Sebri, Maamar (2009): La Zone Méditerranéenne Face à la Pollution de L’air : Une Investigation Econométrique.
Download (986kB) | Preview
The cleanup of the Mediterranean region constitutes one of the main chapters carried by the cooperation between both north and south banks within the framework of the Union for the Mediterranean (UfM). The subject of this paper is to study the relationship between CO2 emissions and economic growth in UfM countries. This relationship is described by the so called Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) model. The choice of model specification and the omission of additional variables appear among the controversies revealed around the EKC modelling. At first, this paper aims to select a model among three proposed. Secondly, it examines the effect of trade and population density on CO2 emissions. Three main results are attributed by this work. First, while CO2 emissions are still in increase in the case of MEDA countries, they have known a reduction phase in the case of UE countries. Second, the shape of the EKC as well as the turning point value depends on the functional form choice. Finally, the creation of a free trade area between both Mediterranean banks does not seem to affect the environment quality.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||La Zone Méditerranéenne Face à la Pollution de L’air : Une Investigation Econométrique|
|English Title:||The Mediterranean Zone in front of Air pollution: an Econometric Investigation|
|Keywords:||Union for the Mediterranean, CO2 emissions, Environmental Kuznets Curve, free trade, panel data, Nonnested Hypothesis Tests|
|Subjects:||C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C12 - Hypothesis Testing: General
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C23 - Panel Data Models ; Spatio-temporal Models
|Depositing User:||Maamar Sebri|
|Date Deposited:||01. Aug 2011 04:22|
|Last Modified:||02. Jan 2016 17:15|
Agras, J., Chapman, D., 1999. A dynamic approach to the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis. Ecological Economics 28, 267-277.
Akaike, H., 1974. A New Look at the Statistical Model Identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 19, 716-723.
Andreoni, J., Levinson, A., 2001. The simple analytics of the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Journal of Public Economics 80 (2), 269-286.
Antle, J.M, Heidebrink, G., 1995. Environment and Development: Theory and Internattional Evidence. Economic Development and Culturel Change 43, 603-625.
Aslanidis, N., Xepapadeas, A., 2008. Regime switching and the shape of the emission–income relationship. Economic Modelling. Article in Press
Auci, S., Becchetti, L., 2006. The instability of the adjusted and unadjusted Environmental Kuznets curves. Ecological Economics 60 (1), 282-298.
Azomahou, T., Laisney, F., Van Phu, N., 2006. Economic Development and CO2 emissions: a nonparametric panel approach. Journal of Public Economics 90, 1347-1363.
Bagliani, M., Bravo, G., Dalmazzone, S., 2008. A consumption-based approach to environmental Kuznets curves using the ecological footprint indicator. Ecological Economics, in Press.
Banque Mondiale 2008. Indicateurs du Développement mondial. Washington D.C.
Berrens, R., Bohara, A., Gawande, K., Wang, P., 1997. Testing the inverted U-hypothesis for U.S. hazardous waste: an application of the generalised Gamma model. Economic Letters 55, 435-440.
Box, G.E.P., Cox, D.R., 1964. An Analysis of Transformations. Journal of Royal Statistcal Society, Series B, 26, 211-252.
Brajer, V., Mead, R.W., 2007. Health Benefits of Tunneling through the Chinese environmental Kuznets curve (EKC). Ecological Economics, in Press.
CDIAC, 2008. http://cdiac.ornl.gov/
Cleveland, C.J., Costanza, R., Hall, C.A.S., Kaufmann, R., 1984. Energy and the US economy: a biophysical perspective, Science 255, 890-897.
Cole,M.A., 2004. Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental Kuznets curve: examining the linkages, Ecological Economics 48 (1), 71–81.
Copeland, B., Taylor, M.S., 2004. Trade, Growth an The Environment. Journal of Economic Literature 42 (1), 7-71.
Coondoo, D., Dinda, S., 2002. Causality between income and emission: a country group-specific econometric analysis. Ecological Economics 40 (3), 351-367.
