Forges, Françoise and Iehlé, Vincent (2012): Essential Data, Budget Sets and Rationalization.
Download (182kB) | Preview
According to a minimalist version of Afriat’s theorem, a consumer behaves as a utility maximizer if and only if a feasibility matrix associated with his choices is cyclically consistent. An ”essential experiment” consists of observed consumption bundles (x1,xn) and a feasibility matrix α. Starting with a standard experiment, in which the economist has speciﬁc budget sets in mind, we show that the necessary and suﬃcient condition for the existence of a utility function rationalizing the experiment, namely, the cyclical consistency of the associated feasibility matrix, is equivalent to the existence, for any budget sets compatible with the deduced essential experiment, of a utility function rationalizing them (and typically depending on them). In other words, the conclusion of the standard rationalizability test, in which the economist takes budget sets for granted, does not depend on the full speciﬁcation of the underlying budget sets but only on the essential data that these budget sets generate. Starting with an essential experiment (x1,...,xn;α), we show that the cyclical consistency of α, together with a further consistency condition involving both (x1,...,xn) and α, guarantees that the essential experiment is rationalizable almost robustly, in the sense that there exists a single utility function which rationalizes at once almost all budget sets which are compatible with (x1,...,xn;α). The conditions are also trivially necessary.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Essential Data, Budget Sets and Rationalization|
|Keywords:||Afriat’s theorem, budget sets, cyclical consistency, rational choice, revealed preference|
|Subjects:||D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D11 - Consumer Economics: Theory
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C8 - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology ; Computer Programs > C81 - Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Microeconomic Data ; Data Access
|Depositing User:||Vincent Iehlé|
|Date Deposited:||08. Feb 2012 16:16|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 04:07|
Afriat, S. (1967). The construction of a utility function from demand data. International Economic Review, 8, 67–77.
Chung-Piaw, T. and Vohra, R. (2003). Afriat’s theorem and negative cycles. mimeo, Northwestern University.
Ekeland, I. and Galichon, A. (2010). Pareto indivisible allocations, revealed preference and duality. mimeo, Ecole Polytechnique, Paris.
Forges, F. and Minelli, E. (2009). Afriat’s theorem for general budget sets. Journal of Economic Theory, 144(1), 135–145.
Fostel, A., Scarf, H., and Todd, M. (2004). Two new proofs of Afriat’s theorem. Economic Theory, 24(1), 211–219.
Matzkin, R. L. (1991). Axioms of revealed preference for nonlinear choice sets. Econometrica, 59(6), 1779–86.
Shapley, L. and Scarf, H. (1974). On cores and indivisibility. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 1, 23–37.
Varian, H. R. (1982). The nonparametric approach to demand analysis. Econometrica, 50(4), 945–73.
Yatchew, A. J. (1985). A note on non-parametric tests of consumer behaviour. Economics Letters, 18(1), 45–48.