Niño-Zarazúa, Miguel (2012): Quantitative analysis in social sciences: An brief introduction for non-economists.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_39216.pdf Download (544kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In this paper, I present an introduction to quantitative research methods in social sciences. The paper is intended for non-Economics undergraduate students, development researchers and practitioners who although unfamiliar with statistical techniques, are interested in quantitative methods to study social phenomena. The paper discusses conventional methods to assess the direction, strength and statistical significance of the correlation between two or more variables, and examines regression techniques and experimental and quasi-experimental research designs to establish causality in the analysis of public interventions.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Quantitative analysis in social sciences: An brief introduction for non-economists |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Quantitative methods; Statistics; Social Sciences; Research Design; Development |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C10 - General C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C20 - General C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C0 - General > C00 - General |
Item ID: | 39216 |
Depositing User: | Dr Miguel Niño-Zarazúa |
Date Deposited: | 04 Jun 2012 13:49 |
Last Modified: | 03 Oct 2019 02:55 |
References: | Bamberger, M. and White, H. (2007) Using Strong Evaluation Designs in Developing Countries: Experience and Challenges, Journal of Multi-Disciplinary Evaluation, Volume 4, Number 8, 58-73 Bamberger, M, Rao, V., and Woolcock, M. (2010) Using Mixed Methods in Monitoring and Evaluation. Experiences from International Development. Policy Research Working Paper 5245, World Bank Banerjee, A., Duflo, E., Glennerster, R. & Kinnan, C. (2009) The Miracle of Microfinance? Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation. Cambridge, MA, MIT Department of Economics and Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab Barnett and Lewis (1985) Outliers in Statistical Data. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2d Ed, and Rousseeuw and Leroy (1987) Robust Regression and Outlier Detection. New York: John Wiley & Sons; and Iglewicz and Hoaglin (1993) How to Detect and Handle Outliers, American Society for Quality Control, Milwaukee, WI. Bertrand, M., Duflo. E and Mullainathan, S (2004) “How Much Should we Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates?” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119. pp: 249-76. Campbell, D and Stanley, J (1966) Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company; Shadish, W., Cook, T and Campbell, D (2001) Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference, Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing Card, D. and Krueger, A (1994) “Minimum Wages and Employment: A Case Study of the Fast-Food Industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania,” American Economic Review, 84, pp:772-93 Cohen, J (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. (2nd Ed), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Cohen, J. and Dupas, P. (2010) “Free distribution or Cost-sharing? Evidence from a Randomized Malaria Prevention Experiment”, Quaterly Journal of Economics, 15(1) Deaton (2009) Instruments of Development: Randomization in the Tropics, and the Search for the Elusive Keys to Economic Development. NBER Working Paper No. w14690 Duflo, E. (2003) “Grandmothers and Granddaughters: Old Age Pension and Intra-household Allocation in South Africa” World Bank Economic Review 17 (1): 1–26. Duflo, Glennerster and Kremer (2007) Using Randomisation in Development Economics Research: A Toolkit. CERP Discussion Paper 6059, London Duflo, E; Kremer, M. and Robinson, J.(forthcoming): Nudging Farmers to Use Fertilizer: Theory and Experimental Evidence from Kenya. American Economic Review Glewwe, P., M. Kremer, S. Moulin, and E. Zitzewitz (2004): “Retrospective Vs. Prospective Analyses of School Inputs: The Case of Flip Charts in Kenya,” Journal of Development Economics, 74, 251 268 Godtland, E., Sadoulet, E., de Janvry, A., Murgai, R., and Ortiz, O. (2004) “The Impact of Farmer-Field-Schools on Knowledge and Productivity: A Study of Potato Farmers in the Peruvian Andes.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 52 (1): 129–58 Gruber, J. and Poterba, J (2004) “Tax Incentives and the Decision to Purchase Health Insurance: Evidence from the Self-Employed,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109: pp:701-34 Gujarati, D (2003) Basic Econometrics. New York: McGraw Hill. Fourth Edition Harrison, G., and J. A. List (2004): “Field Experiments,” Journal of Economic Literature, XLII, 1013–1059. Heckman, J., Ichimura, H., and Todd, P. (1997) “Matching as an Econometric Evaluation Estimator: Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training Programme.” Review of Economic Studies 64 (4): 605–54. Hirano, K, Imbens, G. and Ridder, G. (2003) “Efficient Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Using the Estimated Propensity Score”, Econometrica, 71(4): 1161–89. Hoddinott, J. & Skoufias, E. (2004) The impact of PROGRESA on food consumption. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 53, 37-61. Jalan, J., and Ravallion, M. (2003). “Estimating the Benefi t Incidence of an Antipoverty Program by Propensity-Score Matching.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 21 (1): 19–30 Karlan, D. & Zinman, J. (2010) Expanding Credit Access: Using Randomized Supply Decisions to Estimate the Impacts. Review of Financial Studies, 23, 433-464 Karlan, D. and Zinman, J (2011) Microcredit in Theory and Practice: Using Randomized Credit Scoring for Impact Evaluation, Science, 332(6035), pp. 1278-1284 Khandker, Koolwal and Samad (2010) Handbook on Impact Evaluation. Quantitative Methods and Practices. Washington DC: The World Bank Markin, M (2005) Statistics for the Social Sciences. London: Sage Publications Niño-Zarazúa, M. (2009) Microcredit and Poverty in Mexico: An Impact Assessment in Urban Markets, Munich, Germany, VDM Verlag Ravallion (2009) Should Randomistas Rule? Economists’ Voice. February. Available at www.bepress.com/ev Schultz, T. P. (2004): “School subsidies for the poor: Evaluating the Mexican PROGRESA poverty program,” Journal of Development Economics, 74(1), 199–250 Wooldridge. J (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data Cambridge Massachusetts: The MIT Press, and Greene, W. (2011) Econometric Analysis, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 7th Ed. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/39216 |