Marjit, Sugata and Roy, Ranjan (2010): Conflicting Measures of Poverty and Inadequate Saving by the Poor – The Role of Status Driven Utility Function.
Download (163kB) | Preview
In presence of inequality a status driven utility function reconciles the conflict between income based and nutrition based measures of poverty. Moreover, it can explain why the poor tend to save less, an established empirical fact in the developing countries. The result is independent of the assumption of imperfect capital market. The paper attempts to integrate various strands of literature on status effects.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Conflicting Measures of Poverty and Inadequate Saving by the Poor – The Role of Status Driven Utility Function|
|English Title:||Conflicting Measures of Poverty and Inadequate Saving by the Poor – The Role of Status Driven Utility Function|
|Keywords:||Inequality, Inter-temporal consumer choice, Utility, Poverty,|
|Subjects:||D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D11 - Consumer Economics: Theory
D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
D - Microeconomics > D9 - Intertemporal Choice > D91 - Intertemporal Household Choice ; Life Cycle Models and Saving
I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty
|Depositing User:||sugata marjit|
|Date Deposited:||23. Dec 2010 07:35|
|Last Modified:||23. Apr 2015 20:19|
Banerjee, A and Duflo,E (2007). "The Economic Lives of the Poor," Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 21(1), pp 141-168.
Beath, J and Fitzroy, F. (2010). “Status, Hapiness and Relative Income,” mimeo, University of St. Andrews.
Cole,H. L , Mailath, G.J and Postlewaite, A. (1992). “Social Norms, Savings Behavior, and Growth”, Journal of Political Economy”. 100( 6), pp 1092.
Corneo, G and Jeanne, O. (1998.) "Social organization, status, and savings behavior," Journal of Public Economics, 70(1), pp 37-51.
Deaton, A. and Drèze, J (2009) “Food and Nutrition in India: Facts and Interpretations,” Economic and Political Weekly, 44(7), pp. 42-65. Fafchamps, M. and Shilpi, F.(2008). "Subjective welfare, isolation, and relative consumption," Journal of Development Economics, 86(1), pp 43-60, . Galor, O. and Zeira, J. (1993). "Income Distribution and Macroeconomics," Review of Economic Studies, 60(1), pp 35-52. Ghiglino, C and Goyal, S (2008). “Keeping up with the neighbors: social interaction in a market economy”, mimeo, University of Essex.
Hopkins, E and Kornienko, T (2010). “Which Inequality? The Inequality of Endowments Versus the Inequality of Rewards”, mimeo, University of Edinburgh.
Kanbur, R. and Toumala, M. (2009). “Relativity, Inequality and Optimal Nonlinear Income Taxation”, mimeo, University of Tampere.
Ku, H and Salmon, T. C. (2009). “Incentive Effects of Inequality and Economic Development”, mimeo, Florida State University.
Moav, O. and Neeman, Z. (2010). “ Status and Poverty”, Journal of the European Economic Association, 8( 2-3), pp 413-420.
Patnaik, U (2007). “ Neoliberalism and Rural Poverty in India”, Economic and Political Weekly, 42(30) 28th July, pp 3132-50.
Sivanathan,N. and Pettit, N. C. (2010). “Protecting the self through consumption: Status goods as affirmational commodities”, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46( 3), pp 564-570