Li, Yao Amber (2010): International Trade, Technology Diffusion, and the Role of Diffusion Barriers.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_44422.pdf Download (335kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper assesses the welfare impact of trade and technology diffusion as well as the change in the cross-country distribution of GDP due to removal of trade costs and diffusion barriers. The model extends the multi-country Ricardian trade model of Alvarez and Lucas (2007) to include technology diffusion with diffusion barriers. A key feature of the model is that some countries export goods produced by foreign technology via diffusion. The model is calibrated to match the world GDP distribution, the merchandise trade and technology diffusion shares of GDP, and real GDP per capita for a sample of 31 countries. Data on international trade in royalties, license fees, and information intensive services are used as proxies for international technology diffusion. There are three key findings. First, the welfare gains from removing diffusion barriers are 4--60% across countries, generally larger than the gains from removing trade costs (8--40%). The main reason is that diffusion has a larger impact on the nontradable sector due to the substitutability between trade and diffusion in the tradable sector. Second, removing trade costs and diffusion barriers has little impact on reducing the dispersion of real GDP per capita (measured by Gini index) across countries. Compared to the benchmark, free diffusion decreases the Gini by 4%, and free trade decreases the Gini by 2%. Third, removing diffusion barriers increases trade, which indicates that diffusion may enhance trade.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | International Trade, Technology Diffusion, and the Role of Diffusion Barriers |
English Title: | International Trade, Technology Diffusion, and the Role of Diffusion Barriers |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | trade; technology diffusion; diffusion barriers; trade costs; welfare gains; GDP distribution; knowledge trade |
Subjects: | F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F15 - Economic Integration O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O11 - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F17 - Trade Forecasting and Simulation O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O40 - General |
Item ID: | 44422 |
Depositing User: | Yao Amber Li |
Date Deposited: | 16 Feb 2013 14:09 |
Last Modified: | 03 Oct 2019 11:57 |
References: | Alvarez, F., and R. J. Lucas (2007): “General equilibrium analysis of the Eaton-Kortum model of international trade”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 54(6), 1726-1768. Anderson, J. E., and E. V. Wincoop (2004): “Trade Costs”, Journal of Economic Literature, XLII, 691-751. Arkolakis, C., N. Ramondo, A. Rodriguez-Clare, and S. Yeaple (2011): “Proximity versus Comparative Advantage: A Quantitative Theory of Trade and Multinational Production”, Working Paper. Blonigen, B. A., R. B. Davies, and K. Head (2003): “Estimating the Knowledge-Capital Model of the Multinational Enterprise: Comment”, American Economic Review, 93(3), 980-994. Breinlich, H., and C. Criscuolo (2011): “International trade in services: A portrait of importers and exporters”, Journal of International Economics, 84(2), 188-206. Bridgman, B. R., I. D. Livshits, and J. C. MacGee (2007): “Vested interests and technology Adoption”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 54(3), 649-666. Chaney, T. (2008): “Technological Mismatch: a Model of International Trade in Goods and Ideas”, Unpublished, University of Chicago. Comin, D., B. Hobijn, and E. Rovito (2006): “Five Facts You Need to Know about Technology Diffusion”, NBER Working Paper 11928. Eaton, J., and S. Kortum (1996): “Trade in Ideas: Patenting and Productivity in the OECD”, Journal of International Economics, 40(3-4), 251-278. Eaton, J., and S. Kortum (1999): “International Technology Diffusion: Theory and Measurement”, International Economic Review, 40(3), 537-70. Eaton, J., and S. Kortum (2001): “Technology, trade, and growth: A unified framework”, European Economic Review, 45(4-6), 742-755. Eaton, J., and S. Kortum (2002): “Technology, Geography, and Trade”, Econometrica, 70, 1741-1779. Eaton, J., and S. Kortum (2005): “Technology in the Global Economy: A Framework for Quantitative Analysis”, Unpublished Manuscript. Eaton, J., and S. Kortum (2006): “Innovation, Diffusion, and Trade”, NBER Working Paper 12385. Helpman, E., M. Melitz, and Y. Rubinstein (2007): “Estimating Trade Flows: Trading Partners and Trading Volumes”, NBER Working Paper No. 12927. Helpman, E., M. J. Melitz, and S. R. Yeaple (2004): “Export Versus FDI with Heterogeneous Firms”, American Economic Review, 94(1), 300-316. Irarrazabal, A., A. Moxnes, and L. D. Opromolla (2009): “The Margins of Multinational Production and the Role of Intra-firm trade”, Discussion paper, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers. Keller, W. (2002): “Geographic Localization of International Technology Diffusion”, American Economic Review, 92(1), 120-142. Keller, W. (2004): “International Technology Diffusion”, Journal of Economic Literature, 42(3), 752-782. Keller, W., and S. Yeaple (2009): “Gravity in the Weightless Economy”, Mimeo. Klenow, P. J., and A. Rodriguez-Clare (2005): “Externalities and Growth”, in Handbook of Economic Growth, ed. by P. Aghion, and S. Durlauf, vol. 1 of Handbook of Economic Growth, Chapter 11, pp. 817-861. Elsevier. Li, Y. (2009): “Borders and Distance in Knowledge Spillovers: Dying over Time or Dying with Age? - Evidence from Patent Citations”, CESifo Working Paper No. 2625. Peri, G. (2005): “Determinants of Knowledge Flows and Their Effect on Innovation”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(2), 308-322. Puga, D., and D. Trefler (2007): “Wake Up and Smell the Ginseng: International Trade and the Rise of Incremental Innovation in Low-Wage Countries”, NBER Working Papers 11571. Ramondo, N., and A. Rodriguez-Clare (2009): “Trade, Multinational Production, and the Gains from Openness”, NBER Working Papers 15604. Ramondo, N., and A. Rodriguez-Clare (2010): “Growth, Size, and Openness: A Quantitative Approach”, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings. Rodriguez-Clare, A. (2007): “Trade, Diffusion and the Gains from Openness”, NBER Working Papers 13662. Waugh, M. E. (2010): “International Trade and Income Differences,” American Economic Review, 100(5), 2093–2124. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/44422 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
International Trade, Technology Diffusion, and the Role of Diffusion Barriers. (deposited 20 Jun 2012 13:52)
- International Trade, Technology Diffusion, and the Role of Diffusion Barriers. (deposited 16 Feb 2013 14:09) [Currently Displayed]