Liu, Chun (2010): Marginal likelihood calculation for gelfand-dey and Chib Method.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_34928.pdf Download (128kB) | Preview |
Abstract
One advantage of Bayesian estimation is its solid theoretical ground on model comparison, which relies heavily upon the accurate calculation of marginal likelihood. The Gelfand-Dey (1994) and Chib (1995) methods are two popular means of calculating marginal likelihood. A trade-off exists between these two methods. The Gelfand-Dey method is simpler and faster to conduct, while Chib method is more accurate, yet intricate. In this paper, we compare the two methods by their ability to identify structural breaks in a reduced form volatility model. Using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo method, we demonstrate that the performance of the two methods is fairly close. Since the Chib method is normally more di±cult to implement in many econometric problems, it is safe to choose Gelfand-Dey method when calculating marginal likelihood.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Marginal likelihood calculation for gelfand-dey and Chib Method |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Model Comparison; Structural Break; Heterogeneous Autoregressive Model; Bayesain Estimation |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C52 - Model Evaluation, Validation, and Selection C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C11 - Bayesian Analysis: General |
Item ID: | 34928 |
Depositing User: | Chun Liu |
Date Deposited: | 22 Nov 2011 00:34 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 22:30 |
References: | Andersen, T. G., T. Bollerslev and F. X. Diebold, 2007. Roughing It Up: Including Jump Components in the Measurement, Modeling and Forecasting of Return Volatil- ity. Review of Economics and Statistics, 89, 701-720. Chib, S., 1995. Marginal likelihood from the Gibbs output. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90(432), 1313-1321. Chib, S., 1998. Estimation and comparison of multiple change point models. Journal of Econometrics, 86, 221-241. Corsi, F., 2009. A simple long memory model of realized volatility. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 7(2), 174-196. Gelfand, A. E. and Dey, D. K., 1994. Bayesian model choice: asymptotics and exact calculations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B 56, 501-514. Geweke J., 1999. Using Simulation Methods for Bayesian Econometric Models: Inference, Development, and communication. Econometric Reviews, 18, 1-126. Kass, R. E. and A. E. Raftery, 1995. Bayes factors and model uncertainty. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 773-795. Liu, C. and J. M. Maheu, 2008. Are there Structural Breaks in Realized Volatility? Journal of Financial Econometrics, 6(3), 326-360, Summer, 2008. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/34928 |