Public expenditure and revenue in Italy, 1862-1993

Magazzino, Cosimo and Dalena, Michele (2010): Public expenditure and revenue in Italy, 1862-1993.

Abstract

This study examines the long-run equilibrium relationship between government expenditure and revenue in Italy from 1862 to 1993, using cointegration techniques and the direction of causality relationship in the long and short runs between the variables through integrating the Error Correction Model (ECM) into the traditional Granger causality test. A Granger non-causality test (due to Toda and Yamamoto) is also performed. Unit root tests have been applied in order to investigate the stationarity properties of the series. Moreover, three more homogeneous sub-period (1862-1913; 1914-1946; 1947-1993) have been analyzed. The nexus between public expenditure and revenue has been discussed also by Impulse Response Functions (IRFs) and Forecast Error Variance Decompositions (FEVDs). Empirical findings show how, for each sub-period, the policy adopted reflect the prevailing paradigm of public finance (neutral or orthodox finance, Keynesian finance and discretionary or compensatory finance, respectively).

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Government expenditure; government revenue; stationarity; cointegration; causality; spend and tax; tax and spend; Italy
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E62 - Fiscal Policy; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C50 - General; H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H20 - General; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B2 - History of Economic Thought since 1925 > B22 - Macroeconomics; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C22 - Time-Series Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes

References

Ahiakpor J.C.W., Amirkhalkhali S. (1989), On the Difficulty of Eliminating Deficits with Higher Taxes: Some Canadian Evidence, Southern Economic Journal, 56, 1, July, 24-31.

Alavirad A. (2003), The effect of inflation on government revenue and expenditure: the case of the Islamic Republic of Iran, OPEC Review, December, 331-341.

Al-Foul B.A., Baghestani H. (2004), The Causal Relation between Government Revenue and Spending: Evidence from Egypt and Jordan, Journal of Economics and Finance, 28. 2, Summer, 260-269.

Al-Hakami, A.O. (2002) Analyzing the Causal Relationship Between Government Ex-penditure and Revenues in Saudi Arabia, Employing Cointegration and Granger Causality Models, Public Administration, 42(3), 475-493.

Al-Qudair K.H.A. (2005), The Relationship Between Government Expenditure and Revenues in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Testing for Cointegration and Causality, JKAU, 19, 1, 31-43.

Anderson W., Wallace M.S., Warner J.T. (1986), Government Spending and Taxation: What Causes What?, Southern Economic Journal, 52, 3, January, 630-639.

Baghestani H., McNown R. (1994), Do Revenues or Expenditures Respond to Budgetary Disequilibria?, Southern Economic Journal, 61, 2, October, 311-322.

Barro R.J. (1974), Are Government Bonds Net Wealth?, Journal of Political Economy, No-vember/December, 1095-1118.

Borcherding T.E. (1985), The Causes of Government Expenditure Growth: A Survey of the U.S. Evidence, Journal of Public Economics, 28, 359-382.

Brosio G., Marchese C. (1986), Il potere di spendere. Economia e storia della spesa pubblica dall’Unificazione ad oggi, Bologna: il Mulino.

Brennan G., Buchanan J.M. (1985), The Reason of Rules. Constitutional Political Economy, , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Buchanan J.M., Wagner R.W. (1977), Democracy in Deficit, New York: Academic Press.

Chang T., Liu W.R., Caudill S.B. (2002), Tax-and-spend, spend-and-tax, or fiscal syn-chronization: new evidence for ten countries, Applied Economics, 34, 1553-1561.

De Castro F., González-Páramo J.M:, and De Cos P.H. (2004), Fiscal Consolidation in Spain: Dynamic Interdependence of Public Spending and Revenues, Investigaciones Económicas, XXVIII, 001, 193-207.

De Viti De Marco A. (1893), La pressione tributaria dell’imposta e del prestito, Giornale degli Economisti, s. II, a. IV, Vol. VI, January, 38-67.

De Viti De Marco A. (1898), Saggi di economia e finanza, Giornale degli Economisti, 61-123.

De Viti De Marco A. (1934), Principii di economia finanziaria, Torino: Einaudi.

