Forgive, or Award, Your Debtor? - A Barrier Option Approach

Sun, David and Chow, Da-Ching (2014): Forgive, or Award, Your Debtor? - A Barrier Option Approach.

Abstract

We introduced in this study a model of sovereign debt with an embedded Down-and-In Put (DIP) to capture the discontinuity in sovereign debt pricing. This study suggests that debt forgiveness is a more effective solution in debt crisis, as repayment bonus or award or capital market exclusion penalty invites moral hazard and push up yields. Although a debtor’s current repayment capability reflects its current levels of repayment award, debt forgiveness or default threshold. While forgiveness works unconditionally, a debtor can only receive repayment award conditional on full debt repayment, which could result in unfavored consequences due to moral hazard. A creditor should therefore avoid offering repayment award to, or attempting to lower default threshold on, a debtor. Granting more forgiveness is, however, beneficial always. Overall, a strong GDP growth is still the most effective solution to lower long-run sovereign yields. Reexamining the argument of Krugman (1988) verifies that extra financing is indeed inferior to forgiveness. The forecasting errors in our model are only at fractions of those produced by other related studies, as our unscented Kalman filter procedure is free of potential econometric problems. Our model of default threshold for sovereign debt is more tractable than existing works in literature, especially in the calibration of sovereign yields under various debt load levels, economic cycles, time to maturity and forecasting capability. Our model can be applied in the operation of risk management, as well as portfolio investments, for investors of sovereign debt instruments.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Default risks, sovereign debt, government bonds, debt forgiveness, default threshold, fixed income, barrier option.
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C14 - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D81 - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D86 - Economics of Contract: Theory; F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance > F34 - International Lending and Debt Problems; G - Financial Economics > G0 - General > G01 - Financial Crises; G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G11 - Portfolio Choice ; Investment Decisions; G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G12 - Asset Pricing ; Trading Volume ; Bond Interest Rates

References

1. Andrade, S. C., (2009), “A Model of Asset Pricing under Country Risk,” Journal of InternationalMoney and Finance 28(4), 671–695.

2. Arellano, C., 2008, “Default Risk and Income Fluctuations in Emerging Economies,” American Economic Review 98(3), 690–712.

3. Baldi, P., Caramellino, L., & Iovino, M.G. (1999). Pricing general barrier options: a numerical approach using sharp large deviations, Mathematical Finance, 9, 293-322.

4. Barone-Adesi, G., Fusari, N. & Theal, J. (2008). Barrier option pricing using adjusted transition probabilities. Journal of Derivatives, Winter, 2008.

5. Bi, H., (2011). “Sovereign default risk premia, .scal limits, and .scal policy,” Working Paper 2011-10, Bank of Canada.

6. Black, F., and Scholes, M. (1973), "The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities," Journal of Political Economy 81,637-654.

7. Brockman P., and Turtle, H. J.. (2003). “A barrier option framework for corporate security valuation,” Journal of Financial Economics 67, 511-529.

8. Bulow, J,, and Rogoff, K.. (1989a), “A Constant Recontracting Model of Sovereign Debt” Journal of Political Economy 97, 155-178.

9. Bulow, J,, and Rogoff, K.. (1989b), “LDC Debt: Is to Forgive to Forget?” American Economic Review 79, 43-50. 10. Caner, M. and Hansen, B. E. (2004). “Instrumental Variable Estimation of a Threshold Model,” Econometric Theory 20, 813–843.

11. Duffie, D., L. Pedersen, and K. Singleton (2003). “Modeling Sovereign Yield Spreads: A Case Study of Russian Debt,” Journal of Finance 58, 119–160.

12. Eaton, J., Gersovitz, M., (1981). “Debt with potential repudiation: theoretical and empirical analysis,“ Review of Economic Studies 48(2), 289–309.

13. Gibson, R. and S. Sundaresan, (2001), “A Model of Sovereign Borrowing and Sovereign Yield Spreads,” Working Paper, Columbia University.

14. Giesecke, K. (2004). “Credit risk modeling and valuation: An Introduction,” Journal of Financial Risk Management 2(1), 1-40.

15. Guillard, M., and Kempf, H., (2012). “Defaulting on Sovereign Debt: A Macroeconomic Analysis,” Working Paper, University d’Evry val d’Essonne.

16. Hansen, B. E. (1999). “Threshold Effects in Non-Dynamic Panels: Estimation, Testing, and Inference,” Journal of Econometrics 93, 345–368.

17. Jeanneret, A.. (2012). “ The Dynamics of Sovereign Credit Risk,” EFA 2009 Bergen Meetings Paper.

18. Krugman, P., (1988). "Financing vs. Forgiving a Debt Overhang," Journal of Development Economics 29, 253-268.

19. Lin, W. T., and Sun, D. S.. (2009), “Are Credit Spreads Too Low or Too High? A Hybrid Barrier Option Approach for Financial Distress,” Journal of Futures Markets 29(12), 1161−1189.

20. Merton, R. C. (1973). Theory of rational option pricing, Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 4, 141-183.

21. Pan, J. and K. Singleton, (2008), “Default and Recovery Implicit in the Term Structure of Sovereign CDS Spreads,” Journal of Finance 63(5), 2345–2384.

22. Reiner, E., and Rubinstein, M. (1991), "Breaking Down the Barriers," Risk Magazine, 4(8).

23. Rich, , (1994), D.R. (1994), 1994): "The Mathematical Foundation of Barrier Option-Pricing Theory," Advances in Futures and Options Research, 7, 267-311.

24. Westphalen, M., (2002), “Valuation of Sovereign Debt with Strategic Defaulting and Rescheduling,” Working Paper, University of Lausanne.

25. Yue, V. Z., (2010), “Sovereign Default and Debt Renegotiation,” Journal of International Economics 80(2), 176–187.