Grady, Patrick and Stephenson, Donald R. (1975): Some Macroeconomic Effects of Tax Reform and Indexing. Published in: Canadian Journal of Economics , Vol. Vol. X, (August 1977): pp. 379-392.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_31927.pdf Download (3MB) | Preview |
Abstract
The period from 1971 to 1974 was one of fundamental change in the structure of the Canadian system of taxation. From the federal budget of June 18, 1971, which brought the long process of tax reform to a close, to the introduction of the personal income tax indexing scheme, the variety and magnitude of the changes in taxation provide a particularly fruitful period for fiscal policy research.
In this paper we report upon and discuss the results of simulating a macroeconometric model that includes most of the tax reform measures and indexing. We propose to examine in some detail a number of questions arising from these changes. Generally, we are interested in the implications of tax reform and indexing for stabilization policy. More specifically, we explore two interesting questions relating to fiscal policy. First, "What has been the effect of the 1972 tax reforms and indexing on the yield and elasticity of the income tax system?" By comparing the estimated tax yield over the 1972-1978 period of the pre-reform system with that of the reformed system one can separate the effect of the changes in the structure from the effect on revenue of the current inflation under progressive taxation. In a like manner, the effect of indexing can be determined by comparing the estimated yield of an indexed with an unindexed tax system over the same period. The second question we ask is, "What has been the effect of tax reform and indexing on the built-in stability of the economy?" Here we look at a measure of built-in stability for the pre-tax reform system and for the post-tax reform system with and without indexing. In addition, we apply various expenditure shocks to the model both with and without the indexing scheme in operation. Related to this, we also administer to the model a direct price shock to ascertain the relative stabilizing properties of the various tax regimes under an imported or commodity inflation.
The model we use in our analysis is an updated version of RDX2 incorporating the revised tax system, which is well suited for this study. It is a policy model rich in structural detail, particularly in the government sector, facilitating the introduction, also in detail, of complex measures such as capital gains and indexing.
Our simulations with the tax model have lead us to draw five conclusions concerning the macroeconomic effect of tax reform and indexing. They are: (1) Contrary to the views expressed in the financial press, tax reform has not raised significantly more money. (2) Tax reform has not materially increased the elasticity of the tax system. (3) Indexing has reduced the elasticity of the personal income tax by four-tenths to within shooting distance of unity. (4) Tax reform has not had an important effect on built-in stability. (5) Indexing has reduced built-in stability with respect to certain types of shocks, and enhanced it with respect to others.
We hope that these conclusions demonstrate the utility of what is unique in our approach, that is the incorporation of a disaggregated tax model into a macroeconometric model such as RDX2.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Some Macroeconomic Effects of Tax Reform and Indexing |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | macroeconomic models, tax reform, indexing, built-in stability, income tax models |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C53 - Forecasting and Prediction Methods ; Simulation Methods H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H24 - Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and Subsidies H - Public Economics > H3 - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents > H30 - General |
Item ID: | 31927 |
Depositing User: | Patrick Grady |
Date Deposited: | 30 Jun 2011 05:52 |
Last Modified: | 02 Oct 2019 03:22 |
References: | Aitchison, J. and J.A.C. Brown. The Lognormal Distribution with Special Reference to its Uses in Economics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press,1957. Allan, J.R., D.A. Dodge and S.N. Poddar. "Indexing the Personal Income Tax: A Federal Perspective." Canadian Tax Journal, July-Aug 1974, pp 355-377. Ando, Albert, E. Cary Brown and Earl W. Adams, Jr. "Government Revenues and Expenditures." In: The Brookings Quarterly Econometric Model of the United States, edited by James S. Duesenberry [and others]. Chicago, Rand McNally, 1965, pp 538-542. Bank of Canada. The Equations of RDX2 Revised and Estimated to 4Q 1972. Ottawa, Bank of Canada, forthcoming. Bhatia, Kul. "Estimation and Taxation of Capital Gains in Canada." In: Report of Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Tax Conference Convened by the Canadian Tax Foundation. Toronto, Canadian Tax Foundation, pp 91-103. Bossons, John. "Economic Overview of the Tax Reform Legislation." In: Report of Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Tax Conference Convened b the Canadian Tax Foundation. Toronto, Canadian Tax Foundation, pp 45-67. Bossons, John and Thomas A. Wilson. "Adjusting Tax Rates for Inflation." Canadian Tax Journal, vol 21, May-June 1973, pp 185-199. Canada. Department of Finance. "Tax Indexing." Press release. Ottawa, Department of Finance, Oct 16, 1973. Canada. Department of Finance. "1975 Tax Indexing." Press release. Ottawa, Department of Finance, Oct 25, 1974. Canada. Minister of Finance. "Budget Speech of Feb 19, 1973." In: House of Commons Debates. Ottawa, Queen's Printer, pp.1428-1439. Canada. Minister of Finance. Summary of 1971 Tax Reform Legislation. (Ottawa, Department of Finance, June 1971. Canada. Revenue Canada. Taxation Statistics (Individuals).Annual. Ottawa, Information Canada. Canada. Statistics Canada. System of National Income andExpenditure Accounts. Quarterly. Ottawa, Information Canada. (Catalogue [number] 13-001.) Gorbet, Frederick William. Formula Flexibility and the Performance of the Canadian Economy: A Simulation Study Using the RDX2 Econometric Model. Ph.D. thesis. Duke University, 1972. Helliwell, J.F. "Macroeconomic Effects of Bill C-259." In: "Report of the Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Tax Conference Convened by the Canadian Tax Foundation." Toronto, Canadian Tax Foundation, pp 485-494. Helliwell, John F., R.G. Evans, F.W. Gorbet, Robert F.S. Jarrett and D.R. Stephenson. Government Sector Equations Ottawa, Bank of Canada, 1969. for Macroeconomic Models.(Bank of Canada Staff Research Studies No 4.) Helliwell, John and Tcm Maxwell. The Equations of RDX2 Ottawa, Bank of Cana Revised and Estimated to 4Q 1970. 1974. Helliwell, John F., and Harold T. Shapiro, Gordon R. Sparks,Ian A. Stewart, Frederick W. Gorbet and Donald R. Stephenson. The Structure of RDX2. Ottawa, Bank of Canada, 1971. 2 Parts, 267 (Bank of Canada Staff Research Studies No 7.) Kendall, Maurice G. and Alan Stuart. The Advanced Theory of Statistics. London, Griffin, 1963. 3 vol, vol 1, chapters 5 and 6. Metcalfe, C.E. An Econometric Model of the Income Distribution. Chicago, Markham, 1972. Pechman, Joesph A. "Responsiveness of the Federal Individual Income Tax to Changes in Income." Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 1933, p. 392. Quebec. Ministre des Finances. "Discours sur le Budget sur 28 Mars 1974." Dans: Assemblee Nationale Journal des Debats. Quebec, Assemblee Nationale, pp. 228-247, 259-281. Quebec. National Assembly of Quebec, Third Session, Twenty-Ninth Legislature. Bill 38: Taxation Act. Quebec, Quebec Official Publisher, 1972. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/31927 |