Aiello, Francesco and Cardamone, Paola (2011): Regional economic divide and the role of technological spillovers in Italy. Evidence from microdata.
This is the latest version of this item.
Download (290kB) | Preview
This paper assesses the impact of Research and Development (R&D) efforts on production in the North and Centre-South of Italy by using a panel of 1,203 manufacturing firms over the period 1998-2003. The estimations are based on a nonlinear translog production function augmented by a measure of R&D spillovers. This measure combines the geographical distance between firms, the technological similarity within each pair of firms and the technical efficiency of each firm. The estimation method takes into account the endogeneity of regressors and the potential sample selection issue regarding firms’ decisions to invest in R&D. The two main results are as follows. Internal and external R&D have a lower impact in the Centre-South of Italy than in the rest of the country and they are weak substitutes whatever the area.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Regional economic divide and the role of technological spillovers in Italy. Evidence from microdata|
|Keywords:||R&D spillovers, Italian economic divide, translog production function, technical efficiency|
|Subjects:||C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C23 - Panel Data Models ; Spatio-temporal Models
O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes
L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L29 - Other
|Depositing User:||Aiello Francesco|
|Date Deposited:||06. Dec 2011 14:06|
|Last Modified:||20. Feb 2013 00:17|
Adams, J.D., Jaffe, A.B., 1996. Bounding the effect of R&D: an investigation using matched establishment-firm data. RAND J. Econ. 27, 700-721.
Aiello, F., Cardamone, P., 2005. R&D spillovers and productivity growth. Further evidence from Italian manufacturing micro-data. Appl. Econ. Letters. 12, 625-631.
Aiello, F., Cardamone, P., 2008. R&D Spillovers and Firms’ Performance in Italy. Evidence from a Flexible Production Function. Empirical Econ. 34, 143-166.
Aiello, F., Scoppa, V., 2000. Uneven Regional Development in Italy: Explaining Differences in Productivity Levels. Giornale Econ. 60, 270-98.
Aldieri, L., Cincera, M., 2009. Geographic and technological R&D spillovers within the triad: Micro evidence from US patents. J. Tech. Transfer. 34, 196-211.
Antonioli, B., Fazioli, R., Filippini M., 2000. Il servizio di igiene urbana italiano tra concorrenza e monopolio. in: Cambini, C., Bulckaen, F. (Eds.), I servizi di pubblica utilità. Concorrenza e regolazione nei nuovi mercati, Franco Angeli, Milan.
Arrow, K.J., 1962. The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing. Rev. Econ. Stud. 29, 155-173.
Audretsch, D.B., Feldmann, M.P., 2004. Knowledge Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics. 4, 2713-2739.
Bank of Italy (2009), Mezzogiorno e Politiche regionali, Workshops and Conferences n. 2. Bank of Italy, Rome.
Becker, B., Pain, N., 2003. What determines Industrial R&D Expenditure in the UK? National Institute of Economic and Social Research Discussion Paper n. 211.
Berndt, E.R., Christensen, L.R., 1973. The Translog Function and the Substitution of equipment, structures, and labor in U.S. manufacturing 1929-68. J. Econometrics. 1, 81-114.
Bhattacharya, M., Bloch, H., 2004. Determinants of Innovation. Small Bus. Econ. 22, 155-162.
Botazzi, L., Peri, G., 2003. Innovation and spillovers in regions: Evidence from European patent data. Europ. Econ. Rev. 47, 687-710.
Camagni, R., 2007. Towards a Concept of Territorial Competitiveness: Sound or Misleading” Paper presented at the 42nd ERSA Conference, Paris, August-September.
Cardamone P. (2011). A Micro-Econometric Analysis of the Role of R&D Spillovers using a Nonlinear Translog Specification – J. Prod. Anal., (forthcoming); DOI: 10.1007/s11123-011-0225-3.
