Chaudhuri, Sarbajit (2012): Endogenous labour market imperfection and the HOS model: some counterintuitive trade-theoretic results.
Download (126kB) | Preview
This paper introduces endogenous labour market imperfection in an otherwise Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson (HOS) model. It demonstrates that this framework satisfies the Stolper-Samuelson theorem and the magnification effect and that it is capable of producing certain trade-theoretic results which are contrary to the standard HOS and the Corden and Findlay (1975) results.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Endogenous labour market imperfection and the HOS model: some counterintuitive trade-theoretic results|
|English Title:||Endogenous Labour Market Imperfection and the HOS Model: Some Counterintuitive Trade-theoretic Results|
|Keywords:||Labour market imperfection, Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson model, Corden and Findlay model, foreign capital, trade liberalization, general equilibrium|
|Subjects:||F - International Economics > F2 - International Factor Movements and International Business > F20 - General
O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O17 - Formal and Informal Sectors ; Shadow Economy ; Institutional Arrangements
F - International Economics > F2 - International Factor Movements and International Business > F21 - International Investment ; Long-Term Capital Movements
|Depositing User:||Sarbajit Chaudhuri|
|Date Deposited:||20. Jan 2012 03:27|
|Last Modified:||04. Jan 2016 12:21|
Batra, R.N. (1973): Studies in the Pure Theory of International Trade, Macmillan.
Brecher, R.A. and C.F. Diaz Alejandro (1977): ‘Tariffs, foreign capital and immiserizing growth’, Journal of International Economics 7, 317-22.
Calvo, G. (1978): ‘Urban unemployment and wage determination in LDCs: trade unions in the Harris-Todaro model’, International Economic Review 19(1), 65-81.
Chaudhuri, S. (2005): Labour market distortion, technology transfer and gainful effects of foreign capital’, The Manchester School 73(2), 214-227.
Chaudhuri, S. and Mukhopadhyay, U. (2009): Revisiting the Informal Sector: A General Equilibrium Approach, Springer. New York.
Corden, W. M. and Findlay, R. (1975): ‘Urban unemployment, intersectoral capital mobility, and development policy in a dual economy’, Economica 42, 59-78.
Eaton, J. and Panagariya, A. (1979): ‘Gains from trade under variable returns to scale, commodity taxation, tariffs and factor market distortions’, Journal of International Economics 9, 481–501.
Eaton, J. and Panagariya, A. (1982): ‘Growth and welfare in a small, open economy’, Economica 49, 409–419.
Harris, J. R. and Todaro, M. (1970): ‘Migration, unemployment, and development: a two-sector analysis’, American Economic Review 60, 126-142.
Kemp, M.C. and Negishi, T. (1970): ‘Variable returns to scale, commodity taxes, factor market distortions and their implications for trade gains’,. Swedish Journal of Economics 72, 1–11.
Khan, M. A. (1982): ‘Tariffs, foreign capital and immiserizing growth with urban unemployment and specific factors of production’, Journal of Development Economics 10, 245-56.
Marjit, S. and Beladi, H. (2003).’Possibility or impossibility of paradoxes in the small country Harris-Todaro framework: a unifying analysis’,Journal of Development Economicsvol. 72(1), 379-385.
Ohyama, M. (1972): ‘Trade and welfare in general equilibrium’, Keio Economic Studies, 9, 37–73.
Pravin K. and Panagariya, A. (2000): ‘A uniﬁcation of second best results in international trade’, Journal of International Economics 52, 235–257.