Coondoo, D., Dinda, S., 2008. Carbon dioxyde emission and income: A temporal analysis of cross-country distributional patterns. Ecological Economics 65, 375-385.
Cropper, M., Griffiths, C., 1994. The interaction of populations, growth and environmental quality. American Economic Review 84, 250-254.
Culas, R.J., 2007. Deforestation and the environmental Kuznets curve: An institutional perspective. Ecological Economics 61, 429-437.
Davidson, R., MacKinnon J.G., 1983. Several tests for model specification in the presence of alternative hypotheses. Econometrica 49, 781- 793.
Dasgupta, S., Laplante, B., Wang, H., Wheeler, D., 2002. Confronting the environmental Kuznets curve. Journal of Economic Perspectives 16, 147-168.
Davidson, R., MacKinnon J.G., 1981. Several tests for model specification in the presence of alternative hypotheses. Econometrica 49, 781- 793.
Davidson, R., MacKinnon, J.G., 2004. Econometric Theory and Methods, Oxford University Press, New York.
Dijkgraf, E., Vollebergh, H.R.J., 2005. A Note on Testing for Environmental Kuznets Curve with panel data. Environmental and Resource Economics 32, 229-239.
Dinda, S., 2004. Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey. Ecological Economics 49, 431-455.
Dinda, S., Coondoo, D., 2006. Income and emission: a panel data based cointegration analysis. Ecological Economics 57 (2), 167-181.
de Bruyn, S.S., Van den Bergh, J.C.JM., Opschoor, J.B., 1998. Economic growth and emission: reconsidering the empirical basis of environmental Kuznets curves. Ecological Economic 25, 880-889.
Friedl, B., Getzner, M., 2003. Determinants of CO2 emissions in a small open economy. Ecological Economics 45, 133-148.
Galeotti, M., Lanza, A., 2005. Desperately seeking (Environmental) Kuznets. Fondazione. Environmental Modelling & Software 20, 1379-1388.
Galeotti, M., Lanza, A., Pauli, F., 2006. Reassessing the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: A robustness exercise. Ecological Economics 57, 152-163.
Georgescu-Roegen, N., 1971. The Entropy law and the Economic Process, Harvard University Press.
GIEC 2007. Climate Change 2007-Synthesis report, Fourth Assessment Report.
Godfrey, L.G., Wickens, M.R., 1981. Testing linear and loglinear regressions for functional form. The Review of Economic Studies 48, 487-496.
Grossman, G.M. and Krueger, A.B., 1993. Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. In: Garber, P. (Ed.), The U.S.-Mexico Free Trade Agreement. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 13-56.
Grossman, G.M. and Krueger, A.B., 1995. Economic growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110 (2), 253-377.
Halkos, G.E., Tsionas, E.G., 2001. Environmental Kuznets curves: Bayesian evidence from switching regime models. Energy Economics 23, 191-201.
Hamilton, C., Turton, H., 2002. Determinants of emissions growth in OECD countries. Energy Policy 30, 541-551.
Harbaugh, W., Levinson, A., Wilson, D.M., 2002. Re-examining the empirical evidence for an environmental Kuznets Curve. The Review of Economics and Statistics 84 (3), 541-551.
Hill, R.J., Magnani, E., 2002. An exploration of the conceptual and empirical basis of the environmental Kuznets curve. Australian Economic Papers 41, 239-254.
Holtz-Eakin, D., Selden, T.M., 1995. Stoking the fires? CO2 emissions and economic growth. Journal of Public Economics 57, 85-101.
Huang, B., Hwang, M.J., Yang, C.W., 2007. Causal Relationship between energy consumption and GDP growth revisited: A dynamic panel data approach. Ecological Economics, in Press.
Huang, W.M., Lee Grace, W.M., Wu, C.C., 2008. GHG emissions, GDP growth and the Kyoto Protocol: A revisit of Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis. Energy Policy 36, 239-247.
