Veneziani, Roberto (2008): Exploitation, inequality, and power.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_30288.pdf Download (237kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The concept of exploitation is central in social and political theory, but there is no precise, widely accepted definition. This paper analyses John Roemer’s seminal theory, which construes exploitation as a distributive injustice arising from asset inequalities, with no reference to notions of power or dominance. First, an intertemporal generalisation of Roemer’s static economies is set up and several doubts are raised on the claim that exploitation can be reduced to a kind of resource egalitarianism. Then, Roemer’s philosophical arguments that exploitation should be defined as a merely distributive concept are also questioned and it is argued that a notion of power, or dominance, is an essential part of the definition of exploitation. Finally, Roemer’s path-breaking methodological claim that standard general equilibrium models can provide robust microfoundations to exploitation and classes is critically analysed.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Exploitation, inequality, and power |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Exploitation; inequality; power |
Subjects: | B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B51 - Socialist ; Marxian ; Sraffian D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C61 - Optimization Techniques ; Programming Models ; Dynamic Analysis |
Item ID: | 30288 |
Depositing User: | Roberto Veneziani |
Date Deposited: | 22 Apr 2011 11:56 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 11:10 |
References: | Amariglio, Jack, Callari, Antonio, and Stephen Cullenberg (1989) ‘Analytical Marxism: A Critical Overview’, Review of Social Economy 47: 415-32. Anderson, William H.L. and Frank W. Thompson (1988) ‘Neoclassical Marxism’, Science and Society 52: 215-28. Bigwood, Rick (2003) Exploitative Contracts, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Bowles, Samuel and Herbert Gintis (1990) ‘Contested Exchange: New Microfoundations of the Political Economy of Capitalism’, Politics and Society 18: 165-222. Buchanan, Allen E. (1987) ‘Marx, Morality, and History: An Assessment of Recent Analytical Work on Marx’, Ethics 98: 104-36. Carling, Alan H. (1997) ‘Analytical and Essential Marxism’, Political Studies 45: 768-83. Cohen, Gerald A. (1995) Self-ownership, freedom and equality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Devine, James and Gary Dymski, (1991) ‘Roemer’s ‘General’ Theory of Exploitation is a Special Case’, Economics and Philosophy 7: 235-75. Diquattro, Arthur (1998) ‘Liberal theory and the idea of communist justice’, American Political Science Review 92: 83-96. Dymski, Gary and John E. Elliott (1989a) ‘The Taxonomy of Primary Exploitation’, Review of Social Economy 47: 338-76. Dymski, Gary and John E. Elliott (1989b) ‘Should Anyone Be Interested In Exploitation?’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy Suppl. Vol. 15: 333-74. Elster, Jon (1982) ‘Roemer versus Roemer’, Politics and Society 11: 363-73. Elster, Jon (1985) Making sense of Marx, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Federal Ministry of Health of Nigeria (2001) Report of the Investigation Committee on the Clinical Trial of Trovan by Pfizer in Kano (1996), available at www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/world/documents/Clinical_Trial_Report.pdf Field, Martha A. (1989) Surrogate Motherhood, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Foley, Duncan K. (1989) ‘Roemer on Marx on Exploitation’, Economics and Politics 1: 187-99. Goldstein, Jonathan (2006) ‘Marxian Microfoundations: Contribution or Detour?’, Review of Radical Political Economics 38: 569-94. Hart, Oliver D. (1995) Firms, Contracts, and Financial Structure, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hodgson, Geoffrey M. (1989) ‘Marxism without Tears: A Review of John E. Roemer’s “Free to Lose”’, Review of Social Economy 47: 433-36. Howard, Michael C. and John E. King (1989) ‘The Rational Choice Marxism of John Roemer: A Critique’, Review of Social Economy 47: 392-414. Hunt, E. K. (1992) ‘Analytical Marxism’, in Bruce Roberts and Susan Feiner (eds) Radical economics, Boston: Kluwer. Hunt, Ian (1986) ‘A Critique of Roemer, Hodgson and Cohen on Marxian Exploitation’, Social Theory and Practice 12: 121-71. International Labour Office (2005) Human trafficking and Forced Labour Exploitation, Geneva: International Labour Office. International Labour Office (2006) The end of child labour: Within reach, Geneva: International Labour Office. Jacobs, Leslie A. (1996) ‘The Second Wave of Analytical Marxism’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 26: 279-92. Kymlicka, Will (2002) Contemporary Political Philosophy, 2nd Expanded Edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lebowitz, Michael (1988) ‘Is “Analytical Marxism” Marxism?’, Science