Technological change and international interaction in environmental policies

Furukawa, Yuichi and Takarada, Yasuhiro (2013): Technological change and international interaction in environmental policies.

Abstract

This paper considers the impact of differences in endogenous technological change between two countries on global pollution emissions under international strategic interaction in environmental policies. First, we demonstrate that an environmentally lagging country's technology may continue to advance through a learning-by-doing effect until it exceeds the environmental friendliness of a leading country that initially had the cleanest technology (i.e., environmental leapfrogging could occur). Whether a country eventually becomes an environmentally leading country depends on the country size and its awareness of environmental quality. Second, we find that global emissions fluctuate despite the fact that environmental technology advances in both countries. Global emissions eventually become constant because both countries cease to tighten environmental regulations when their technologies are sufficiently clean. The final emissions might be larger than emissions in early stages of adjustment under dirty technologies. If environmental leapfrogging frequently occurs, both countries possess similarly clean technologies, thereby reducing long-term global pollution.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Environmental policy; leapfrogging; learning-by-doing; strategic interaction; technological change; transboundary pollution
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O30 - General; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q55 - Technological Innovation; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O44 - Environment and Growth

References

Acemoglu, Daron, Philippe Aghion, Leonardo Bursztyn, and David Hemous (2012) The environment and directed technical change, American Economic Review 102 (1), 131-166.

Bosetti, Valentina, Carlo Carraro, Emanuele Massetti, and Massimo Tavoni (2008) International energy R&D spillovers and the economics of greenhouse gas atmospheric stabilization, Energy Economics 30 (6), 2912-2929.

Bovenberg, A. Lans and Sjak A. Smulders (1996) Transitional impacts of environmental policy in an endogenous growth model, International Economic Review 37 (4), 861-893.

Brezis, Elise S. and Daniel Tsiddon (1998) Economic growth, leadership and capital flows: the leapfrogging effect, Journal of International Trade and Economic Development 7 (3), 261-277.

Brezis, Elise S., Paul R. Krugman, and Daniel Tsiddon (1993) Leapfrogging in international competition: a theory of cycles in national technological leadership, American Economic Review 83 (5), 1211-1219.

Copeland, Brian. R. and M. Scott Taylor (2003) Trade and the Environment: Theory and Evidence, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Dasgupta, Susmita, Benoit Laplante, Hua Wang, and David Wheeler (2002) Confronting the environmental Kuznets curve, Journal of Economic Perspectives 16 (1), 147-168.

Dechezleprêtre, Antoine, Matthieu Glachant, Ivan Haščič, Nick Johnstone, and Yann Ménière (2011) Invention and transfer of climate change-mitigation technologies: A global analysis, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 5 (1), 109-130.

Desmet, Klaus (2002) A simple dynamic model of uneven development and overtaking, Economic Journal 112 (482), 894-918.

Dinda, Soumyananda (2004) Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey, Ecological Economics 49 (4), 431-455.

Fischer, Carolyn and Richard G. Newell (2008) Environmental and technology policies for climate mitigation, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 55 (2), 142-162.

Gallagher, Kelly Sims (2006) Limits to leapfrogging in energy technologies? Evidence from the Chinese automobile industry, Energy Policy 34 (4), 383-394.

Giovannetti, Emanuele (2001) Perpetual leapfrogging in Bertrand duopoly, International Economic Review 42 (3), 671-696.

Goulder, Lawrence H. and Koshy Mathai (2000) Optimal CO2 abatement in the presence of induced technological change, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 39 (1), 1-38.

Grimaud, André and Frederic Tournemaine (2007) Why can an environmental policy tax promote growth through the channel of education?, Ecological Economics 62 (1), 27-36.

Grossman, Gene M. and Alan B. Krueger (1993) Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement, in The Mexico-U.S. Free Trade Agreement, ed. P. Garber, Cambridge: MIT Press.

Huber, Joseph (2008) Pioneer countries and the global diffusion of environmental innovations: Theses from the viewpoint of ecological modernisation theory, Global Environmental Change 18 (3), 360-367.

IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: Mitigation of climate change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

IPCC (2008) Climate change 2007: Synthesis report, Geneva: IPCC.

IPCC (2011) Renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lanjouw, Jean Olson and Ashoka Mody (1996) Innovation and the international diffusion of environmentally responsive technology, Research Policy 25 (4), 549-571.

Motta, Massimo, Jacques-Francois Thisse, and Antonio Cabrales (1997) On the persistence of leadership or leapfrogging in international trade, International Economic Review 38 (4), 809-824.

Newell, Richard G., Adam B. Jaffe, and Robert N. Stavins (1999) The induced innovation hypothesis and energy-saving technological change, Quarterly Journal of Economics 114 (3), 941-975.

OECD (2012) OECD environmental outlook to 2050: The consequences of inaction, Paris: OECD.

Ohyama, Michihiro and Ronald W. Jones (1995) Technology choice, overtaking and comparative advantage, Review of International Economics 3 (2), 224-234.

Perkins, Richard (2003) Environmental leapfrogging in developing countries: A critical assessment and reconstruction, Natural Resources Forum 27 (3), 177-188.

Popp, David (2002) Induced innovation and energy prices, American Economic Review 92 (1), 160-180.

Popp, David (2012) The role of technological change in green growth, NBER Working Paper, No. 18506.

Quah, Danny (1996a) Regional convergence clusters across Europe, European Economic Review 40 (3-5), 951-958.

Quah, Danny (1996b) Empirics for economic growth and convergence, European Economic Review 40 (6), 1353-1375.

Romer, Paul (1986) Increasing returns and long-run growth, Journal of Political Economy 94 (5), 1002-1037.

Schou, Poul (2002) Pollution externalities in a model of endogenous fertility and growth, International Tax and Public Finance 9 (6), 709-725.

Stern, David I. (2004) The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve, World Development 32 (8), 1419-1439.

van de Klundert, Theo and Sjak Smulders (2001) Loss of technological leadership of rentier economies: a two-country endogenous growth model, Journal of International Economics 54 (1), 211-231.

Walz, Rainer (2010) Competences for green development and leapfrogging in newly industrializing countries, International Economics and Economic Policy 7 (2-3), 245-265.

Watson, Jim and Raphael Sauter (2011) Sustainable innovation through leapfrogging: A review of the evidence, International Journal of Technology and Globalisation 5 (3-4), 170-189.

World Bank (2003) World development report 2003: Sustainable development in a dynamic world, New York: Oxford University Press.