Melecky, Martin and Podpiera, Anca Maria (2012): Institutional structures of financial sector supervision, their drivers and emerging benchmark models.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_37059.pdf Download (690kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper studies the development of institutional structures for prudential and business conduct supervision of financial services over the past decade for 98 high and middle income countries. It identifies possible drivers of changes in these supervisory structures using a panel ordered probit analysis. The results show that (i) countries advancing to a higher stage of economic development tend to integrate their financial sector supervisory structure. Similarly, improvements in overall public governance drive countries to adopting more integrated supervisory arrangements. (ii) Greater independence of the central bank could entail less integration of prudential supervision, but not necessarily of business conduct. (iii) Small open economies opt for more integrated structures of financial sector supervision, especially on the prudential side. (iv) Financial deepening makes countries integrate supervision progressively more, however, greater development of the non-bank financial system including capital markets and the insurance industry makes countries opt for less integrated prudential supervision but not business conduct supervision structures. (v) The lobbying power of concentrated and highly profitable banking sectors acts as a significant negative force against business conduct integration. (vi) Countries with banking sectors that have been more exposed to aggregate liquidity risk, due to their high share of external funding, tend to integrate more their prudential supervision. Finally, (vii) a country that has experienced past financial crises is more likely to integrate its supervisory structure for financial services.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Institutional structures of financial sector supervision, their drivers and emerging benchmark models |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Integrated Supervision, Prudential and Business Conduct Supervision, Financial Services, International Experience, Panel Data Analysis, Ordered Probit |
Subjects: | G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G18 - Government Policy and Regulation E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit > E50 - General G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services > G20 - General |
Item ID: | 37059 |
Depositing User: | Martin Melecky |
Date Deposited: | 02 Mar 2012 23:51 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 04:33 |
References: | Arnone, M., B. Laurens, J.F. Segalato, and M. Somer (2007). Central Bank Autonomy: Lessons from Global Trends. IMF WP/07/88 Arnone M. and A. Gambini (2006). Architectures of Supervisory Authorities and Banking Supervision. In Masciandaro, D., Quintyn, M. (Eds), Designing Financial Supervision Institutions: Independence, Accountability and Governance, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. Cihak, M. and R. Podpiera (2006). Is One Watchdog Better than Three? International Experience with Integrated Financial Sector Supervision. IMF WP/06/57. Green, W.H. (2003). Econometric Analysis. 5th edition. Prentice Hall, New Jersey Herring R. and J. Carmassi (2008). The Structure of Cross-Sector Financial Supervision. Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments, 17, 51-76. Erbenova, M. (2006). Integrating financial supervision in the Czech Republic. Law in Transition online, November 2006, Europena Bank for Development and Reconstruction. Kaufmann, D., A. Kraay and M. Mastruzzi (2010). The Worldwide Governance Indicators: A Summary of Methodology, Data and Analytical Issues. World Bank Policy Research, 2010 Laeven, L. and F. Valencia (2008). Systemic Banking Crises: A New Database. IMF WP/08/224. Masciandaro, D. (2006). E pluribus unum? Authorities design in financial supervision: Trends and determinants. Open Economies Review 17, 73-102. Masciandaro, D. (2007). Divide et impera: financial supervision unification and the central bank fragmentation effect. European Journal of Political Economy 23, 285-315. Masciandaro, D. and M. Quintyn (Eds) (2007). Designing Financial Supervision Institutions: Independence, Accountability and Governance. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham Masciandaro, D. (2009). Politicians and Financial Supervision Unification Outside the Central Bank: Why do they do it? Journal of Financial Stability 5, 124-146. Masciandaro, D., M. Quintyn, and M. Taylor (2008). Inside and outside the central bank: Independence and accountability in financial supervision. Trends and determinants. European Journal of Political Economy 24, 833-848. Masciandaro, D. and M. Quintyn (2008). Helping Hand or Grabbing Hand? Supervision Architecture, Financial Structure and Market View. North American Journal of Economics and Finance. Masciandaro, D. and M. Quintyn (2011). Regulating the Regulators: The Changing Face of Financial Supervision Architectures Before and After the Crisis. European Company Law (October 2009), 6 (5), 187-196 Shen, C.H. (2006). Determinants of the Financial Supervision System: Global Evidence, Banks and Bank Systems Volume 1, Issue 2. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/37059 |