Kundu, Amit (2010): Joint versus Individual Liability in Microfinance – A Comparative Impact Evaluation Through Natural Experiment. Published in: Asia -Pasific Social Science Review , Vol. 11, No. June, 2011 (10. August 2011): pp. 1-20.
Download (688kB) | Preview
In this paper we want to do a comparative impact evaluation among the participants of two separate types of microfinance system; a microfinance system operated through individual liability microcredit contract represented by VSSU and a microfinance system under SGSY scheme of the Government of India which is operated through joint liability microcredit contract through forming Self-Help Group among the rural people mainly married women. This impact evaluation is done through Natural experiment whose time span is two years. It was observed that in the base line period the participants of VSSU are comparatively in better economic position than the participants of SGSY scheme and non participants who are treated as control group in our experiment. It is established that increment of monthly income among the member households of VSSU is more than the member households under SGSY scheme but when we consider the outcome variable as increment of monthly per capita consumption expenditure we see the reverse picture. There is no significant difference on expenditure for human development purposes is observed among the participants of two different types of microfinance system and even at the end line period both the member households still consider expenditure for health and education is luxury. When we consider intra household decision making power through constructing Women’s Empowerment Index as an outcome variable then the change is maximum among the female SHG members under SGSY scheme. We have also estimated the optimum size of micro credit which is helpful for all types of rural participants to improve their economic conditions within a short span of time.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Joint versus Individual Liability in Microfinance – A Comparative Impact Evaluation Through Natural Experiment|
|English Title:||Joint versus Individual Liability in Microfinance – A Comparative Impact Evaluation Through Natural Experiment|
|Keywords:||Individual Liability, Joint Liability, Income, Consumption Expenditure, Human Capital Expenses, Women’s Empowerment|
|Subjects:||C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C4 - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics > C43 - Index Numbers and Aggregation
I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I31 - General Welfare, Well-Being
O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O16 - Financial Markets ; Saving and Capital Investment ; Corporate Finance and Governance
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C21 - Cross-Sectional Models ; Spatial Models ; Treatment Effect Models ; Quantile Regressions
G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services > G21 - Banks ; Depository Institutions ; Micro Finance Institutions ; Mortgages
|Depositing User:||AMIT KUNDU|
|Date Deposited:||09. Aug 2011 09:13|
|Last Modified:||02. Jan 2016 23:24|
Ahin. C. and R. Townsend (2007). ‘Using Repayment Data to Test Across Models of Joint Liability Lending’ Economic Journal February pp. F11-F51
Amin. S, A. S. Rai, and G. Topa (2003): “Does Micro Credit reach the poor and Vulnerable? Evidence from Northern Bangladesh”, Journal of Development Economics 70 (1), 59-82
Armendariz, de, Aghion .B. and J. Morduch (2005): ‘The Economics of Micro-Finance’, MIT Press
Besley Timothy, S.Coat and G.Loury (1993), ‘The Economics of Rotating Savings and Credit Association’, American Economic Review, 83(4), 792-810
Coleman Brett (1999). ‘The Impact of Group Lending in North-East Thailand’, Journal of Development Economics 60: 105-142
Coleman Brett (2002). ‘Microfinance in North-East Thailand: Who Benefits and How much?’ Economics and Research Department Working Paper no. 9, Asian Development Bank, April
Ghatak Maitreesh (1999), ‘Group Lending, Loan Information and Peer Selection’: Journal of Development Economics Vol-40 No-1
Gine X. and Karlan D. (2006): ‘Group versus Individual Liability – A Field Experiment in Philippines’, World Bank Policy Working Paper, 4008 Washington.
Goetz.A.M. and R. Sengupta (1996), ‘Who Takes the Credit? Gender, Power and Control over Loan Use in Rural Credit Programme in Bangladesh’: World Development 24, 1.
Hashemi, Syed M, Sidney Ruth Schuler, & Ann. P. Riley (1996), ‘Rural Credit Programme and Women’s Empowerment in Bangladesh’, World Development 24(4)
Himanshu (2007). ‘Recent Trends in Poverty and Inequality: Some Preliminary Results’, Economic and Political Weekly, February.
Holvoet. N. (2005): ‘The Impact of Microfinance on Decision Making Agency: Evidence from South India’, Development and Change 36(1) 75-102.
Hulme David and Paul Mosley (1996); ‘Finance against Poverty’; London, Routledge.
Kundu Amit (Dec.2008); ‘Impact of SGSY Scheme on Self-Help Group Members of West Bengal, India’, Afro-Asian Journal of Rural Development’ Vol.XXXXI, No.2, 83-104
Kundu Amit (Dec. 2010), ‘ Choice between Microfinance Systems Operating on the Basis of Individual Libility Loan Contract or Through Joint Liability Loan Contract’, The Asian Economic Review, No.3, pp.553-564.
Madajewicz Malgosia (2008), “Joint Liability versus Individual Liability in Credit Contract”, Forthcoming in Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization
Maria Lehner (Nov. 2008): ‘Group versus Individual Lending in Microfinance’, Discussion paper 2008-24, Department of Economics, University of Munich
Mitra Suranjana and Amit Kundu (2009) : ‘Determinants Influencing a Rural Household’s Preference to Join Individual Liability or Joint Libility Micro-credit Contract Operated by Primary Agricultural Credit Society’ , The Microfinance Review, Vol.1(1), July-December, pp. 14-31
Montgomery. R. (1996): ‘Disciplining or Protecting the Poor? Avoiding the Social Costs of Peer Pressure in Micro Finance Scheme’, Journal of International Development 8(2), 289-306.
Pitt. Mark, Shahidur. R. Khandekar and Cartwright Jennifer (2006). ‘Empowering Women with Microfinance: Evidence from Bangladesh’ Economic Development and Cultural Change 791-831.
Puhazhendi.V. & K.C. Badatya (2002), ‘Self-Help Group Bank Linkage Programme for Rural Poor in India-An Impact Assessment’; Bombay NABARD
Rahman Aminur (2001). ‘Women and Microcredit in Rural Bangladesh: An Anthropological Study of Grameen Bank Lending’, Boulder, CO, Westview Press
Zeller M (1998), ‘Determinant of Repayment Performance in Credit Groups: The Role of Programme Design, Intra group Risk Pooling and Social Cohesion’; Economic Development and Cultural Change, 46(3), 599-620.