The dual role of external corporate venturing in technological exploration

Vanhaverbeke, Wim and Li, Ying and Van de Vrande, Vareska (2009): The dual role of external corporate venturing in technological exploration.

Abstract

Firms tend toward local search when they continue to build on own technological knowledge. Therefore, technological exploration has usually been associated with some form of boundary spanning activities. In line with previous research this study focuses on organizational or external boundary-spanning exploration, but in contrast to previous studies, it distinguishes between explorative learning from partners and from non-partners. Partners are considered as organizations with whom a focal firm has some kind of external venturing relations, i.e. technological alliances, corporate venturing capital, or M&As. Central in the study is the dual role of these external corporate venturing relations and their effect on the two types of exploration. In explorative learning from partners, the external venturing relationships function as pipes to exchange information between the partners. In explorative learning from non-partners, partners may play a role as prisms. That is, they inform the focal firm about technological opportunities beyond its current network. The results of the empirical analysis confirm the dual role of the partners in advancing the two types of explorative learning. The results furthermore indicate that intermediate levels of technological distance between a focal firm and its partners foster explorative learning from partners, while low levels of technological distance enhances explorative learning from non-partners.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: open innovation; cross-boundary exploration; corporate venturing; roles of technology partners
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D74 - Conflict ; Conflict Resolution ; Alliances ; Revolutions; L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L24 - Contracting Out ; Joint Ventures ; Technology Licensing; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives

References

Acs, Z.J., Audretsch, D.B., (1990). Innovation and Small Firms. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3) :425-455

Ahuja, G. and Lampert, C. M. (2001). Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms creates breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 521-543.

Ahuja, G and Katila, R. (2001). Technological acquisition and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 22:197-220.

Almeida, P. 1996. Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: Patent citation analysis in the U.S. semiconductor industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 155-165.

Almeida, P. and Kogut, B. (1997). The Exploration of Technological Diversity and the Geographic Localization of Innovation. Small Business Economics, 9, 21-31.

Beckman, C. M. and Haunschild, P. R. (2002). Network Learning: The Effects of Partners' Heterogeneity of Experience on Corporate Acquisitions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1): 92-124.

Beckman, C. M., Haunschild, P. R. and Philips, D. J. (2004). Friends or strangers? Firm-specific uncertainty, market uncertainty, and network partner selection. Organization Science, 15:259-275.

Benner, M. J. and Tushman, M. L. (2002). Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47: 676-706.

Burgers, W. P., C. W. L. Hill and W. C. Kim (1993). A theory of global strategic alliances: The case of the global auto industry. Strategic Management Journal, 14(6):419–432.

Burt, R. S. (1992). Structure Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

Cameron, A. C. And Trivedi, P. K. (1998). Regression Analysis of Count Data. Econometric Society Monograph No.30, Cambrigde University Press.

Chang, S. J. and Xu, D. (2008). Spillovers and competition among foreign and local firms in China. Strategic Management Journal, 29:495-518.

Chesbrough, H.W. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston: MA.

Chesbrough, H.W. (2006). Open innovation Business Models; How to thrive in the new innovation landscape. Harvard Business School Press, Boston: MA.

Cohen, M. D. and Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128 - 52.

Davis, G. F. (1991). Agents without principles? The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network. Administrative science Quarterly, 36:583-613.

Dosi, G. (1988). Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature, 26, 1120-1171.

Dushnitsky, G. and Lenox, M.J. (2005). When do incumbents learn from entrepreneurial ventures? Corporate venture capital and investing firm innovation rates. Research Policy, 34:615-639.

Eisenhardt, K. and C. B. Schoonhoven (1996). Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms, Organization Science, 7(2):136–150.

Geyskens, I., Steenkamp J.E.M. and Kumar N. (2006). Make, buy, or ally: A transaction cost theory meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3): 519–543. Gilsing, V. A. and Duysters, G. M. (2008). Understanding novelty creation in exploration networks—structural and relational embeddedness jointly considered. Technovation, 28, 693-708.

