Yamamura, Eiji (2011): Experience of technological and natural disasters and their impact on the perceived risk of nuclear accidents after the Fukushima nuclear disaster in Japan 2011: A cross-country analysis.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_31330.pdf Download (162kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper uses cross-country data compiled immediately after the Fukushima nuclear accident to investigate how the experience of such disasters affects the perception of the risk of nuclear accidents. Estimation results show that the perceived risk of a nuclear accident is positively associated with experiencing technological disasters but not with that of natural disasters.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Experience of technological and natural disasters and their impact on the perceived risk of nuclear accidents after the Fukushima nuclear disaster in Japan 2011: A cross-country analysis |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Technological disaster, Natural disaster, Nuclear accidents, Risk, Fukushima accidents, Perception, Bayesian learning |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D84 - Expectations ; Speculations J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J28 - Safety ; Job Satisfaction ; Related Public Policy D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D83 - Search ; Learning ; Information and Knowledge ; Communication ; Belief ; Unawareness Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q54 - Climate ; Natural Disasters and Their Management ; Global Warming |
Item ID: | 31330 |
Depositing User: | eiji yamamura |
Date Deposited: | 08 Jun 2011 05:59 |
Last Modified: | 30 Sep 2019 18:47 |
References: | Berger, E.M. 2010. The Chernobyl disaster, concern about the environment and life satisfaction. Kyklos 63, 1-8. Camere, C., Kunreuther, H. 1989. Decision processes for low probability events: Policy implications. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 8(4), 565-592. Greene, W. 2008. Econometric Analysis (sixth edition). Prentice Hall, New Jersey. Kahn, M. 2007. Environmental disasters as risk regulation catalysts? The role of Bhopal, Chernobyl, Exxon Valdez, Love Canal, and Three Mile island in shaping U.S Environmental law. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 35(1), 17-43. Kunreuther, H., Pauly, M. 2004. Why don’t people insure against large loses? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 28, 5-21. Teversky, A., Hahneman, D. 1974. Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristic biases. Science 185, 1124-1231. Viscusi, W K., Zeckhauser, R.J. 2006. National survey evidence on disasters and relief: risk beliefs, self-interest and compassion. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 33,13-36. WIN-Gallup International. 2011. Global Barometer of View on Nuclear Energy after Japan Earthquake. Volume 1: Tabular Presentation of All 8 Questions Country-wise. WIN-Gallup International. Zeckhauser, R. 1996. The economics of catastrophes. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 12, 113-140. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/31330 |