Archana, Srivastava (2012): Heckscher Ohlin Vanek Theorem: an excess supply approach.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_38279.pdf Download (5MB) | Preview |
Abstract
The paper attempts to work out Heckscher Ohlin Vanek theorem with the help of excess supply approach. The study examines trade performance of ten manufacturing industries on a cross section of 46 countries for the year 2009. Factors taken into consideration are primary, secondary and tertiary educated labor, capital stock, arable land. Data sources such as world integrated trade solutions, Barro and Lee database, world development indicators, food and agriculture organisation etc are used to empirically test the theorem. The results suggest that capital stock, higher education and land are the factors which are creating comparative advantage in current trade pattern and further HOV theorem proves out to be still valid in more than 60% of the cases.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Heckscher Ohlin Vanek Theorem: an excess supply approach |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | HOV Theorem; Excess Supply Approach |
Subjects: | F - International Economics > F0 - General F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F10 - General C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C21 - Cross-Sectional Models ; Spatial Models ; Treatment Effect Models ; Quantile Regressions |
Item ID: | 38279 |
Depositing User: | Archana Srivastava |
Date Deposited: | 23 Apr 2012 00:44 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 04:27 |
References: | Baldwin, R. E. 1971. ‘Determinants of the Commodity Structure of U. S. Trade.’ American Economic Review 61: 126-146. Barro, R. J. and J.-W. Lee. 1993. ‘International Comparisons of Educational Attainment.’ Journal of Monetary Economics Vol 32, pp-363-394. Bowen, H. P., E. E. Leamer and L. Sveikauskas. 1987. ‘Multifactor, Multicountry Tests of the Factor Abundance Theory.’ American Economic Review 77: 791-809. Brecher, R. A. and E. Choudhri1982. ‘The Leontief Paradox: Continued.’ Journal of Political Economy 90: 820-823. Choi, Y.-S.and P. Krishna. 2004. ‘The Factor Content of Bilateral Trade: An Content of Trade: Evidence from U.S. Manufacturing.’ AEA Papers and Proceedings 90: 155 – 160. Daniel, T. 1993. ‘International Factor Price Differences: Leontief Was Right.’ Journal of Political Economy 101: 961 – 987. Daniel, T. and S. C. Zhu. 2000. ‘Beyond the Algebra of Explanation: HOV for the Technology Age.’ American Economic Review 90: 145 – 149. Davis, D.R. and D. E. Weinstein. 2001. ‘An Account of Global Factor Trade.’The American Economic Review 91: 1423 – 1453. Davis, D.R., D. E. Weinstein S. C. Bradford. and K. Shimpo. 1997. ‘Using International and Japanese Regional Data to Determine When the Factor Abundance Theory of Trade Works.’ The American Economic Review 87: 421 -446. Deardorff, A. 1984. ‘Testing Trade Theories and Predicting Trade Flows.’.Handbook of International Economics, ed. R.W. Jones and P.B. Kenen. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, Vol I, 467-517. Ethier, J. Wilfred. 1984. ‘Higher Dimensional Issues in Trade Theory.’ Handbook of International Economics. ed. R.W. Jones and P.B. Kenen. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, Vol I, pp 131-184. Hakura, D. S., 2001. ‘Why Does HOV Fail? The Role of Technological Differences within the EC.’ Journal of International Economics 54: 364 – 382. Harrigan, J. 1995. ‘Factor Endowments and the International Location of Production: Econometric Evidence for the OECD, 1970-1985.’ Journal of International Economics 39: 123-141. Jarslov, V. 1968. ‘The Factor Proportions Theory: The N Factor Case.’ Kyklos 21: 749 – 754. Lai, H., S. C. Zhu.2007. ‘Technology, Endowments, and the Factor Content of Bilateral Trade.’ Journal of International Economics 71: 389 – 409. Lee, J.-W.and R. J. Barro. 1997. ‘Schooling Quality in a Cross Section of Countries.’ NBER Working Paper 6198. Maskus, K. E. 1985. ‘A Test of the Heckscher Ohlin Vanek Theorem: The Leontief Commonplace.’ Journal of International Economics 19: 201 – 212. McCallum, J. 1995. ‘National Borders Matter: Canada- U.S. Regional Trade Pattern.’ American Economic Review85 (3):615-623. Ohlin, B. 1933. ‘Interregional and International Trade.’ NBER Working Paper No. 9321. Barro, R. J. and J.-W. Lee. 1996. “International Measures of Schooling Years and Schooling Quality.”American Economic Review 86(2): 218- 223. Woodland. A. D.1982. International Trade and Resource Relocation. Amsterdam, New York and Oxford: North Holland Publishing Company. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/38279 |