Gilsing, V. and Nooteboom, B. (2006). Exploration and exploitation in innovation systems: The case of pharmaceutical biotechnology. Research Policy, 35 (1):1-23.

Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3): 481-510.

Gulati, R. (1995). Social Structure and Alliance Formation Patterns: A longitudinal Analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly. 40:619-652.

Gulati. R. (1998). Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal. 19(4): 293-317.

Gulati, R. and Garguilo, M. (1999). Where do interorganizational networks come from? American Journal of Sociology, 104:1439-1493.

Gulati, R., Nohria, N., and Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal. 21:203-215.

Gulati, R. and Singh, H. (1998). The architecture of cooperation: Managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances. Administrative Science Quarterly. 4: 781-814.

Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G. and Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49 (4): 693-706.

Hagedoorn, J. (1993). Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering inter-organizational modes of cooperation and sectoral difference. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 371-385.

Hagedoorn, J. and Duysters, G. (2002). Learning in dynamic inter-firm networks: The efficacy of multiple contacts. Organization Studies, 23(4): 525-548.

Hagedoorn, J., Sadowski, B., 1999. The Transition from Strategic Technology Alliances to Mergers and Acquisitions: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Management Studies, 36(1), 87-107.

Håkansson, H. (1982). International Marketing and Purchasing of Industrial Goods: An Interaction Approach, John Wiley & Sons: New York.

Hausman, J. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46: 1251–71.

Hausman J., Hall, B. and Griliches, Z. (1984). Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship. Econometrica. 52: 909-938.

Helfat C.E. 1994. Evolutionary trajectories in petroleum firm R&D. Management Science, 40(12): 1720–1747.

Henderson, R. M. and Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 9-30.

Henderson, R. M., and Cockburn, I. (1996). Scale, Scope and Spillovers: The Determinants of Research Productivity in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Rand Journal of Economics, 26: 32-59.

Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E. Ireland, R. D. and Harrison, J. S. (1991). Effects of acquisitions on R&D inputs and outputs. Academy of Management Journal, 34:693-706.

Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E. and H. Kim (1997). International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal, 40(4), 767-798.

Hoetker, G., & Agarwal, R. 2007. Death hurts, but it isn’t fatal: The postexit diffusion of knowledge created by innovative companies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 446-467.

Howells, J. (2006). Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Research Policy, 35(5): 715-728.

Hunt, S. D. and R. M. Morgan. (1997). Resource advantage theory: a general theory of competition? Journal of Marketing, 61(3): 74-82.

Ibarra, H. (1993). Network centrality, power, and innovation involvement: Determinants of tehnical and administrative roles. Academy of Management Journal, 36:471-501.

Jaffe, A. B. (1986). Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms’ patents, profits and market value. American Economic Review, 76: 984-1001.

Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M. & Henderson, R. M. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent data. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108: 577-598

Kachra, A. and White, R.E. (2008). Know-how transfer: The role of social, economic/competitive, and firm boundary factors. Strategic Management Journal, 29:425-445.

Katila, R. (2002). New product search over time: Past ideas in there prime? Academy of Management Journal, 45(5): 995-1010.

Katila, R. and Ahuja, G. (2002). Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6): 1183-1194.

Keil, T., M. Maula, H. Schildt, and S.A. Zahra (2008). The effect of governance modes and relatedness of external business development activities on innovation performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(8): 895–907.

Kleinschmidt, E.J. and Cooper, R.G. (1991). The impact of product innovativeness on performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 8:240-251.

Kogut B. 1988. A study of the life cycle of joint ventures. In: Contractor, F., Lorange, P. (Eds.), Cooperative Strategies in International Business. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA, pp. 169–186.

Kogut B. 1989. The stability of joint ventures: reciprocity and competitive rivalry. Journal of Industrial Economics, 38, 183–198.

Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3): 383-397.

Lavie, D. and Ronsenkopf, L. (2006). Balancing Exploration and Exploitation Alliance Formation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4): 797-818.

Leonard-Barton D. 1992. Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue 13: 111–126.