Carmeci, G., Mauro, L., 2002. The Convergence of the Italian Regions and Unemployment. Theory and Evidence. J. Reg. Sci. 42, 509-532.
Chan, M.W.L, Mountain, D.C., 1983. Economies of scale, and the Tornqvist discrete measure of productivity. Rev. Econ. Statist. 65, 663-667.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Rhodes, E., 1978. Measuring Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research. 2, 429-444.
Christensen, L.R., Jorgenson, D.W., Lau, L.J., 1973. Trascendental logarithmic production frontiers. Rev. Econ. Statist. 55, 28-45.
Ciccone, A., 2004. Human capital as a Factor of Growth and Employment at the Regional Level: The Case of Italy. Unpublished.
Cincera, M., 2005. Firms’ productivity growth and R&D Spillovers: an analysis of alternative technological proximity measures. CEPR Discussion paper n. 4984.
Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D.A., 1989. Innovation and Learning: The two Faces of R&D. The Econ. J. 99, 569-596.
Cohen, W.M., Levinthal D.A., 1990. Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly. 5, 128-152.
Crescenzi, R. 2005, Innovation and Regional Growth in the Enlarged Europe: The Role of Local Innovative Capabilities, Peripherality and Education, Growth and Change, 36, 3, 471-507.
Del Monte, A., Papagni, E., 2003. R&D and the growth of firms: empirical analysis of a panel of Italian firms. Res. Pol. 32, 1003-1014.
Di Giacinto, V., Nuzzo, G., 2006. Explaining labour productivity differentials across Italian regions: the role of socio-economic structure and factor endowments. Pap. Reg. Sci. 85, 299 – 320.
Di Liberto, A., Pigliaru, F., Mura, R., 2008. How to Measure the Unobservable. A Panel Technique for the analysis of TFP Convergence. Oxford Econ. Pap. 60, 343-368.
Evangelista, R., Iammarino, S., Mastrostefano, V., Silvani, A., 2002. Looking for Regional System of Innovation: Evidence from the Italian Innovation Survey. Reg. Stud. 36, 173-186.
Feser, E.J., 2004. A Flexible Test for Agglomeration Economies in two U.S. Manufacturing Industries. CES Working Paper n. 14, U.S. Census Bureau.
Goel, D., 2002. Impact of Infrastructure on Productivity: Case of Indian Registered Manufacturing. CDP Working Paper n. 106, Delhi School of Economics.
Griliches, Z., 1979. Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth. Bell J. Econ. 10, 92-116.
Griliches, Z., 1991. The Search for R&D Spillovers. Scand. J. Econ. 94, 29-47.
Gustavsson, P., Poldhal, A., 2003. Determinants of firms R&D: Evidence from Swedish firm level data. FIEF Working Paper Series 2003 n. 190.
Hall, B.H., Mairesse, J., 1995. Exploring the Relationship between R&S and Productivity in French Manufacturing Firms. J. Econometrics. 65, 265-293.
Harhoff, D., 1998. R&D and Productivity in German Manufacturing Firms. Econ. Innovation New Tech. 6, 29-49.
Harhoff, D., 2000. R&D Spillovers, technological Proximity, and productivity Growth – Evidence from German Panel Data. Schmalenbach Business Review. 52, 238-260.
Iammarino, S., 2005, An Evolutionary Integrated View of Regional Systems of Innovation: Concepts, Measures and Historical Perspectives, European Planning Studies, 13, 4, 497-519.
Inkmann, J., Pohlmeier, W., 1995. R&D Spillovers, Technological Distance, and Innovative Success. Unpublished, University of Kostanz, 1995.
Jaffe, A.B., 1986. Technology Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms patents, profits and market value. Amer. Econ. Rev. 76, 984-1001.
Jaffe, A.B., 1988. Demand and Supply Influences in R&D Intensity and Productivity Growth. The Rev. Econ. Statist. 70, 431-437.
