New measures of workforce skills in the EU

Kang, Lili and O'Mahony, Mary and Peng, Fei (2012): New measures of workforce skills in the EU. Published in: National Institute Economic Review , Vol. 220, (April 2012)

Abstract

This paper presents new data series designed to yield a more complete picture of the growth in average skill levels embedded in the EU workforce, comparing with competitor countries such as the US and China. Harmonised data from EU surveys are employed to extend coverage in existing databases to more countries, to cover the period of the financial crisis, and to skills acquired through informal workforce training. The results indicate growth in labour quality in the EU15 marginally below the US, convergence of the group of new member states to the EU15 but no sign of convergence of China to more developed regions. There is evidence of a pronounced rise in labour quality in most countries after 2007, consistent with theories of labour hoarding, but with some notable exceptions. Expanding the conventional measures of labour quality to include informal training leads to small but significant increases in the growth of human capital in some EU15 member states.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Workforce skills; training; financial crisis
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O15 - Human Resources ; Human Development ; Income Distribution ; Migration; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J24 - Human Capital ; Skills ; Occupational Choice ; Labor Productivity; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I25 - Education and Economic Development

References

Barslund, M. (2012), ‘Recent developments in selected education indicators and their relation to Europe 2020 targets’, National Institute Economic Review, 220, April, pp. 6–16.

Benhabib, J. and Spiegel, M. (1994), ‘The role of human capital in economic development evidence from aggregate cross-country data’, Journal of Monetary Economics, 34 (2), pp. 143–73.

Corrado, C.A., Hulten, C.R. and Sichel, D. (2005), ‘Measuring capital and technology: an expanded framework’, in Corrado, C., Haltiwanger, J. and Sichel, D. (eds), Measuring Capital in the New Economy, Studies in Income and Wealth, Vol. 65, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.

—(2009), ‘Intangible capital and US economic growth’, The Review of Income and Wealth, 55 (3), pp. 661–85.

Fukao, K., Sumio, H., Tsutomu, M. and Konomi, T. (2009), ‘Intangible investment in Japan: measurement and contribution to economic growth’, Review of Income and Wealth, 55(3), pp. 717–36.

Galor, O. (2004), ‘From physical to human capital accumulation: inequality and the process of development’, The Review of Economic Studies, 71 (4), pp. 1001–26.

Glaeser, E.L., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F. and Shleifer, A. (2004), ‘Do institutions cause growth’, Journal of Economic Growth, 9 (3), pp. 271–303.

Giorgio-Marrano, M., Haskel, J. and Wallis, G. (2009), ‘What happened to the knowledge economy? ICT, intangible investment and Britain’s productivity record revisited’, Review of Income and Wealth, 55(3), pp. 686–716.

Lucas, R.E.J. (1988). ‘On the mechanics of economic development’, Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, pp. 3–42.

Jalava, J., Aulin-Amhavarra, P. and Alanen, A. (2007), ‘Intangible capital in the Finnish business sector, 1975–2005’, ETLA – The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy, discussion paper no. 1103.

Jona-Lasinio, C., Iommi, M. and Roth, F. (2009), ‘Report on gathering information and estimations for the Innodrive project – macro approach’, mimeo, Innodrive project.

Jorgenson, D.W. and Fraumeni, B. (1992), ‘The output of the education sector’, in Griliches, Z. (ed.), Output Measurement in the Services Sector, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

Jorgenson, D.W., Gollop, F.M. and Fraumeni, B. (1987), Productivity and U.S. Economic Growth, Cambridge, MA, Harvard Economic Studies.

Jorgenson, D.W., Ho, M.S. and Stiroh, K.J. (2005), Information Technology and the American Growth Resurgence, Cambridge,MA, MIT Press.

Kang, L. (2012), ‘Essays on human capital and productivity analysis in China’, PhD Thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham.

Kang, L. and Peng, F.(2012), ‘A selection analysis on education returns in China’, Post-Communist Economics,pp. 535-554

Mason, G., Barrell, R., Fic, T., Holland, D., Liadze, I., Maimaiti, Y., O’Mahony, M., Peng, F., Riley, R., Rincon, A., and Whitworth, R. (2012), ‘Macroeconomic benefits of vocational education and training’, Draft final report to CEDEFOP, mimeo, NIESR.

Oi, W. (1962), ‘Labour as a quasi-fixed factor’, Journal of Political Economy, 70, 6, pp. 538–55.

O’Mahony, M. (2012), ‘Human capital formation and continuous training: evidence For EU countries’, Review of Income and Wealth,

O’Mahony, M. and Timmer, M.P. (2009), ‘Output, input and productivity measures at the industry level: the EU KLEMS Database’, The Economic Journal, 119 (538), F374–F403.

van Rooijen-Horsten, M., van den Bergen, D. and Tanriseven, M.(2008), ‘Intangible capital in the Netherlands: a benchmark’, Statistics Netherlands, Discussion paper no. 08001.