Kriström, B., Lundgren, T., 2005. Swedish CO2-emission 1900-2010: an exploratory note. Energy Policy 33, 1223-1230.
Kuznets, S., 1955. Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review49, 1-28.
Lantz, V., Feng, Q., 2006. Assessing income, population, and technology impacts on CO2 emissions in Canada: where’s the EKC? Ecological Economics 57, 229-238.
Lise, W., Monfort, K.V., 2007. Energy consumption and GDP in Turkey : Is there a co-integration relationship ? Energy Economics 29, 1166-1178.
MacKinnon, J.G., White, H., Davidson, R., 1983. Tests for Model Specification in the Presence of Alternative Hypotheses: Some Further Results. Journal of Econometrics 21, 53-70.
Magnani, E., Tubb, A. 2007. The Link Between Economic Growth and Environmental Quality: Does Population Ageing Matter? School of Economics Discussion Paper: 2007/12
Managi, S., 2004. Trade Liberalization and the Environment: Carbon Dioxide for 1960−1999. Economics Bulletin 17 (1), 1−5.
Managi, S., Jena, P.R., 2008. Environmental Productivity and Kuznets Curve in India. Ecological Economics 65, 432-440.
Martinez- Zarzoso, I., Bengochea-Morancho, A., Morales-Lage, R., 2006. The Impact of Population on CO2 Emissions: Evidence from European Countries. Fondazione ENI Enrico Mattei, Nota di lavaro N.98.
Meadows, D.H., Meadows D.L., Randers, J., Behrens, W., 1972. The Limits to Growth. Universe Books, New York. Neumayer, E., 2002. Can natural factors explain any cross-country differences in carbon dioxide emissions? Energy Policy 30, 7-12.
Nguyan Van, P., Azomahu, T., 2007. Non linearities and heterogeneity in Environmental Quality : An Empirical Analysis of Deforestation. Journal of Development Economics 84, 291-309.
Panayotou, T., 1993. Empirical Tests and Policy Analysis of Environmental Degradation at Different Stages of Economic Development. Working Paper WP238, Technology and Employment Programme, International Labour Office, Geneva.
Panayotou, T., 1995. Environmental Degradation at Different Stages of Economic Development. In Beyond Rio : The Environmental Crisis and Sustainable livelihoods in the Third World, ed. I. Ahmed and J.A. Doelman. ILO Studies Series. New York NY : St . Martin’s Press.
Richmond, A.K., Kaufmann, R.K., 2006. Is there a turning point in the relationship between income and enrgy use and/or carbon emission. Ecological Economics 56, 176-189.
Roca, J., Alcántara, V., 2001. Energy intensity, CO2 emissions and the environmental Kuznets curve. The Spanish case. Energy Policy 29, 553-556.
Roy, N., van Kooten, G.C., 2004. Another look at the income elasticity of non-point source air pollutants: a semiparametric approach. Economics Letters 85, 17-22.
Selden, T.M., Song, D., 1994. Environmental quality and development: Is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution? Journal of Environmental Economics and Environmental Management 27, 147 162.
Shafik, N., 1994. Economic development and environmental quality: an econometric analysis. Oxford Economic Papers 46, 757-73.
Shafik, N. and Bandyopadhyay, S., 1992. Economic Growth and Environmental Quality: Time Series and Cross Country Evidence. Background Paper for the World Development Report 1992, The World Bank, Washington DC.
Schwarz, G., 1978. Estimating the Dimension of a Model. Annals of Statistics 6, 461-464.
Soytas, U., Sari, R., Ewing, B.T., Energy consumption, income and carbon emissions in the United States. Ecological Economics 62, 482-489.
Stern, D.I., 2004. The Rise and fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve. World Development 32, 1419-1439.
Tucker, M., 1995. Carbon dioxide emission and global GDP. Ecological Economics 15, 215-223.
Vincent, J.R., 1997. Testing for environmental Kuznets curves within a developing country. Environment and Development Economics 2, 417-431.