Leonard-Barton D. 1995. Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.

Levinthal D.A., March JG. 1993. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue 14: 95–112.

Levitt, B. and March, J. M. (1988). Organizational Learning, Annual Review of Sociology, 14: 319-338.

Lin, Z., Yang, H. B. and Demirkan, I. (2007). The performance consequences of ambidexterity in strategic alliance formations: Empirical investigation and computational theorizing. Management Science, 53 (10):1645-1658.

Long, J. S. and Freese, J. (2003). Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. Stata Press. College Station, TX.

March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1): 71-87.

March J.G. and Simon H. 1958. Organizations. Wiley: New York.

McMillan, G.S., Narin, F. and Deeds, D. L. (2000). An analysis of the critical role of public science in innovation: the case of biotechnology. Research Policy, 29(1):1-8.

Meyer, K. E. (2004). Perspectives on multinational enterprises in emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 35:259-276.

Nelson, R. and Winter, S. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press. Cambridge, MA.

Nerkar, A. (2003). Old is gold? The value of temporal exploration in the creation of new knowledge. Management Science, 49(2): 211-229.

Nerkar, A. and Roberts, P. W. (2004). Technological and product-market experience and the success of new product introductions in the pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management Journal, 25:779-799.

Nielsen, B.B., 2000. Synergies in Strategic Alliances: Motivation and Outcomes of Complementary and Synergistic Knowledge Networks. Working Paper 4-2000, Copenhagen Business School, Department of International Economics and Management.

Nooteboom, B. (1994). Innovation and Diffusion in Small Firms: Theory and Evidence, Small Business Economics. 6(5), 327–348. Nooteboom, B. (1996), Trust, opportunism and governance: A process and control model, Organization Studies, 17/6: 985-1010. Nooteboom, B. (1999). Inter-Firm Alliances: Analysis and Design. Routledge, London. Nooteboom, B. (2000a). Learning and Innovation in Organizations and Economies, New York: Oxford University Press.

Nooteboom, B. (2000b). Institutions and Forms of Co-ordination in Innovation Systems. Organization Studies. 21(5): 915-939.

Nooteboom, B. (2002). Trust: forms, foundations, functions, failures and figures, Edgar Elgar: Cheltenham UK.

Nooteboom, B. (2004a). Competence and governance: How can they be combined? Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 28 (4): pp. 505-526.

Nooteboom, B. (2004b). Inter-firm Collaboration, Learning and Networks: An Integrated Approach. London: Routledge.

Nooteboom, B., Vanhaverbeke, W., Gilsing, V., Duysters, G. and Van den Oord, A. (2007). Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity, Research Policy, 36: 1016–1034.

Patel, P. and Pavitt, K. (1997). The techonological competencies of the world’s largest firms: Complex and path-dependent, but not much variety. Research Policy, 26:141-156.

Peri, G. (2005). Determinants of knowledge flows and their effects on innovation. Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(2), 308-322.

Phene, A., Fladmoe-Lindquist, K. and Marsh, L. (2006). Breakthrough innovations in the U.S. biotechnology industry: the effects of technological space and geographic origin. Strategic Management Journal, 27 (4):369-388.

Pisano, G. (1989) The R&D boundaries of the firm: an empirical analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1): 109–126.

Podolny, J. M. . (2001) Networks as the Pipes and Prisms of the Market. American Journal of Sociology 107(1): 33-60.

Powell, W. W. and Brantley, P. (1992). Competitive Cooperation in Biotechnology: Learning through Networks. In N. Nohria and R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and Organization, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Puranam, P. and Srikanth, K. (2007). What they know vs. what they do: how acquirers leverage technology acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 805–825.

Rigby and Zook (2002). Open market innovation, Harvard Business Review, Oct 2002, 80-89

Rosenkopf, L. and Nerkar, A. (2001). Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 287-306.

Rothaermel, F. (2001). Incumbent's advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 687-699.

Rothaermel, F. T. and Deeds, D. L. (2004). Exploration and Exploitation Alliances in Biotechnology: A System of New Product Development. Strategic Management Journal, 25(3): 201-222.

