Optimal size of government and economic growth in EU-27

Magazzino, Cosimo and Forte, Francesco (2010): Optimal size of government and economic growth in EU-27. Published in: C.R.E.I. Working Papers No. 04 (October 2010)

Abstract

Using time-series techniques and panels data, the paper analyses for the EU countries in the period 1970-2009 the existence and shape of the “BARS curve” (Barro, Armey, Rahn, and Scully), connecting the size of Government (measured by the share of public expenditure on GDP) to the rate of economic growth. Individual countries research has been conducted for 12 countries for whom enough time series were available, while panel analysis has been performed both for EU-27 and for subgroups, distinguished by their different socio-economic and monetary structures, and per capita GDP. BARS curves were generally found, and the shares of actual public expenditures generally exceed substantially those related to the maximization of GDP growth. However, great differences do emerge. For the 12 countries examined by time-series techniques, the difference between the actual level and the peak of the BARS curve ranges from 5.7 points for Germany and 18.1 points for Belgium. Panel data analysis for EU-27 shows a peak of the BARS curve at 37%, while the actual level is about 47%. While, panel data disaggregation shows a similar situation for the Western Continental Countries, with a smaller gap for Anglo-Saxon countries. For low per capita GDP countries the peak is higher than for the mature economies. So, further research may prove useful to show light on the disparities emerging in the empirical analysis of individual countries and of the panel sub-groups. However, the present research provides enough evidence that high GDP countries of EU have overcome the level of government size compatible with GDP growth rate maximization.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Government size; economic growth; BARS curve; public expenditure; EU-27.
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E62 - Fiscal Policy; H - Public Economics > H6 - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt > H60 - General; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C23 - Panel Data Models ; Spatio-temporal Models; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C22 - Time-Series Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O40 - General

References

AFONSO A., SCHUKNECHT L., TANZI V. (2002), Public Sector Efficiency: An International Comparison, European Central Bank, Working Paper, No. 242.

ALESINA et al. (2003), Fractionalization, in “Journal of Economic Growth”, vol. 8(2), June, pp. 155-194.

ALESINA A., ARDAGNA S. (2009), Large Changes in Fiscal Policy: Taxes Versus Spending, in “NBER Working Paper”, No. 15438.

ANAMAN K.A. (2004), Determinants of economic growth in Brunei Darussalam, in “Journal of Asian Economics”, 15, pp. 777-796.

ARMEY R. (1995), The Freedom Revolution, Regnery Publishing Co., Washington, D.C.

BAJO-RUBIO O. (2000), A further generalization of the Solow growth model: the role of the public sector, in “Economic Letters”, 68, pp. 79-84.

BARRO R.J. (1989), A Cross-Country Study of Growth, Saving and Government, NBER Working Paper, No. 2855.

BARRO R.J. (1990), Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth, in “Jour-nal of Political Economy”, 98(5), 103-125.

BENSON B.L., JOHNSON R.N. (1986), The Lagged Impact of State and Local Taxes on Eco-nomic Activity and Political Behavior, in “Economic Inquiry”, July, pp. 389-401.

BESCI Z. (1996), Do State and Local Taxes Affect Relative State Growth?, in “Atlanta Fed-eral Reserve Bank Economic Review”, March/April, pp. 18–35.

CHAO J.C.P., GRUBEL H. (1998), Optimal Levels of Spending and Taxation in Canada, in GRUBEL H. (ed.), How to use the fiscal surplus, The Fraser Institute, Vancouver, pp. 53-68.

CHOBANOV D., MLADENOVA A. (2009), What Is the Optimum Size of Government, Insti-tute for Market Economics, August.

DALAMAGAS B. (2000), Public sector and economic growth: the Greek Experience, in “Applied Economics”, 32, pp. 277-288.

DAR A.A., AMIRKHALKHALI S. (2002), Government size, factor accumulation, and economic growth: evidence form OECD countries, in “Journal of Policy Modelling”, 24, pp. 679-692.

DAVIES A. (2008), Human Development and the Optimal Size of Government, in “Journal of Socio-Economics”.

FEDELI S., FORTE F. (2010), Public Debt and unemployment growth: the needs for fiscal and monetary rules. Evidence from OECD countries (1970-2009), XXII S.I.E.P. Annual Meetings, 20-21 September, Pavia.

