Halkos, George and Tzeremes, Nickolaos and Kourtzidis, Stavros (2011): The use of supply chain DEA models in operations management: A survey.
Download (1MB) | Preview
Standard Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) approach is used to evaluate the efficiency of DMUs and treats its internal structures as a “black box”. The aim of this paper is twofold. The first task is to survey and classify supply chain DEA models which investigate these internal structures. The second aim is to point out the significance of these models for the decision maker of a supply chain. We analyze the simple case of these models which is the two-stage models and a few more general models such as network DEA models. Furthermore, we study some variations of these models such as models with only intermediate measures between first and second stage and models with exogenous inputs in the second stage. We define four categories: typical, relational, network and game theoretic DEA models. We present each category along with its mathematical formulations, main applications and possible connections with other categories. Finally, we present some concluding remarks and opportunities for future research.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||The use of supply chain DEA models in operations management: A survey|
|Keywords:||Supply chain; Data envelopment analysis; Two-stage structures; Network structures|
|Subjects:||C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C14 - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C61 - Optimization Techniques ; Programming Models ; Dynamic Analysis
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C70 - General
|Depositing User:||Nickolaos Tzeremes|
|Date Deposited:||26. Jun 2011 10:19|
|Last Modified:||13. Feb 2013 09:40|
Bendoly E., Rosenzweig E.D. and Stratman J.K. 2009. The efficient use of enterprise information for strategic advantage: A data envelopment analysis. Journal of Operations Management, 27, 310-323.
Charnes A., Cooper W.W. and Rhodes E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444.
Chen C.M. 2009. A network-DEA model with new efficiency measures to incorporate the dynamic effect in production networks. European Journal of Operational Research, 194, 687-699.
Chen Y. and Zhu J. 2004. Measuring information technology's indirect impact on firm performance. Information Technology and Management, 5, 9-22.
Chen Y., Cook W.D., Li N. and Zhu J. 2009a. Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 196, 1170-1176.
Chen Y., Liang L. and Zhu J. 2009b. Equivalence in two-stage DEA approaches. European Journal of Operational Research, 193, 600-604.
Chen Y., Liang L., Yang F. and Zhu J. 2006. Evaluation of information technology investment: a data envelopment analysis approach. Computers & Operations Research, 33, 1368-1379.
Chilingerian J. and Sherman H.D. 2004. Health care applications: From hospitals to physicians, from productive efficiency to quality frontiers. In: Cooper W.W., Seiford L.M. and Zhu J. Handbook on data envelopment analysis. Springer. Boston.
Cook W., Liang L. and Zhu J. 2010. Measuring performance of two-stage network structures by DEA: A review and future perspective. OMEGA, 38, 423-430.
Du J., Liang L., Chen Y., Cook W. and Zhu J. 2010. A bargaining game model for measuring performance of the two-stage network structures. European Journal of Operational Research, 210 (2), 390-397.
Färe R. and Grosskopf S. 1996a. Intertemporal production frontiers: with dynamic DEA. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
Färe R. and Grosskopf S. 1996b. Productivity and intermediate products: A frontier approach. Economic Letters, 50, 65-70.
Färe R. and Grosskopf S. 1997. Efficiency and productivity in rich and poor countries. Jensen B.S. and Wong K. Dynamics, economic growth and international trade. University of Michigan Press, Studies in International Economics, Ann Arbor.
Färe R. and Grosskopf S. 2000. Network DEA. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 34, 35-49. Färe R. and Whittaker G. 1995. An intermediate input model of diary production using complex survey data. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 46 (2), 201-223.
Färe R., Grabowski R. and Kraft S. 1997. Efficiency of fixed but allocatable input: A non-parametric approach. Economic Letters, 56, 187-193.
Färe R., Grosskopf S. and Lee W.F. 2004. Property rights and profitability. In: Färe R. and Grosskopf S. New directions: Efficiency and productivity. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
Färe R., Grosskopf S. and Whittaker G. 2007. Network DEA. In: Zhu J. and Cook W.D. Modeling data irregularities and structural complexities in data envelopment analysis. Springer, New York.
Hendricks K.B., Singhal V.R. and Stratman J.K. 2007. The impact of enterprise systems on corporate performance: A study of ERP, SCM and CRM system implementations. Journal of Operations Management, 25, 65-82.
Hsieh L.F. and Lin L.H. 2010. A performance evaluation model for international tourist hotels in Taiwan: An application of the relational network DEA. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29, 14-24.
