Costos de transacción en biotecnología

Estrada, Fernando and Diaz, Natalia (2011): Costos de transacción en biotecnología.

Abstract

This paper aims to relate the principles of Ronald Coase Theorem with negative impacts of biotechnology, taking cases of specific research groups and medium-sized companies in biotechnology. We consider an application of economic theory on transaction costs (TEC) provides a good foundation for understanding the underlying problems of this sector, even more, when analyzing the political economy of biotechnology since the transaction costs can best viewed their limitations and the limited scope of government policy. In biotechnology it is possible to get a policy that combines both equity and efficiency, that is, a wider range of policy applications to improve the living standards of people in Colombia.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: Transaction costs in biotechnology
• Language: Spanish
• Keywords: Coase Theorem, Transaction costs, Biotechnology, Public Choice, Colombia
• Subjects: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B2 - History of Economic Thought since 1925 > B21 - Microeconomics; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O13 - Agriculture ; Natural Resources ; Energy ; Environment ; Other Primary Products; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D82 - Asymmetric and Private Information ; Mechanism Design; N - Economic History > N5 - Agriculture, Natural Resources, Environment, and Extractive Industries > N56 - Latin America ; Caribbean; D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D03 - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B2 - History of Economic Thought since 1925; D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D42 - Monopoly; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B41 - Economic Methodology

References

Alfranca, O., Huffman, W.E., 2001, “Impact of institutions and public research on private agriculture research”. Agricultural Economics 25, 191–198.

Argyres, N., and Silverman, B., R&D, Organization Structure, and the Development of Corporate technological knowledge, Strategie Management Journal Strat. Mgmt. 7., 25: 929-958 (2004) Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com).

Arrow, K. J., Cropper, M. L., Eads, G. C., Hahn, R. W., Lave, L. B., Noll, R. G., Portney, P. R., Russell, M., Schmalensee, R., Smith, V. K., and Stavins, R. N. (1996), ‘Is There a Role for Benefit–Cost Analysis in Environmental, Health, and Safety Regulation?’, Science, 272(5259), 221.

BiotecVisions 2011, February A1–A8; 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Byerlee, D., Alex, G., Echeverría, R.G., 2002, “The evolution of public research systems in developing countries: facing new challenges”. In: Byerlee, D., Echeverría, R.G. (Eds.),Agricultural Research Policy in an Era of Privatization (Chapter 1). CABI, Oxon, UK, pp. 19–34.

Byerlee, D., Fischer, K., 2002, “Accessing modern science: policy and institutional options for agricultural biotechnology in developing countries”. World Development 30 (6), 931–948.

Calabresi, Guido (1968), ‘Transaction Costs, Resource Allocation and Liability Rules: A Comment’, Journal of Law and Economics, 67-73.

Campbell, Alison F. 2005, “The evolving of the concept of value add in university commercialization”, Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 11, 4, pg. 337 – 345.

Cano (2003), “Los diez cimientos de las negociaciones internacionales de comercio en la agricultura”, Intervención del señor ministro de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural en el foro de Portafolio “Oportunidades y amenazas del ALCA y el TLC” Bogotá, septiembre 04.

Cantley, Mark, (2004), “How should public policy respond to the challenges of modern biotechnology?” Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 15:258–263.

Coase, R. H. 1935. The problem of duopoly reconsidered, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 2, 137.

Coase, R. H. 1937A. “The nature of the firm”, p. 33 in Williamson, O. E. and Winter, S. G. (eds) 1991, The Nature of the Firm, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Coase, R. H. 1937B. “Some notes on monopoly price”, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 5, 17.

Coase, R. H. 1939. “Rowland Hill and the penny post”, Economica, vol. 6, 423

Coase, R. H. 1945. “Price and output policy of state enterprise: a comment”, Economic Journal, vol. 55, 112

Coase, R. H. 1946A. “BBC Enquiry?”, The Spectator, no. 176.

Coase, R. H. 1946B, “The marginal cost controversy”, p. 75 in Coase, R. H. 1988, The Firm, the Market and the Law, Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press.

Coase, R. H. 1960, “The problem of social cost”, p. 95 in Coase, R. H. 1988, The Firm, the Market and the Law, Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press.

Coase (1994), La empresa, el mercado y la ley, El problema del coste social, Tha Nobel Foundation (1991), Alianza Editorial S.A., Madrid, (España).