Doré O., Nachega J.-C. (2000), Budgetary Convergence in the WAEMU: Adjustment Through Revenue or Expenditure?, IMF Working Paper, June.

Eita J.H., Mbazima D. (2008), The Causal Relationship Between Government Expendi-ture and Revenue in Namibia, MPRA, 9154.

Ewing B.T., Payne J.E., Thompson M.A., Al-Zoubi M.T. (2006), Government Expenditures and Revenues: Evidence from Asymmetric Modeling, Southern Economic Journal, 73, 1, July, 190-200.

Forte F., Lo Faso S. (eds., 1998), Le regole della costituzione fiscale, Notizie di Politeia, XIV, 49-50.

Forte F., Peacock A.T. (eds., 1985), Public Expenditure and Government Growth, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Fratianni M., Spinelli F. (1982), The Growth of Government in Italy: Evidence from 1861 to 1979, Public Choice, 39, 2.

Friedman M. (1972), An Economist’s Protest, New Jersey: Thomas Horton.

Friedman M. (1978), The Limitations of Tax Limitations, Policy Review, Summer, 7-14.

Galbraith J.K. (1958), The Affluent Society, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Gil-Alana L.A. (2009), Government Expenditure and Revenues: Evince of Fractional Cointegration in an Asymmetric Modeling, International Advanced Economic Researches, 15, 143-155.

Granger C.W.J. (1969), Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods, Econometrica, 37, 424-438.

Graziani A. (1877), Intorno all’aumento progressivo delle spese pubbliche, Modena.

Griziotti B. (1912), Considerazioni sui metodi limiti e problemi della scienza pura delle finanze e diritto finanziario, Roma.

Hansen A.H. (1941), Fiscal Policy and Business Cycles, New York: W. Norton.

Harris S. (1952), The New Economics, London.

Hasan M., Lincoln I. (1997), Tax then spend or spend then tax? Experience in the UK, 1961-93, Applied Economics Letters, 4, 237-239.

Hondroyiannis G., Papapetrou E. (1996), An examination of the causal relationship be-tween government spending and revenue: A Cointegration analysis, Public Choice, 89, 3-4, December, 363-374.

Huang C., Tang D.P. (1992), Government Revenue, Expenditure, and National Income: A Granger Causal Analysis of the case of Taiwan, China Economic Review, 3, 2, 135-148.

Jevcak A. (2004), The Role of Symmetry between the Revenue and the Expenditure Side of the Government Budget in the Debate about the Potential Negative Effects of Tax Competition, Economics of Planning, 37, 195-201.

Keynes J.M. (1936), The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, London: Macmil-lan.

Konukcu-Ӧnal D., Tosun A.N. (2008), Government Revenue-Expenditure Nexus: Evi-dence from Several Transitional Economies, Economic Annals, 53, 145-156.

Koren S., Stiassny A. (1998), Tax and Spend or Spend and Tax? An International Study, Journal of Policy Modeling, 20(2), 163-191.

Lemmer A., Stegarescu D. (2009), Revenue Windfalls and Expenditure Slippages: Disappointing Implementation of the Reformed Stability and Growth Pact, Intereconomics, May-June, 159-165.

Lerner A.P. (1946), The Economics of Control, New York: Macmillan.

Lerner A.P. (1969), Finanza funzionale e debito federale, in Mueller M.K., Problemi di ma-croeconomia, Milano, vol. III.

Li X. (2001), Government revenue, government expenditure, and temporal causality: evidence from China, Applied Economics, 33, 485-497.

Lindahl E. (1939), Studies in the Theory of Money and Capital, London: George Allen.

Magazzino C. (2008), Modelli interpretativi della dinamica della spesa pubblica e “curva di Armey”: il caso italiano, 1862-2001, Notizie di Politeia, XXIV, 92, 45-60.

Magazzino C. (2009), Stima della spesa pubblica italiana secondo i modelli di Musgrave e Rostow e di O’Connor, Il Risparmio Review, LVII, 3, July-September, 59-84.