Jaenicke E.C. 2000. Testing for intermediate outputs in dynamic DEA models: Accounting for soil capital in rotational crop production and productivity measures. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 14 (3), 247-266.
Kao C. 2009. Efficiency decomposition in network data envelopment analysis: A relational model. European Journal of Operational Research, 192, 949-962.
Kao C. and Hwang S. 2008. Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance in Taiwan. European Journal of Operational Research, 185, 418-429.
Kao C. and Hwang. 2010. Efficiency measurement for network systems: IT impact on firm performance. Decision Support Systems, 48, 437-446.
Lewis H.F. and Sexton T.R. 2004. Network DEA: Efficiency analysis of organizations with complex internal structure. Computers and Operations Research, 31, 1365-1410.
Liang L., Cook W. and Zhu J. 2008. DEA models for two-stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition. Naval Research Logistics, 55, 643-653.
Liang L., Yang F., Cook W. and Zhu J. 2006. DEA models for supply chain efficiency evaluation. Annals of Operational Research, 145, 35-49.
Lothgren M. and Tambour M. 1999. Productivity and customer satisfaction in Swedish pharmacies: A DEA network model. European Journal of Operational Research, 115, 449-458.
Narasimhan R., Talluri S. and Das A. 2004. Exploring flexibility and execution competencies of manufacturing firms. Journal of Operations Management, 22, 91-106.
Narasimhan R., Talluri S., Sarkis J. and Ross A. 2005. Efficient service design in government services: A decision support system framework. Journal of Operations Management, 23, 163-178.
Nemota J. and Gota M. 1999. Dynamic data envelopment analysis: modeling intertemporal behavior of a firm in the presence of productive inefficiencies. Economic Letters, 64, 51-56.
Nemota J. and Gota M. 2003. Measuring dynamic efficiency in production: An application of data envelopment analysis to Japanese electric utilities. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 19, 191-210.
O'Leary-Kelly S.W. and Flores B.E. 2002. The integration of manufacturing and marketing/sales decisions: impact on organizational performance. Journal of Operations Management, 20, 221-240.
Prieto A.M. and Zofio J.L. 2007. Network DEA efficiency in input-output models: With an application to OECD countries. European Journal of Operational Research, 178, 292-304.
Ross A. and Droge C. 2002. AN integrated benchmarking approach to distribution center performance using DEA modeling. Journal of Operations Management, 20, 19-32.
Ross A. and Droge C. 2004. An analysis of operations efficiency in large-scale distribution systems. Journal of Operations Management, 21, 673-688.
Sarkis J. 2000. An analysis of the operational efficiency of major airports in the United States. Journal of Operations Management, 18, 335-351.
Seiford and Zhu J. 1999. Profitability and marketability of the top 55 U.S. commercial banks. Management Science, 45 (9), 1270-1288.
Sexton T. and Lewis H. 2003. Two-stage DEA: An application to major league baseball. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 19, 227-249.
Shephard R.W. 1970. Theory of cost and production. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Shephard R.W. and Färe R. 1975. A dynamic theory of production correspondance. ORC UC Berkley 75-13, Berkley.
Sun S. 2004. Assessing joint shops in the Taiwanese Army using data envelopment analysis. Journal of Operations Management, 22, 233-245.
Swink M., Talluri S. and Pandejpong T. 2006. Faster, better, cheaper: A study of NPD project efficiency and performance tradeoffs. Journal of Operations Management, 24, 542-562.
Verma D. and Sinha K. 2002. Toward a theory of project interdependencies in high tech R&D environments. Journal of Operations Management, 20, 451-468. Wang C.H., Gopal R.D. and Zionts S. 1997. Use of data envelopment analysis in assessing information technology impact on firm performance. Annals of Operations Research, 73, 191-213.
Zhu J and Cook W. 2007. Modeling data irregularities and structural complexities in data envelopment analysis. Springer, Sringer Science+Business Media, LLC, New York.
Zhu J. 2000. Multi-factor performance measure model with an application to Fortune 500 companies. European Journal of Operational Research, 123, 105-124.
Zhu J. 2003. Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking: Data envelopment analysis with spreadsheets and DEA excel solver. Springer, Sringer Science+Business Media, LLC, New York.
Zhu J. 2009. Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking: Data envelopment analysis with spreadsheets. Springer, Sringer Science+Business Media, LLC, New York.