Compton, Ryan and Nicholls, Christopher C. and Sandler, Daniel and Tedds, Lindsay (2011): Quantifying the Personal Income Tax Benefits of Backdating: A Canada - US Comparison. Published in: Columbia Journal of Tax Law , Vol. 3, No. 2 (2010): p. 145.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_39781.pdf Download (429kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper examines the pre- and post-tax returns to Canadian and US executives who receive backdated stock options (that appear to be at-the-money options) compared to currently-dated in-the-money options. We begin by comparing the Black-Scholes value of backdated at-the-money options to currently-dated in-the-money options (with the same strike price as the back-dated options). We then contrast the pre- and post-tax returns of such options on the assumption that the options are eventually exercised at a time when the options are in-the-money and the shares sold (either immediately or later) at a profit. We demonstrate that a Canadian executive can earn a significantly larger after-tax return from backdated options compared to a US executive due to the favourable Canadian tax treatment of executive options relative to their treatment in the United States. The comparison suggests that the personal tax regime may have had an impact on the desire to receive backdated options in lieu of other forms of compensation in Canada but not so in the United States.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Quantifying the Personal Income Tax Benefits of Backdating: A Canada - US Comparison |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Executive compensation, stock options, personal income tax |
Subjects: | J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J3 - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs > J38 - Public Policy H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H24 - Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and Subsidies K - Law and Economics > K3 - Other Substantive Areas of Law > K34 - Tax Law J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J3 - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs > J33 - Compensation Packages ; Payment Methods H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H26 - Tax Evasion and Avoidance |
Item ID: | 39789 |
Depositing User: | Lindsay Tedds |
Date Deposited: | 12 Nov 2019 14:45 |
Last Modified: | 12 Nov 2019 14:45 |
References: | Randall A. Heron & Erik Lie, What Fraction of Stock Option Grants to Top Executives Have Been Backdated or Manipulated?, 55 MGMT. SCI. 513 (2009) Erik Lie, On the Timing of CEO Stock Option Awards, 51 MGMT. SCI. 802 (2005) M. P. Narayanan & H. Nejat Seyhun, The Dating Game: Do Managers Designate Option Grant Dates to Increase Their Compensation?, 21 REV. FIN. STUD. 1907 (2008) M. P. Narayanan, Cindy A. Schipani & H. Nejat Seyhun, The Economic Impact of Backdating of Executive Stock Options, 105 MICH. L. REV. 1597 (2007) David I. Walker, Unpacking Backdating: Economic Analysis and Observations on the Stock Option Scandal, 87 B.C. L. REV. 561 (2007) Ryan A. Compton, Daniel Sandler & Lindsay M. Tedds, Options Backdating: A Canadian Perspective, 47 CAN. BUS. L. J. 363 (2009) Betty Wu, Is CEO Stock Option Backdating or Otherwise Manipulation Another Form of Option Repricing? 12 (Social Science Research Network, Working Paper, 2012). James Bickley & Gary Shorter, Stock Options: The Backdating Issues, TAX NOTES TODAY, March 23, 2007, LEXIS 2007 TNT 57-17, at 16. Rick Edelson & Scott Whisenant, A Study of Companies with Abnormally Favourable Patterns of Executive Stock Option Grant Timing 20 (Social Science Research Network, Working Paper, 2009). Randall A. Heron & Erik Lie, Does Backdating Explain the Stock Price Pattern Around Executive Stock Option Grants, 83 J. FIN. ECON. 271, 273 (2007). Lara E. Muller, Stock Option Backdating: Is the Government’s Response Enough to Eliminate the Problem or Is It Still a Work in Progress, 51 SANTA CLARA L. REV. 331, 349-50 (2011). Michael J. Graetz, Tax Reform Unraveling, 21 J. ECON. PERSP. 