Magazzino C. (2010), “Wagner’s Law” in Italy: Empirical Evidence from 1960 to 2008, Global and Local Economic Review, 14, 1, January-June, 91-116.

Manzini A., Zarin-Nejadan M. (1995), The Causal Relationship Between Government Expenditure and Revenue: The Case of Switzerland, Swiss Journal of Economics and Sta-tistics, 131 (4/1), 637-647.

Meltzer A. H., Richard F. S. (1981), A Rational Theory of the Growth of Government, Journal of Political Economy, 89, 5, 914-927.

Merrifield J. (2000), State government expenditure determinants and tax revenue deter-minants revisited, Public Choice, 102, 25-50.

Messedaglia A. (1850), Dei prestiti pubblici e del migliore sistema di collocazione, Milano.

Miller S.M., Russek F.S. (1990), “Co-Integration and Error-Correction Models: The Temporal Causality between Government Taxes and Spending, Southern Economic Journal, 57, 1, July, 221-229.

Musgrave R.A. (1969), Fiscal Systems, New Haven: Yale University Press.

Musgrave R.A., Culbertson J.M. (1953), The Growth of Public Expenditures in the United States, 1890-1948, National Tax Journal, June.

Napoleoni C. (1962), Il problema della programmazione in Italia, Rivista Trimestrale., 1, marzo.

Narayan P.K. (2005), The government revenue and government expenditure nexus: empirical evidence from nine Asian countries, Journal of Asian Economics, 15, 1203-1216.

Nyamongo M.E., Sichei M.M., Schoeman N.J. (2007), Government revenue and expenditure nexus in South Africa, South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 2, 256-268.

Owoye O. (1995), The causal relationship between taxes and expenditures in the G7 countries: cointegration and error correction models, Applied Economic Letters, 2, 19-22.

Pantaleoni M. (1891), “Imposta e debito con riguardo alla loro pressione”, Giornale degli Economisti, luglio.

Park W.K. (1998), Granger Causality between Government Revenues and Expenditures in Korea, Journal of Economic Development, 23, 1, June, 145-155.

Payne J.E. (1997), The tax-spend debate: the case of Canada, Applied Economic Letters, 4, 381-386.

Peacock A. T., Wiseman J. (1961), The Growth of Public Expenditure in the United Kingdom, National Bureau of Economic Research.

Puviani A. (1903), Teoria della illusione finanziaria, Palermo: Sandron.

Ram R. (1988), Additional Evidence on Causality between Government Revenue and Government Expenditure, Southern Economic Journal, 54, January, 763-769.

Razzolini L., Shughart II W.F. (1997), On the (relative) unimportance of a balanced budget, Public Choice, 90, 215-233.

Ricca Salerno G. (1879), Teoria generale dei prestiti pubblici, Milano.

Samuelson P. (1983), Foundations of Economic Analysis, Harvard: Harvard University Press.

Saunoris J.W., Payne J.E. (2010), Tax more or spend less? Asymmetries in the UK revenue-expenditure nexus, Journal of Policy Modeling, 32, 478-487.

Tarschys D. (1975), The Growth of Public Expenditures: Nine Models of Explanation, Scandinavian Political Studies, 10.

Toda H.Y., Yamamoto T. (1995), Statistical Inference in Vector Autoregressions with Possibly Integrated Processes, Journal of Econometrics, 66, 225-250.

Wagner A.H. (1883), Finanzwissenschaft, Winter, Leipzig.

Wahid A.N.M. (2008), An Empirical Investigation on the Nexus between Tax Revenue and Government Spending: The Case of Turkey, International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 16, 46-51.

Wicksell K. (1896), Finanztheoretische Untersuchungen. Wildavsky A. (1964), The Politics of Budgetary Process, Boston: Little Brown.

Wolde-Rufael Y. (2008), The Revenue-Expenditure Nexus: The Experience of 13 African Countries, African Development Review, 20, 2, 273-283.

Young A.T. (2008), Tax Spend or Fiscal Illusion? Allowing for Asymmetric Revenue Effects in Expenditure error-Correction Models, April, available at the web address http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1126396.