Ismihan, Mustafa (2010): A New Framework for Output-Unemployment Relationship: Okun’s Law Revisited.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_28135.pdf Download (206kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper provides a new and useful framework for developing various models to investigate the output-unemployment relationship. By using this framework, a simple but reasonable theoretical background to Okun’s law is derived. This theoretical background, in turn, facilitates the decomposition of Okun’s law coefficient into several quantifiable and interpretable components that incorporate main insights from Arthur Okun’s original analysis. The empirical decomposition exercise indicates that Okun’s law has an inherent tendency to vary substantially over time, especially, in response to the structural changes in legal, institutional and other related characteristics of labor and goods markets.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | A New Framework for Output-Unemployment Relationship: Okun’s Law Revisited |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | output-unemployment relationship; Okun’s law |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles > E32 - Business Fluctuations ; Cycles E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E24 - Employment ; Unemployment ; Wages ; Intergenerational Income Distribution ; Aggregate Human Capital ; Aggregate Labor Productivity C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables |
Item ID: | 28135 |
Depositing User: | Mustafa Ismihan |
Date Deposited: | 18 Jan 2011 20:06 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 15:36 |
References: | Altig, D., Fitzgerald, T.J., Rupert, P., 1997. Okun’s law revisited: should we worry about low unemployment? Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Economic Commentary, May 15. http://www.clevelandfed.org/research/commentary/1997/0515.htm (accessed February 27, 2007). Ball, N., Koenig, E.F., 2009. Recent unemployment increases break the law. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas National Economic Update, June 29. http://dallasfed.org/research/update-us/2009/0904.cfm (accessed December 17, 2009). Bertola, G., 1990. Job security, employment and wages. European Economic Review 34(4), 851-79. Blanchard, O.J., 2006. Macroeconomics. 4th ed., Prentice Hall, New Jersey. Blanchard, O.J., Quah, D., 1989. The dynamic effects of aggregate demand and supply disturbances. American Economic Review 79(4), 655-73. Blinder, A.S., 1997. Is there a core of practical macroeconomics that we should all believe? American Economic Review Proceedings 87(2), 240-43. Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R.J., 2005. The consequences of labor market flexibility: panel evidence based on survey data. European Economic Review 49(5), 1225-59. Fay, J.A., Medoff, J.L., 1985. Labor and output over the business cycle: some direct evidence. American Economic Review 75(4), 638-655. Gordon, R.J., 1973. The welfare cost of higher unemployment. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1, 133-205. Gordon, R.J., 1984. Unemployment and potential output in the 1980s. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2, 537-564. Gordon, R.J., 2010. Okun’s law and productivity innovations. American Economic Review Proceedings 100(2), 11-15. Groningen Growth and Development Centre and the Conference Board, 2007. Total Economy Database [January 2007]. http://www.ggdc.net (accessed April 17, 2007). Hagemann, H., Seiter, S., 1999. Okun’s law. In O’Hara, P.A. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Political Economy, Routledge, London, pp. 819-821. Hamada, K., Yoshio, K., 1984. The relationship between production and unemployment in Japan: okun’s law in comparative perspective. European Economic Review 25(1), 71-94. Hultgren, T., 1960. Changes in labor cost during cycles in production and business. NBER Occasional Paper 74. Kaufman, R.T., 1988. An international comparison of Okun’s law. Journal of Comparative Economics 12(2), 182-203. Knoester, A., 1986. Okun’s law revisited. Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv) 122(4), 657-66. Knotek II, E.S., Terry S., 2009. How will unemployment fare following the recession? Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas Economic Review (Third Quarter), 5-33. Krugman, P.R., 2009. Stimulus arithmetic (wonkish but important). New York Times, January 6. Kugler, A.D., 2004. The effect of job security regulations on labor market flexibility: evidence from the Colombian labor market reform. NBER Working Paper 10215. Lee, J., 2000. The robustness of Okun’s law: evidence from OECD countries. Journal of Macroeconomics 22(2), 331-56. Mairesse, J., 1984. Comment on ‘The relationship between production and unemployment in Japan: Okun’s law in comparative perspective’ by K. Hamada and Y. Kurosaka. European Economic Review 25(1), 99-105. Moosa, I.A., 1997. A cross-country comparison of Okun’s coefficient. Journal of Comparative Economics 24(3), 335-56. Oi, W.Y., 1962. Labor as a quasi fixed factor. Journal of Political Economy 70(6), 538-55. Okun, A.M., 1962. Potential GNP: its measurement and significance. Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section of the American Statistical Association, 98-104. Paldam, M., 1987. How much does one percent of growth change the unemployment rate? A study of 17 OECD countries, 1948-1985. European Economic Review 31(1-2), 306-13. Perry, G.L., 2000. Is macroeconomics dead? (opinion) The International Economy (September/October 2000) 14 (5), 21. Prachowny, M. F.J. 1993. Okun’s law: theoretical foundations and revised estimates. Review of Economics and Statistics 75(2), 331-36. Ravn, M.O., Uhlig, H., 2002. On adjusting the Hodrick-Prescott filter for the frequency of observations. Review of Economics and Statistics 84(2), 371-375. Sheehan, R.G., Zahn, F., 1980. The variability of the Okun coefficient. Southern Economic Journal 47(2), 488-97. Silvapulle, P., Moosa, I.A., Silvapulle, M.J., 2004. Asymmetry in Okun’s law. Canadian Journal of Economics 37(2), 353-374. Sögner, L., Stiassny A., 2002. An analysis on the structural stability of Okun’s law: a cross-country study. Applied Economics 34(14), 1775-1787. US Congressional Budget Office [CBO], 2004. A summary of alternative methods for estimating potential GDP. Background Paper, March 2004, CBO, Washington. US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2007. Comparative Civilian Labor Force Statistics, Ten Countries, 1960-2006 [20 March 2007]. http://www.bls.gov /fls/flscomparelf.htm (accessed April 17, 2007). Weber, C.E., 1995. Cyclical output, cyclical unemployment, and Okun’s coefficient: a new approach. Journal of Applied Econometrics 10(4), 433-45. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/28135 |