Qian, Hang (2011): Sampling Variation, Monotone Instrumental Variables and the Bootstrap Bias Correction.

PDF
MPRA_paper_32634.pdf Download (404kB)  Preview 
Abstract
This paper discusses the finite sample bias of analogue bounds under the monotone instrumental variables assumption. By analyzing the bias function, we first propose a conservative estimator which is biased downwards (upwards) when the analogue estimator is biased upwards (downwards). Using the bias function, we then show the mechanism of the parametric bootstrap correction procedure, which can reduce but not eliminate the bias, and there is also a possibility of overcorrection.This motivates us to propose a simultaneous multilevel bootstrap procedure so as to further correct the remaining bias. The procedure is justified under the assumption that the bias function can be well approximated by a polynomial. Our multilevel bootstrap algorithm is feasible and does not suffer from the curse of dimensionality. Monte Carlo evidence supports the usefulness of this approach and we apply it to the disability misreporting problem studied by Kreider and Pepper(2007).
Item Type:  MPRA Paper 

Original Title:  Sampling Variation, Monotone Instrumental Variables and the Bootstrap Bias Correction 
English Title:  Sampling Variation, Monotone Instrumental Variables and the Bootstrap Bias Correction 
Language:  English 
Keywords:  Monotone instrumental variables; Bootstrap; Bias correction 
Subjects:  C  Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6  Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C63  Computational Techniques ; Simulation Modeling C  Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3  Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C31  CrossSectional Models ; Spatial Models ; Treatment Effect Models ; Quantile Regressions ; Social Interaction Models 
Item ID:  32634 
Depositing User:  Hang Qian 
Date Deposited:  07 Aug 2011 23:13 
Last Modified:  06 Aug 2016 00:34 
References:  Cain, M., 1994. The momentgenerating function of the minimum of bivariate normal random variables. The American Statistician 48, 124125. Chernozhukov, V., Lee, S. S., Rosen, A., 2009. Intersection bounds: estimation and inference. CeMMAP working papers CWP19/09. Clark, C. E., 1961. The greatest of a finite set of random variables. Operations Research 9, 145162. David, H. A., 1981. Order Statistics. Wiley. Davidson, R., MacKinnon, J., 2002. Fast double bootstrap tests of nonnested linear regression models. Econometric Reviews 21 (4), 419429. Davidson, R., MacKinnon, J. G., 2007. Improving the reliability of bootstrap tests with the fast double bootstrap. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 51 (7), 32593281. Kreider, B., Pepper, J. V., 2007. Disability and employment: Reevaluating the evidence in light of reporting errors. Journal of the American Statistical Association 102, 432441. Manski, C. F., Pepper, J. V., 2000. Monotone instrumental variables, with an application to the returns to schooling. Econometrica 68 (4), 9971012. Manski, C. F., Pepper, J. V., 2009. More on monotone instrumental variables. Econometrics Journal 12 (s1), 200216. Ross, A., 2010. Computing bounds on the expected maximum of correlated normal variables. Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability 12, 111138. 
URI:  https://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/id/eprint/32634 