Disregarded inefficiency may dominate sustainability policies

Bazhanov, Andrei (2012): Disregarded inefficiency may dominate sustainability policies.

Abstract

This paper examines the effects of ignored inefficiencies on the reliability of sustainability indicators and effectiveness of investment in resource-based economies. A model of a social planner does not include some phenomena that may influence the path of utility. These unspecified phenomena may cause inefficiency of the economy. In order to simulate this natural discrepancy between theory and real life, this study assumes that the planner applies the policies developed for an efficient (undistorted) model, whereas the real economy is distorted by some neglected effects that can influence utility, production, the balance equation, and the dynamics of the reserve. The resulting inefficiency affects the dependence of current utility change on investment. The analysis shows that, for sustainability in the presence of inefficiency, first, institutional and resource policies may become more important than investments; and secondly, it is preferable to underextract a natural resource under uncertainties in production possibilities and damages from economic activities. An inadequate accounting system, underestimated production possibilities, and insecure property rights are considered as examples of disregarded inefficiencies.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Dynamic inefficiency; Investment; Natural resource; Sustainability
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q3 - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation > Q32 - Exhaustible Resources and Economic Development; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q3 - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation > Q38 - Government Policy; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O47 - Empirical Studies of Economic Growth ; Aggregate Productivity ; Cross-Country Output Convergence; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O13 - Agriculture ; Natural Resources ; Energy ; Environment ; Other Primary Products

References

1. Aronsson, Thomas and Karl-Gustaf Löfgren. 2010. An introduction to the theory of social accounting. In: Handbook of Environmental Accounting. Aronsson, Thomas and Karl-Gustaf Löfgren (eds). Edward Elgar, pp 1–27.

2. Arrow, Kenneth J., Partha Dasgupta, and Karl G. Mäler. 2003. Evaluating projects and assessing sustainable development in imperfect economies. Environmental and Resource Economics 26: 647–85.

3. Asheim, Geir. 2010. The relationship between welfare measures and indicators of sustainable development. In: Handbook of Environmental Accounting. Aronsson, Thomas and Karl-Gustaf Löfgren (eds). Edward Elgar, pp 237–56.

4. Barnett, Steven and Rolando Ossowski. 2003. Operational aspects of fiscal policy in oil-producing countries. In: Fiscal Policy Formulation and Implementation in Oil-Producing Countries. Davis, Jeffrey M., Rolando Ossowski, and Annalisa Fedelino (eds). International Monetary Fund, pp 45–81.

5. Bazhanov, Andrei V. 2008. Sustainable growth in a resource-based economy: the extraction-saving relationship. MPRA paper No. 23299.

6. Bazhanov, Andrei V. 2010. Sustainable growth: compatibility between a plausible growth criterion and the initial state. Resources Policy 35(2): 116–25.

7. Bazhanov, Andrei V. 2011. The dependence of the potential sustainability of a resource economy on the initial state: a comparison of models using the example of Russian oil extraction. The Journal of the New Economic Association 12: 1–20.

8. Bazhanov, Andrei V. 2012. A closed-form solution to Stollery's problem with damage in utility. Computational Economics 39(4): 365–86.

9. Dasgupta, Partha, and Geoffrey Heal. 1974. The optimal depletion of exhaustible resources. Review of Economic Studies 41: 3–28.

10. Dasgupta, Partha, and Geoffrey Heal. 1979. Economic theory and exhaustible resources. Cambridge University Press.

11. Dasgupta, Partha, and Karl G. Mäler. 2000. Net national product, wealth, and social well-being. Environment and Development Economics 5: 69–93.

12. D'Autume, Antoine, and Katheline Schubert 2008. Hartwick's rule and maximin paths when the exhaustible resource has an amenity value. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 56: 260–74.

13. Dixit, Avinash, Peter Hammond, and Michael Hoel. 1980. On Hartwick’s rule for regular maximin paths of capital accumulation and resource depletion. Review of Economic Studies 47: 551–56.

14. EU 2011. Regulation (EU) No 691/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 2011 on European environmental economic accounts. Official Journal of the European Union L 192 54: 1–16.

15. Gaudet, Gerard. 2007. Natural resource economics under the rule of Hotelling. Canadian Journal of Economics 40(4): 1033–59.

16. Gaudet, Gerard, Michel Moreaux, and Cees Withagen. 2006. The Alberta dilemma: optimal sharing of a water resource by an agricultural and an oil sector. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 52: 548–66.

17. Hamilton, Kirk. 2010. Genuine saving, social welfare and rules for sustainability. In: Handbook of Environmental Accounting. Aronsson, Thomas and Karl-Gustaf Löfgren (eds). Edward Elgar, pp 257–78.

18. Hamilton, Kirk, and Michael Clemens. 1999. Genuine savings rates in developing countries. World Bank Economic Review 13(2): 333–56.

19. Hamilton, Kirk, and John M. Hartwick. 2005. Investing exhaustible resource rents and the path of consumption. Canadian Journal of Economics 38: 615–21.

20. Hamilton, Kirk, Giovanni Ruta, and Liaila Tajibaeva. 2006. Capital accumulation and resource depletion: a Hartwick Rule counterfactual. Environmental and Resource Economics 34: 517–33.

21. Hamilton, Kirk, and Cees Withagen. 2007. Savings growth and the path of utility Canadian Journal of Economics 40: 703–13.

22. Hartwick, John M. 1977. Intergenerational equity and the investing of rents from exhaustible resources. American Economic Review 67: 972–974.

23. Hurwicz, Leonid 1960. Optimality and informational efficiency in resource allocation processes. In: Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences. Arrow, Kenneth J., Samuel Karlin, and Patrick Suppes (eds). Stanford University Press, pp 27–46.

24. Jafarov, Etibar, Hajime Takizawa, Harm Zebregs, and Fabrizio Balassone 2006. Russian Federation. Selected issues. IMF Country Report No 06/430. International Monetary Fund.

25. Leonard, Daniel, and Ngo V. Long. 1992. Optimal control theory and static optimization in economics. Cambridge University Press.

26. Pearce, David W., and Giles D. Atkinson. 1993. Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of "weak" sustainability. Ecological Economics 8: 103–08.

27. Pezzey, John C. V. 1992. Sustainable development concepts: An economic analysis. World Bank Environment Paper No. 2. World Bank.

28. Pezzey, John C. V. 2004. One-sided sustainability tests with amenities, and changes in technology, trade and population. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 48: 613–31.

29. Proops, John L.R., Giles D. Atkinson, Burkhard Frhr. v. Schlotheim BFv, and Sandrine Simon. 1999. International trade and the sustainability footprint: a practical criterion for its assessment. Ecological Economics 28: 75–97.

30. Solow, Robert M. 1974. Intergenerational equity and exhaustible resources. Review of Economic Studies 41: 29–45.

31. Stollery, Kenneth R. 1998. Constant utility paths and irreversible global warming Canadian Journal of Economics 31: 730–42.

32. Takayama, Akira 1980. Optimal technical progress with exhaustible resources. In: Exhaustible Resources, Optimality and Trade. Kemp, Murrey C. and Ngo V. Long (eds). North-Holland, pp 95–110.

33. UN 1993. Handbook of National Accounting: Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting. Series F, No. 61. United Nations.

34. van der Ploeg, Frederick 2011. Rapacious resource depletion, excessive investment and insecure property rights: a puzzle. Environmental and Resource Economics 48: 105–28.