Postolachi, Andrei-Teofil (2012): Regionalizarea comertului international.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_36936.pdf Download (350kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The economic integration process is a current widely spared process in the world economy. The necessity of collaboration between countries on economic, politic and social plans is being implemented by nations through a raising number of commercial agreements for example during the last decades. The commercial dimension represents interest because of the high importance it has in the interaction process. This paper is structured in two main parts, on first side are outlined the main features of the economic integration process, linked to main stages or its global scale; and secondly we analyzed the impact of this process on trade. The two main influences are linked especially to “trade creation” and “trade diversion” effects, which can occur after the signature of a trade agreement. These changes show the key aspects of trade regionalization, which means the changes in commercial partners, quantity or quality of traded products, modifications in production process and so on.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Regionalizarea comertului international |
English Title: | Regionalization of international trade |
Language: | Romanian |
Keywords: | integrare economica, regionalizare, comert international |
Subjects: | F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F15 - Economic Integration F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F10 - General J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J5 - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining > J51 - Trade Unions: Objectives, Structure, and Effects |
Item ID: | 36936 |
Depositing User: | Andrei Postolachi |
Date Deposited: | 26 Feb 2012 20:18 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 10:03 |
References: | [1] Bhagwati, J. (1993) Regionalism and multilateralism: an overview, in De Melo, J., Panagariya, A. (ed) New dimensions in regional integration, Cambridge University Press [2] Kono, D., Y. (2007) When do Trade Blocs Block Trade?, International Studies Quarterly, Nr.51, pp. 165-181. [3] Krugman, P., (1991a) The Move Toward Free Trade Zones, in (November/December 1991) Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, pp. 5-27, [4] Krugman, P. (1991b) Is Bilateralism Bad?, in Helpman, E., Razin, A., (1991) International Trade and Policy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology , pp. 9-24. [5] Langenhove, L.V. (2004) Regional integration and the individualism/collectivism dichotomy, Asia Europe Journal, Volume 2, Number 1, pp. 95-107 [6] Lee, Jong-Wha, Shin Kwanho (2006) Does regionalism lead to more global trade integration in East Asia?, North American Journal of Economics and Finance 17, pp. 283–301, [7] Miron, D. (2003) Comerț internațional, Editura ASE, București, [8] Park, I., Park, S. (2011) Best practices for regional trade agreements, Review of World Economics, Nr.147, pp. 249-268, [9] Perroux, Fr. (1968) L′integration et l′echec de la theorie traditionelles des echanges extereurs, Economie appliquee, vol. 21, nr. 2, [10] Song, W. (2006) Regionalisation, inter-regional cooperation and global governance, Open Economies Review, Volume 17, Number 3, pp. 297-319, [11] Suranovici, M., S. (2004) Trade Diversion and Trade Creation, Universitatea din Zurich, [12] Viner, J. (1950) The Customs Union Issue, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, New York, [13] Yoshimatsu, H. (2008) The Political Economy of Regionalism in East Asia: Integrative Explanation for Dynamics and Challenges, Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 213-225. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/36936 |