FELDSTEIN M. (1997), How Big Government Should Be?, in “National Tax Journal”, vol. L, No. 2, pp. 197-213.

FÖLSTER S., HENREKSON F. (2001), Growth effects of government expenditure and taxation in rich countries, in “European Economic Review” 45(8), pp. 1501-1520.

FORTE F. (ed., 2008), Money, Markets and Morals, Accedo, Munchen.

FORTE F., LO FASO S. (eds., 1998), Le regole della costituzione fiscale, in “Notizie di Poli-teia”, a. XIV, n. 49-50.

FORTE F., PEACOCK A.T. (eds., 1985), Public Expenditure and Government Growth, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

FRATIANNI M., SPINELLI F. (1982), The growth of government in Italy: Evidence from 1861 to 1979, in “Public Choice”, 39, pp. 221-243.

FRIEDMAN F. (1997), If Only the U.S. Were as Free as Hong Kong, “Wall Street Journal”, July 8, p. A14.

GARRETT T.A., RHINE R.M. (2006), On the Size and Growth of Government, in “Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review”, January-February, pp. 13-30.

GHALI K.H. (1998), Government size and economic growth: evidence from a multivariate cointegra-tion analysis, in “Applied Economics”, 31, pp. 975-987.

GRIER K., TULLOCK G. (1989), An empirical analysis of cross-national economic growth, 1951-1980, in “Journal of Monetary Economics”, vol. 24, pp. 48-69.

GROSSMAN P. (1987), The Optimal Size of Government, in “Public Choice”, vol. 56.

GUPTA S. et al. (2001), Transition Economies: How Appropriate Is the Size and Scope of Gov-ernment?, International Monetary Fund, Washington.

GUSEH J.S. (1997), Government size and economic growth in developing countries: A political-economy framework, in “Journal of Macroeconomics”, 19, pp. 175-192.

GWARTNEY J., LAWSON R., HOLCOMBE R. (1998), The size and functions of government and economic growth, in “Joint Economic Committee”.

HACRO A.N. (2009), Size of Government and Growth Rate of Per Capita Income in Selected Asian Developing Economics, in “International Research Journal of Finance and Eco-nomics”, i. 28, pp. 52-65.

HEITGER B. (2001), The Scope of Government and Its Impact on Economic Growth in OECD Countries, Kiel Working Papers, No. 1034, April.

HONDROYIANNIS G., PAPAPETROU E. (1995), An Examination of Wagner’s law for Greece: A Cointegration Analysis, in “Public Finance”, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 67-79.

ILLARIONOV A., PIVAROVA N. (2002), Size of Government and Economic Growth, in “Vo-prosy Economiki”.

KENNEDY P.E. (2000), On measuring the growth-maximizing tax rate, in “Pacific Economic Review”, 5(1), pp. 89–91.

KUSTEPELI Y. (2005), The Relationship Between Government Size and Economic Growth: Evi-dence From a Panel Data Analysis, in “Dokuz Eylül University-Faculty of Business-Department of Economics Discussion Paper Series”, No. 05/06, November-December.

LIND H., GRANQVIST R.(2010), A Note on the Concept of Excess Burden, in “Economic Analysis & Policy”, Vol. 40, No. 1, March, pp. 63-73.

MAGAZZINO C. (2008), Modelli interpretativi della dinamica della spesa pubblica e “curva di Armey”: il caso italiano, 1862-2001, in “Notizie di Politeia”, a. XXIV, n. 92, pp. 45-60.

MAGAZZINO C. (2009), Stima della spesa pubblica italiana secondo i modelli di Musgrave e Rostow e di O’Connor, ne “Il Risparmio Review”, a. LVII, n. 3, July-September, pp. 59-84.

MAGAZZINO C. (2010a), “Wagner’s Law” in Italy: Empirical Evidence from 1960 to 2008, in “Global & Local Economic Review”, vol. 14, n. 1, January-June, pp. 91-116.

MAGAZZINO C. (2010b), Dimensioni ottimali dell’operatore pubblico e crescita economica, ne “Il Risparmio Review”, a. LVIII, n. 1, January-March, pp. 5-33.

MAGAZZINO C. (2010c), La politica economica di Margaret Thatcher, FrancoAngeli, Milano, 2010.

MUSGRAVE R.A. (1969), Fiscal Systems, Yale University Press, New Haven.