Rothaermel, F. and Hess A. M. (2007). Building Dynamic Capabilities: Innovation Driven by Individual-, Firm-, and Network-Level Effects. Organization Science, 18(6): 898-921.

Rothaermel, F. and Thursby M. (2007). The nanotech versus the biotech revolution: Sources of productivity in incumbent firm research. Research Policy, 36(6): 832-849.

Santoro, M.D., McGill, J.P., 2005. The Effect of Uncertainty and Asset Co-specialization on Governance in Biotechnology Alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 1261-1269.

Schildt, H.A., Maula, M.V.J. and Keil, T. (2005). Explorative and exploitative learning from external corporate ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(4): 493-515.

Schrader, S. (1991). Informal technology transfer between firms: Cooperation through information trading. Research Policy, 20:153-170.

Schumpeter, J. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Shan, W. (1990). An Empirical Analysis of Organizational Strategies by Entrepreneurial High-technology Firms. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 129-139.

Sidhu, J. S., Volberda, H. W. and Commandeur, H. R. (2004). Exploring Exploration Orientation and its Determinants: Some Empirical Evidence. Journal of Management Studies 41(6):913-932.

Simons, J. (2006). Big Pharma’s New R and D Center: The Trash Bin. Fortune, (European edt.) 154(12): 28

Sorenson J.B. and Stuart T.E.. (2000). Aging, obsolescence and organizational innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 81–112. Stuart, T. E. (1998). Network positions and propensities to collaborate: An investigation of strategic alliances formation in a high-technology industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 668-698.

Stuart, T. E. (2000). Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates in high-technology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 791-811.

Stuart T.E., Hoang, H. and Hybels, R. (1999). Interorganizational Endorsements and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly 44 (2): 315–49.

Tanriverdi, H. and Venkatraman, N. (2005). Knowledge Relatedness and the Performance of Multi-business Firms. Strategic Management Journal, 26(2), 97-119.

Van de Vrande, V., Lemmens, C. and Vanhaverbeke, W. (2006). Choosing governance modes for external technology sourcing. R&D Management, 36(3): 347-363.

Van de Vrande, V. (2007). Not Invented here: Managing Corporate Innovation in a New Era, PhD dissertation, Eindhoven Centre for Innovation Studies, Eindhoven University of Technology, the Netherlands.

Van de Vrande, V., Vanhaverbeke, W., and Duysters, G. (2009), External Technology Sourcing: The Effect of Uncertainty on Governance Mode Choice. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(1): 62-80.

Vanhaverbeke, W., Duysters, G., Noorderhaven, N., 2002. External Technology Sourcing Through Alliances or Acquisitions: An Analysis of the Application-Specific Integrated Circuits Industry. Organization Science 13(6), 714-733.

Villalonga, B., McGahan, A.M., 2005. The Choice among Acquisitions, Alliances and Divestures. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 1183-1208.

Von Hippel, E. (1988). The source of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

Von Hippel, E. (1986). Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Science, 32(7), 791-805.

Von Hippel, E., S. Thomke and M. Sonnack (1999). Creating breakthroughs at 3M. Harvard Business Review, 77(5), 47-57.

Wiersema, M. F. and H. P. Bowen (2008). Corporate diversification: the impact of foreign competition, industry globalization, and product diversification. Strategic Management Journal, 29(2), 115-132.

Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Anti-trust Implications. New York: The Free Press, NY.

Williamson, O.E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets and Relational Contracting. Free Press, New York, NY

Williamson, O. E. (1991). Strategizing, economizing, and economic organization. Strategic Management Journal. 12:75-94.

Williamson, O.E. (1996). Economic organization: The case for candor. Academy Management Review, 21(1), 48-57.

Zuckerman, E. W. (1999). The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the legitimacy discount.” American Journal of Sociology 104 (5): 1398–1438.

Zuckerman, E.W. (2000).. Focusing the corporate product: Securities analysts and diversification. Administrative Science Quarterly 45: 59–619.