Halkos, George and Tzeremes, Nickolaos (2012): Ranking policy and political economic journals.
Download (563kB) | Preview
The purpose of this paper is to rank economic journals in the broader field of policy and political science. By using one composite input and one composite output the paper ranks 52 journals in a linear programming setting using data for the time period of 1996-2010. In addition for the first time three different quality ranking reports have been incorporated into a Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) modelling problem in order to classify these journals into four categories (‘A’ to ‘D’). The rankings suggest that the journals with the highest rankings are American Political Science Review, Research Policy, The China Quarterly, Public Choice and Journal of Conflict Resolution.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Ranking policy and political economic journals|
|Keywords:||Ranking; Economic journals; Policy; Political science|
|Subjects:||F - International Economics > F5 - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy > F50 - General
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C0 - General > C02 - Mathematical Methods
D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D78 - Positive Analysis of Policy Formulation and Implementation
A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A10 - General
E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E61 - Policy Objectives ; Policy Designs and Consistency ; Policy Coordination
|Depositing User:||Nickolaos Tzeremes|
|Date Deposited:||27. Feb 2012 09:49|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 15:49|
Burton, M.P. and E. Phimister. (1995). “Core journals: A reappraisal of the Diamond list.” Economic Journal 105(429): 361-373.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. and E.L. Rhodes. (1978). “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units.” European Journal of Operational Research 2(6): 429-444.
Corsi, M., D’Ippoliti, C. and F. Lucidi (2010). “Pluralism at Risk? Heterodox Economic Approaches and the Evaluation of Economic Research in Italy.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 69(5): 1495-1529.
Cronin, B. (2008). “Journal Citation Among Heterodox Economists 1995–2007: Dynamics of Community Emergence.” On the Horizon 16: 226– 240.
Daraio, C. and L. Simar. (2007). Advanced robust and nonparametric methods in efficiency analysis. Springer: New York.
Diamond, A.M. (1989). “The core journals of economics.” Current Contents 21(1): 4–11.
Earl, P. E. (2008). “Heterodox Economics and the Future of Academic Publishing.” On the Horizon 16: 205–213.
Farrell, M. (1957). “The measurement of productive efficiency.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A 120(3): 253–281.
Førsund, F.R. and N. Sarafoglou. (2002). “On the origins of Data Envelopment Analysis.” Journal of the Productivity Analysis 17(1-2): 23-40.
Halkos, G.E. and N.G. Tzeremes. (2011). “Measuring Economic Journals' Citation Efficiency: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach.” Scientometrics 88(3): 979-1001.
Harvey, C., Kelly, A., Morris, H. and M. Rowlinson. (2010). “Academic Journal Quality Guide.” The Association of Business Schools, Version 4. Available from: http://www.associationofbusinessschools.org/sites/default/files/Combined%20Journal%20Guide.pdf.
Kalaitzidakis, P., Mamuneas, T.P. and T. Stengos. (2003). “Rankings of academic journals and institutions in economics.” Journal of the European Economic Association 1(6): 1346-1366.
Kalaitzidakis, P., Mamuneas, T.P. and T. Stengos. (2010). “An updated ranking of academic journals in economics.” The Rimini Centre for Economic Analysis, WP 10-15. Available at: http://www.rcfea.org/RePEc/pdf/wp15_10.pdf.
Kalaitzidakis, P., Mamuneas, T.P. and T. Stengos. (2011). “An updated ranking of academic journals in economics.” Canadian Journal of Economics 44(4): 1525-1538.
Kapeller, J. (2010), “Citation Metrics: Serious Drawbacks, Perverse Incentives, and Strategic Options for Heterodox Economics.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 69(5): 1376-1408.
Kodrzycki, Y. K., and P. Yu. (2006). “New Approaches to Ranking Economics Journals.” Contributions to Economic Analysis and Policy 5(1): article 24. Available at: http://www.bepress.com/bejeap/contributions/vol5/iss1/, art24.
Laband, D. and M. Piette. (1994). “The relative impact of economic journals.” Journal of Economic Literature 32(1): 640–66.
Lee, F. S. (2007). “The Research Assessment Exercise, the State and the Dominance of Mainstream Economics in British Universities.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 31: 309–325.
Lee, F. S., and S. Harley. (1998). “Peer Review, the Research Assessment Exercise and the Demise of Non-Mainstream Economics.” Capital and Class 66: 23–51.
Lee, F. S., and W. Elsner. (2008). “Publishing, Ranking, and the Future of Heterodox Economics.” On the Horizon 16(4): 176–184.
Lee, F.S., Cronin, B.C., McConnell, S. and E. Dean (2010). “Research Quality Rankings of Heterodox Economic Journals in a Contested Discipline.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 69(5): 1409-1452.
Liebowitz, S.J. and J.C. Palmer. (1984). “Assessing the relative impacts of economics journals.” Journal of Economic Literature 22(1): 77–88.
Pujol, F. (2008). “Ranking journals following a matching model approach: An application to public economic journals.” Journal of Public Economic Theory 10(1): 55–76.
Ritzberger, K. (2008). “A ranking of journals in economics and related fields.” German Economic Review 9(4): 402-430.
Shephard, R.W. (1970). Theory of cost and production function. Princeton University Press: Princecton, NJ.
Starr, M.A. (2010). “Increasing the Impact of Heterodox Work: Insights from RoSE.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 69(5): 1453-1474.