and Society 52: 191-214. Levi, Margaret and Douglass C. North (1982) ‘Toward a Property-Rights Theory of Exploitation’, Politics and Society 11: 315-20. Levine, Andrew (2003) A Future for Marxism?, London: Pluto Press. Mandel, Ernest (1989) ‘How To Make No Sense of Marx,’ Canadian Journal of Philosophy Suppl. Vol. 15: 105-32. Mayer, Thomas F. (1994) Analytical Marxism, London: Sage. Nielsen, Kai and Robert Ware (1997) (eds) Exploitation, New Jersey: Humanities. Reiman, Jeffrey (1987) ‘Exploitation, Force, and the Moral Assessment of Capitalism’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 16: 3-41. Reiman, Jeffrey (1989) ‘An Alternative to “Distributive” Marxism: Further Thoughts on Roemer, Cohen, and Exploitation’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy Suppl. Vol. 15: 299-325. Reiman, Jeffrey (1990) ‘Why Worry about How Exploitation Is Defined? Reply to John Roemer’, Social Theory and Practice 16: 101-13. Ripstein, Arthur (1989) ‘Rationality and Alienation’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Suppl. Vol. 15: 449-66. Roemer, John E. (1981) Analytical Foundations of Marxian Economic Theory, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Roemer, John E. (1982a) A General Theory of Exploitation and Class, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Roemer, John E. (1982b) ‘New directions in the Marxian theory of exploitation and classes’, Politics and Society 11: 253-87. Roemer, John E. (1982c) ‘Reply’, Politics and Society 11: 375-94. Roemer, John E. (1982d) ‘Property Relations vs. Surplus Value in Marxian Exploitation’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 11: 281-313. Roemer, John E. (1985) ‘Should Marxists be interested in exploitation?’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 14: 30-65. Roemer, John E. (1986a) Value, exploitation, and class, New York: Harwood Academic Publishers. Roemer, John E. (1986b) ‘“Rational choice” Marxism: some issues of method and substance, in J. E. Roemer (ed) Analytical Marxism, pp. 191-201, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Roemer, John E. (1988) Free to Lose, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Roemer, John E. (1989a) ‘Marxism and Contemporary Social Science’, Review of Social Economy 47: 377-91. Roemer, John E. (1989b) ‘Second Thoughts on Property Relations and Exploitation’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy Suppl. Vol. 15: 257-66. Roemer, John E. (1989c) ‘What is Exploitation? Reply to Jeffrey Reiman’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 18: 90-7. Roemer, John E. (1992) ‘What Walrasian Marxism Can and Cannot Do’, Economics and Philosophy 8: 149-56. Roemer, John E. (1994) Egalitarian Perspectives: Essays in Philosophical Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Roemer, John E. and Roberto Veneziani (2004) ‘What we owe our children, they their children…’, Journal of Public Economic Theory 6: 637-54. Ruccio, David F. (1991) ‘The Merchant of Venice, or Marxism in the Mathematical Mode’, The Social Scientist 212-213: 18-46. Sample, Ruth J. (2003) Exploitation, What it is and Why it is Wrong, Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield. Schwartz, Justin (1995a) ‘In Defence of Exploitation’, Economics and Philosophy 11: 275-307. Schwartz, Justin (1995b) ‘What’s Wrong with Exploitation?’, Nous 29: 158-88. Sensat, Julius (1984) ‘Exploitation’, Nous 18: 21-38. Skillman, Gilbert L. (1995) ‘Ne Hic Saltaveris: the Marxian Theory of Exploitation after Roemer’, Economics and Philosophy 11: 309-31. SPD (2007) Hamburg Programme. Principal guidelines of the Social Democratic Party of Germany. http://parteitag.spd.de/servlet/PB/menu/1727812/index.html van Parijs, Philippe (1986) ‘A Revolution in Class Theory’, Politics and Society 15: 453-82. Veneziani, Roberto (2005) ‘Exploitation and Time’, Journal of Economic Theory, in press. Veneziani, Roberto (2008) ‘A Future for (Analytical) Marxism?’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, in press. Yoshihara, Naoki (1998) ‘Wealth, Exploitation and Labor Discipline in the Contemporary Capitalist Economy’, Metroeconomica 49: 23-61. Warren, Paul (1997) ‘Should Marxists Be Liberal Egalitarians?’, Journal of Political Philosophy 5: 47-68. Wertheimer, Alan (1996) Exploitation, Princeton: Princeton University Press. Wolff, Jonathan (1999) ‘Marx and exploitation’, The Journal of Ethics 3: 105-20. Wood, Allen (1995) ‘Exploitation’, Social Philosophy and Policy 12: 135-58. Wood, Allen (2004) Karl Marx, 2nd Expanded Edition, London: Routledge. Wood, Ellen M. (1989) ‘Rational Choice Marxism. Is the game worth the candle?’, New Left Review 177: 41-88. Wright, Erik O. (1982) ‘The Status of the Political in the Concept of Class Structure’, Politics and Society 11: 321-43. Wright, Erik O. (2000) ‘Class, Exploitation, and Economic Rents: Reflections on Sorensen’s “Sounder Basis”’, The American Journal of Sociology 105: 1559-71. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/30288 |