Dinda, Soumyananda (2011): Carbon emission and production technology: evidence from the US.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_31935.pdf Download (273kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Production technology is the main driving force of economic growth while upgraded technology reduces carbon emission. This paper investigates the long run relation with short run dynamics using the USA data for the period of 1963 -2007. This paper observes that production technology is the cause of reduction of CO2 emission only in short run. The impulse response of production technology suggests shortening the patent protection right that might encourage redesigning low carbon production processes to curve down carbon emission with raising income. Continuous change and adaption of production technology is the main driving force for sustainable development.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Commentary on: | Eprints 0 not found. |
Original Title: | Carbon emission and production technology: evidence from the US |
English Title: | Carbon emission and production technology: evidence from the US |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Production Technology, Innovation, Design Patent, Patent Right, Technological Progress, Co-integration, Causality, Carbon Emission, Income, CO2 Emission, Impulse Response, R&D |
Subjects: | O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O11 - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C32 - Time-Series Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes ; State Space Models O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O51 - U.S. ; Canada Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q53 - Air Pollution ; Water Pollution ; Noise ; Hazardous Waste ; Solid Waste ; Recycling O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O14 - Industrialization ; Manufacturing and Service Industries ; Choice of Technology |
Item ID: | 31935 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Soumyananda Dinda |
Date Deposited: | 15 Jul 2011 19:23 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 17:01 |
References: | Andreoni, J., and Levinson, A., 2001, “The simple analytics of the Environmental Kuznets curve”, Journal of Public Economics, v80, 269-286. Archibugi, D., and Coco. A., 2005, “Measuring technological capabilities at the country level: A Survey and a manu for choice”, Research Policy, v34, 175 – 194. Archibugi, D., and Coco,A., 2004, “A New Indicator of Technological Capabilities for Developed and Developing Countries (ArCo)”, World Development, v32(4), 629-654. Brunnermeier, S. B., and Cohen, M. A., 2003, “Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries”. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45: 278-293. Carrion-Flores, C. E., and R. Innes, 2010, “Environmental innovation and environmental performance”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, v59, 27-42. Engle, R.F., and Granger, C.W.J., 1987, “Cointegration and error correction: Representation, estimation and testing”. Econometrica, 55: 251-276. Griliches, Zvi., 1990, “Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey”, Journal of Economic Literature, v28 (4), 1661 -1707. Grossman, G.M., and Krueger, A. B., 1991, “Environmental impacts of the North American Free Trade Agreement”, NBER Working Paper 3914. Johansen, S., 1988, “Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, v12, 231-254. Komen, R., S. Gerking, and Folmer, H. 1997, “Income and environmental R&D: empirical evidence from OECD countries”, Environment and Development Economics, v2, 505–515. Kwiatkowski, D., P. C. B. Phillips, P. Schmidt, and Y. Shin, 1992, “Testing the Null Hypothesis of Stationarity Against the Alternative of a Unit Root”, Journal of Econometrics, v54, 159- 178. Lall, Sanjaya, 1992, “Technological capabilities and Industrialization”, World Development, v20(2), 165 – 186. Levinson, Arik., 2009, “Technology, International Trade, and Pollution from US Manufacturing”, American Economic Review, v99(5), 2177 -2192. Reis, A. B. 2001, “Endogenous Growth and the Possibility of Eliminating Pollution”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, v42, 360 - 373. Solow, R. M. 1956, “A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, v70(1), 65-94. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/31935 |