M., 2004, Otonomi and Pembangunan Daerah: Reformasi, Perencanaan, Strategi, dan Peluang, Penerbit, Airlangga. Jakarta.
Martin, R.,and Sunley, P., 1998, Slow Convergence? The New Endogenous Growth Theory and Regional Development, Economic Geography 74 (3), pp. 201-227.
Nissanke, M, 2007, Pro-Poor Globalization: An Elusive Concept of a Realistic Perspective?An Inaugural lecture, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.
Nurcholis, H., 2005, Teori dan Praktek Pemerintahan dan Otonomi Daerah, Jakarta: PT. Grasindo
Quah, D., 1993, Empirical cross-section dynamics in economic growth, European Economic Review 37 pp 426- 434
Quah, D., 1996, Empirics for economic growth and convergence, European Economic Review 40 pp 1353-1375
Petrakos, G., Pose, A.R., and Rovolis, A., 2005, Growth, Integration, and Regional Disparities in the European Union, Environment and Planning A 37 pp. 1837-1855
Pose, A.R., and Gill, N., 2004, Is There a Global Link between Regional Disparities and Devolution?, Environment and Planning A 36 pp. 2097-2117
Resosudarmo B.P., and Vidyattama, Y., 2006, Regional Income Disparity in Indonesia: A Panel Data Analysis, ASEAN Economic Bulletin 23 No 1, 31-44
Seymour, R., and Turner, S., 2002, Otonomi Daerah: Indonesia’s Decentralization Experiment, New Zealand Journal of Asian Studies 4 (2), pp. 33-51
Tambunan, T., 2006 Perekonomian Indonesia sejak Orde Lama hingga Pacsa Krisis, Jakarta: Pustaka Quantum