69, 83 (2007); Jeri Seidman & Bridget Stomberg, Stock-based Compensation and Tax Sheltering: Are They Negatively Related Due to Incentives of Tax Benefits? 4 (McCombs Research Paper Series, Working Paper No. ACC 03-11, 2011). Fischer Black & Myron Scholes, The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities, 81 J. POL. ECON. 637, 637-52 (1973). Amin Mawani, Cancellation of Executive Stock Options: Tax and Accounting Income Considerations, 20 CONTEMP. ACCT. RES. 495, 499-500 (2003). Charles Forelle & James Bandler, Five More Companies Show Questionable Options Pattern, WALL ST. J., May 22, 2006 Geoffrey Manne & Joshua D. Wright, Backdating Options and Why Executive Compensation Is Not All About Norms, 2 CORP. GOVERNANCE L. REV. 385, 392 (2006) Kristina Minnick & Mengxin Zhao, Backdating and Director Incentives: Money or Reputation?, 32 J. FIN. RES. 449, 450-51 (2009). Lucian A. Bebchuk & Jesse M. Fried, Executive Compensation as an Agency Problem, 17 J. ECON. PERSP. 71, 79 (2003) Yonca Ertimur et al., Reputation Penalties for Poor Monitoring of Executive Pay: Evidence from Option Backdating, 104 J. FIN. ECON. 118, 119 (2012). EDWARD F. KOREN ET AL., ESTATE TAX & PERSONAL FINANCIAL PLANNING § 2:68 (2012). Daniel Sandler, The Tax Treatment of Employee Stock Options: Generous to a Fault, 49 CAN. TAX J. 259 (2001) Francine J. Lipman, Incentive Stock Options and the Alternative Minimum Tax: The Worst of Time, 39 HARV. J. ON LEGIS. 337 (2002) Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010, Pub. L. No. 111-312, 124 Stat 3296 David Joulfaian, Corporate Tax Evasion and Managerial Preferences, 82 REV. ECON. &STAT. 698, 698-99 (2000). Michael G. Allingham & Agnar Sandmo, Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical Analysis, 1 J. PUB. ECON. 323 (1972) Kim Border & Joel Sobel, Samurai Accountant: A Theory of Audit and Plunder, 54 REV. ECON. STUD. 525 (1987) Helmuth Cremer, Maurice Marchand & Pierre Pestieau, Evading, Auditing and Taxing: the Equity-Compliance Tradeoff, 43 J. PUB. ECON. 67 (1990) Dilip Mookherjee & Ivan P.L. Png, Optimal Auditing, Insurance and Redistribution, 104 Q. J. ECON. 399 (1989) Isabel Sanchez & Joel Sobel, Hierarchical Design and Enforcement of Income Tax Policies, 50 J. PUB. ECON. 345 (1993) Suzanne Scotchmer, Audit Classes and Tax Enforcement Policy, 77 AM. ECON. REV. 229 (1987) ( Greg Trandel & Arthur Snow, Progressive Income Taxation and the Underground Economy, 62 ECON. LETTERS 217 (1999) Harry Watson, Tax Evasion and Labor Markets, 27 J. PUB. ECON. 231 (1985) James Andreoni, Brian Erard, & Jonathan Feinstein, Tax Compliance, 36 J. ECON. LITERATURE 818, 818-19, 823-25 (1998) Joel Slemrod & Shlomo Yitzhaki, Tax Avoidance, Evasion, and Administration, in 3 HANDBOOK OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS 1423, 1429-36 (A. J. Auerbach and M. Felstein eds., 2002). Jennifer N. Carpenter & Barbara Remmers, Executive Stock Option Exercises and Insider Information, 74 J. BUS. 513, 514 (2001) Eli Ofek and David Yermack, Taking Stock: Equity-based Compensation and the Evolution of Managerial Ownership, 55 J. FIN. 1367, 1368 (2000). Julius Melnitzer, Manipulation ‘Serious Problem’, FIN. POST, Sept. 19, 2007, at FP1. SAM LA BELL &CHRIS SILVESTREWHY, VERITAS INVESTMENT RESEARCH, STOCK OPTION BACKDATING: COULD IT HAPPEN HERE? 3 (2006). Daniel Sandler, The Adventure in Venture Capital: Capital Gains vs. Ordinary Income, 42 TAX NOTES INT’L 621 (2006) Emmanuel Saez & Michael Veall, The Evolution of High Incomes in Northern America: Lessons from Canadian Evidence, 95 AM. ECON. REV. 831, 837, 845 (2005) Dan Dhaliwal et al., Taxes and the Backdating of Stock Option Exercise Dates, 47 J. ACCT. &ECON. 27, 27-29 (2009) |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/39789 |