MUSGRAVE R.A., PEACOCK A.T. (1967), Classics in the Theory of Public Finance, Macmil-lan, London.

OSBAND K., VAN RIJCKEGHEN C. (2000), Safety from currency crashes, IMF Staff Papers, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 238-258.

PEDEN E.A. (1991), Productivity in the United States and Its Relationship to Government Activ-ity: An Analysis of 57 Years, 1929-1986, in “Public Choice”, 69, pp. 153-173.

PEDEN E.A., BRADLEY M.D. (1989), Government size, productivity and economic growth: The post war experience, in “Public Choice”, 61/3, pp. 229-245.

PEVCIN P. (2003), Does Optimal Size Of Government Spending Exist?, University of Ljubl-jana, typewritten.

PEVCIN P. (2004), Economic Output and the Optimal Size of Government, in “Economic and Business Review”, 6(3), pp. 213-227.

PEVCIN P. (2008), The Issue Of The Economically Preferred Size Of Government, E.A.B.R. & T.L.C. Conference Proceedings, Salzburg.

POULSON B.W., KAPLAN J.G. (2008), State Income Taxes and Economic Growth, in “Cato Journal”, vol. 28, No. 1, Winter.

RAHN R., FOX H. (1996), What Is the Optimum Size of Government, Vernon K. Krieble Foundation.

REINHART C.M., ROGOFF K.S. (2010), Growth in a Time of Debt, in “American Eco-nomic Review”, May.

ROSTOW W.W. (1971), Politics and the Stages of Growth, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

SCULLY G.W. (1994), What Is the Optimal Size of Government in the United States?, National Centre for Policy Analysis - Policy Report, No. 188.

SCULLY G.W. (1995), The ‘growth tax’ in the United States, in “Public Choice”, 85(1–2), pp. 71–80.

SCULLY G.W. (1996), Taxation and economic growth in New Zealand, in “Pacific Economic Review”, 1(2), pp. 169–177.

SCULLY G.W. (1998), Measuring the Burden of High Taxes, National Centre for Policy Analysis Policy Report, No. 215.

SCULLY G.W. (1999), Unfinished reform: taxation and economic growth in New Zealand, in “Journal of Private Enterprise”, 14(2), pp. 92–114.

SCULLY G.W. (2000), The Growth-Maximizing Tax Rate, in “Pacific Economic Review”, Vol. 5, No 1.

SCULLY G.W. (2002), Economic Freedom, Government Policy and the Trade-Off Between Equity and Economic Growth, in “Public Choice”, 113, pp. 77-96.

SCULLY G.W. (2003), Optimal taxation, economic growth and income inequality, in “Public Choice”, 115, pp. 299–312.

SIEPER E. (1997), Review by E. Sieper of Gerald W. Scully, ‘Taxation and economic growth in New Zealand’.

TANZI V., SCHUKNECHT L. (1997a), Reconsidering the Fiscal Role of Government: The Inter-national Perspective, in “American Economic Review”, 87, pp. 164-168.

TANZI V., SCHUKNECHT L. (1997b), Reforming Government: An Overview Over the Recent Experience, in “European Journal of Political Economy”, 3, pp. 395-417.

TANZI V., SCHUKNECHT L. (1998a), The Growth of Government and the Reform of the State in Industrial Countries, in SOLIMANO A. (ed.), Social Inequality: Values, Growth, and the State, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, pp. 171-207.

TANZI V., SCHUKNECHT L. (1998b), Can Small Governments Secure Social and Economic Well-Being?, in GRUBEL H. (ed.), How to Spend the Fiscal Dividend: What Is the Optimal Size of Government?, The Fraser Institute, Vancouver.

TANZI V., SCHUKNECHT L. (2007), La spesa pubblica nel XX secolo. Una prospettiva globale, Firenze University Press, Firenze.

VEDDER R.K., GALLAWAY L.E. (1998), Government Size and Economic Growth, Joint Economic Committee.

WAGNER A.H. (1883), Finanzwissenschaft, Winter, Leipzig.

YAVAS A. (1998), Does too much government investment retard economic development of a country, in “Journal of Economic Studies”, 25(4), pp. 296-308.

YUK W. (2005), Government Size and Economic Growth: Time-Series Evidence for the United Kingdom, 1830-1993, in “Econometrics Working Paper”, Department of Economics-University of Victoria.