Coleman, Stephen (2012): Diffusion and Spatial Equilibrium of a Social Norm: Voting Participation in the United States, 1920-2008.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_43509.pdf Download (213kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Social conformity can spread social norms and behaviors through a society. This research examines such a process geographically and over time for voting, which is strongly influenced by the norm that citizens should vote. A mathematical model for the spread of voting participation under the influence of social conformity is developed based on the diffusion equation, and predictions are tested with spatial analysis of state-level voter turnout in American presidential elections from 1920 to 2008. Results show that voter turnout has converged to a stable equilibrium in its geographical distribution across the states—but it is an equilibrium that results in persistent differences at the state level. Turnout increases about one percentage point with each degree of latitude.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Diffusion and Spatial Equilibrium of a Social Norm: Voting Participation in the United States, 1920-2008 |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | social norm; voter turnout; social conformity; spatial model; equilibrium; diffusion |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C0 - General > C02 - Mathematical Methods D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z13 - Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology ; Social and Economic Stratification C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C21 - Cross-Sectional Models ; Spatial Models ; Treatment Effect Models ; Quantile Regressions |
Item ID: | 43509 |
Depositing User: | Dr Stephen Coleman |
Date Deposited: | 31 Dec 2012 21:49 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 21:47 |
References: | Anselin, L., Sybari, I., and Kho, Y. 2006. GeoDa: An introduction to spatial data analysis. Geographical Analysis 38: 5-22. Barash, V. 2011. The Dynamics of Social Contagion. Doctoral Dissertation. Cornell University. Bartholomew, D.J. 1982. Stochastic Models for Social Processes. NY: Wiley. Blais, A. 2000. To Vote or Not to Vote: The Merits and Limits of Rational Choice Theory. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. Brock, W.A. and Durlauf, S.N. 2001. Discrete choices with social interactions. The Review of Economic Studies, 68: 235-260. Calvo, E., and Escolar, M. 2003. The local voter: A geographically weighted approach to ecological inference. American Journal of Political Science 47: 189-204. Castellano, C., Fortunato, S. and Loreto, V. 2009. Statistical physics of social dynamics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81: 591-656. Cialdini, R.B. 1993. Influence: Science and Practice. 3rd ed. N.Y.: Harper Collins. Cialdini, R.B., Reno, R.R., and Kallgren, C.A. 1990. A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58: 1015-1026. Cohen, J. and Tita, G. 1999. Diffusion in homicide: Exploring a general method for detecting spatial diffusion processes. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 15: 451-493. Coleman, S. 2002. A test for the effect of social conformity on crime rates using voter turnout. Sociological Quarterly 43: 257-276. Coleman, S. 2004. The effect of social conformity on collective voting behavior. Political Analysis 12: 76-96. Coleman, S. 2007a. Popular Delusions: How Social Conformity Molds Society and Politics. Youngstown, NY: Cambria Press. Coleman, S. 2007b. Testing theories with qualitative and quantitative predictions. European Political Science 5: 124-133. Coleman, S. 2010. [Коулман, С.] Реформа российской избирательной системы и влияние социальной конформности на голосование и партийную систему: 2007 и 2008 годы [Russian election reform and the effect of social conformity on voting and the party system: 2007 and 2008.] Журнала Новой экономической ассоциации [Journal of the New Economic Association (Moscow)] 5: 72-90. English version at http://www.econorus.org/enjournal.phtml. Darmofal, D. 2008. The political geography of the New Deal realignment. American Politics Research 36: 934-961. Efron, B. and Tibshirani, R.J. 1998. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Baton Rouge, FL: Chapman and Hall. Garabedian, P.R. 1964. Partial Differential Equations. New York: Wiley. Gerber, A., Green, D.P., and Larimer, C. 2008. Social pressure and voter turnout: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. American Political Science Review 102: 33-48. Gerber, A, and Rogers, T. 2009. Descriptive social norms and motivation to vote: Everybody’s voting and so should you. Journal of Politics 71: 178-191. Granovetter, M. 1978. Threshold models of collective behavior. The American Journal of Sociology 83: 1420-1443 Grimm, V. 1999. Ten years of individual-based modeling in ecology: what have we learned and what could we learn in the future? Ecological Modelling 116:129-148. Haining, R. 2003. Spatial Data Analysis: Theory and Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press. Helbing, D. 1998. A mathematical model of the behavior of individuals in a social field. arXiv:cond-mat/9805194v1 [cond-mat.stat-mech]. Hoffman, J.D., 1992. Numerical Methods for Scientists and Engineers. NY: McGraw-Hill. Huckfeldt, R. and Sprague, J. 1995. Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. NY: Cambridge University Press. Kellogg, O. D. 1953. Foundations of Potential Theory. New York: Dover. Kenny, C. B. 1992. Political participation and effects from the social environment. American Journal of Political Science 36: 259-267. Knack, S. 1992. Civic norms, social sanctions, and voter turnout. Rationality and Society 4: 133-156. Knack, S. and Kropf, M.E.. 1998. For shame! The effect of community cooperative context and the probability of voting. Political Psychology 19: 585-599. MacAllister, I. R., Johnston, R., Pattie, C. Tunstall, J.H., Dorling, D., and Rossiter, D.G.. 2001. Class dealignment and the neighborhood effect: Miller revisited. British Journal of Political Science 31: 41-60. McClurg, S. D. 2003. Social networks and participation: The role of social interaction in explaining political participation. Political Research Quarterly 56: 449-464. Messner, S.F., Anselin, L., Baller, R.D., Hawkins, D.F., Deane, G., and Tolnay, S.E.. 1999. The spatial patterning of county homicide rates: An application of exploratory data analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 15: 423-450. Morris, S. 2000. Contagion. Review of Economic Studies, 67: 57-78. Mutz, D. 2002. The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science 46: 838-855. Mutz, D. 1992. Impersonal influence: Effects of representations of public opinion on political attitudes. Political Behavior 14: 89-122. Myers, D. J. 2000. The diffusion of collective violence: Infectiousness, susceptibility, and mass media networks. The American Journal of Sociology 106: 173-208. Nowak, A. and Vallacher, R.R. 1998. Dynamical Social Psychology. New York: Guilford Press. O’Loughlin, J., Flint, C., and Anselin, L. 1994. The geography of the Nazi vote: Context, confession, and class in the Reichstag election of 1930. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 84: 351-380. Pronin, E., Berger, J., and Moluki, S. 2007. Alone in a crowd of sheep: Asymmetric perceptions of conformity and their Roots in an introspection illusion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92: 585-595. Shin, M. E. 2001. The politicization of place in Italy. Political Geography 20: 331-352. Shin, M. E., and Agnew, J. 2007. The geographical dynamics of Italian electoral change. Electoral Studies 26: 287-302. Tam Cho, W. and Rudolph, T.R. 2008. Emanating political participation: Untangling the spatial structure behind participation. British Journal of Political Science 38: 273-289. Tolnay, S. E., Deane, G. and Beck, E.M. 1996. Vicarious violence: Spatial effects of Southern lynchings. The American Journal of Sociology 102: 788-815. Valente, T.W. 2005. Network models and methods for studying the diffusion of innovations. In P.J. Carrington, J. Scott, and S. Wasserman, (Eds.), Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis (pp. 98-116). NY: Cambridge University Press. Ward, M. and Gleditsch, K. 2008. Spatial Regression Models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Wolfinger, R.E. and Rosenstone, S.J. 1980. Who Votes? New Haven: Yale University Press. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/43509 |