Kaiser, U., 2002. Measuring knowledge spillovers in manufacturing and services: an empirical assessment of alternative approaches. Res. Pol. 31, 125-144.
Kim. H.Y., 1992. The Translog Production Function and Variables Returns to Scale. Rev. Econ. Statist. 74, 546-552.
Koo, J., 2005. Technology Spillovers, Agglomeration, and Regional Economic Development. Journal of Planning Literature. 20, 99-115.
Lall, S., Shalizi, Z., Deichmann, U., 2001. Agglomeration Economies and Productivity in Indian Industry. Policy Research Working Paper n. 2663, The World Bank Development Research Group.
Leo, H., 2003. Determinants of Innovative Activities at the Firm Level. Paper presented to the International Workshop “Empirical Studies on Innovation in Europe”, 1-2 December 2003, Faculty of Economics - University of Urbino, Italy.
Los, B., Verspagen, B., 2000. R&D Spillovers and Productivity: Evidence from U.S. Manufacturing Microdata. Empirical Econ. 25, 127-48.
Lundvall, B., 2002. Innovation, Growth and Social Cohesion. The Danish Model. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Maffezzoli, M., 2006. Convergence Across Italian Regions and the Role of Technological Catch-Up. B.E. Journal in Macroeconomics, Topics, 6, 1, Article 15.
Mairesse, J., Hall, B.H., 1996. Estimating the Productivity of Research and Development: An Exploration of GMM Method Using Data on French an USA Manufacturing Firms. NBER Working Paper n. 5501.
May, J.D., Denny, M., 1979. Factor Augmenting Technical Progress and Productivity in U.S. Manufacturing. Int. Econ. Rev. 20, 759-774.
Orlando, M., 2000. On the importance of geographic and technological proximity for R&D spillovers: An empirical investigation. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, RWP 00-02.
Osservatorio Enea, 2006. L’Italia nella competizione tecnologica internazionale. Quinto rapporto. Sintesi e scenari generali - Osservatorio sull’Italia nella Competizione Tecnologica Internazione. 5th report, June 2006.
Paci, R., Saba, F., 1998. The empirics of regional economic growth in Italy 1951-1993. Rivista Int. Sci. Econ. Com. 45 , 515-542.
Parisi, M.L., Schiantarelli, F., Sembenelli, A., 2006. Productivity, innovation and R&D: Micro evidence for Italy. Europ. Econ. Rev. 50, 2037-2061.
Pavitt, K., 1984. Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Res. Pol. 13, 343–373.
Putnam, R.D., 1993, Making Democracy Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Poti, B., 2001. Differences in the propensity to innovate between less and more developed regions: how a system of innovation approach can explain them. In Innovative Networks. Co-operation in National Innovations Systems, OECD, Paris.
Rodrìguez-Pose, A., 2001, Is R&D Investment in Lagging Areas of Europe Worthwhile? Theory and Empirical Evidence, Papers in Regional Science, 80, 3, 275-295.
Romer, P.M., 1986. Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth. J. Polit. Economy. 94, 1002-1037.
Saal. D., 2001. A Constrained Translog Model of the Impact of Industrially and Federally Funded R&D on U.S. Manufacturing Growth. RP0115, Aston Business School, Birmingham.
Trajtenberg, M. 1990, Economic Analysis of Product Innovation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Verspagen., B., 1995. R&D and Productivity: a Broad Cross-Section Cross-Country Look. J. Productiv. Anal. 6, 117-135.
Wakelin, K., 2001. Productivity Growth and R&S Expenditure in UK Manufacturing Firms. Res. Pol. 20, 1079-90.
Wooldridge, J.M., 2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. MIT: Cambridge, MA.
Available Versions of this Item
Regional economic divide and the role of technological spillovers in Italy. Evidence from microdata. (deposited 09. May 2010 01:43)
- Regional economic divide and the role of technological spillovers in Italy. Evidence from microdata. (deposited 06. Dec 2011 14:06) [Currently Displayed]