Halkos, George (2011): Economy - environment relationship: The case of sulphur emissions. Published in: Journal of Environmental Planning and Management , Vol. 56, No. 2 (March 2013): pp. 159-177.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_45480.pdf Download (267kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper explores the relationship between economic development (in the form of GDP/c) and environmental pollution (in the form of sulphur emissions) by using a dynamic panel data for 97 countries for the time period 1950-2003. Various panel data econometric techniques are applied to a sample including only European Union (EU) countries and to a full sample including both the EU countries of the EU-countries sample, as well as, certain non-EU countries. The empirical results indicate significant differences between the two samples. For the case of the full sample, cross-country variation in the estimated slopes is observed, and parameters are extremely heterogeneous across countries making aggregate summarization not to be useful at all. However, the previous findings do not hold for the sample of the EU country members, resulting to the conclusion that policies to control pollution have to take into consideration both the specific economic situation and the structure of the industrial and the business sectors of each region. The last argument is even more important if someone takes into consideration transboundary pollution problems. Finally, in terms of policy implications, the study discusses the main options for sulphur emissions abatement.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Economy - environment relationship: The case of sulphur emissions |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Panel data analysis; sulphur emissions; economic development. |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C23 - Panel Data Models ; Spatio-temporal Models O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O10 - General O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O2 - Development Planning and Policy > O20 - General Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q50 - General Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth |
Item ID: | 45480 |
Depositing User: | G.E. Halkos |
Date Deposited: | 25 Mar 2013 03:14 |
Last Modified: | 08 Oct 2019 04:41 |
References: | Akbostanci E., Turut-Asik S., and Tunc G.I., (2009). The relationship between income and environment in Turkey: is there an environmental Kuznets curve, Energy Policy, 37: 861-867. Andreoni J. and Levinson A. (2001). The simple analytics of the environmental Kuznets curve, Journal of Public Economics, 80: 269-286 Anselin L. and Griffith, D. (1988). Do spatial effects really matter in regression analysis?, Papers of the Regional Science Association, 65: 11–34. Ansuategi A. (2003). Economic Growth and Transboundary Pollution in Europe: An Empirical Analysis, Environmental and Resource Economics, 26: 305–328. Ansuategi A., Barbier E.B. and Perrings C.A., (1998). The Environmental Kuznets Curve. In: Van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. and Hofkes, M.W. (Eds) Theory and Implementation of Economic Models for Sustainable Development, Kluwer. Arrow K., Bolin B., Costanza R.. Dasgupta P., Folke C., Holling C.S.Jansson B-O, Levin S., Maler K-G, Perrings C. and Pimentel D., (1995). Economic growth, carrying capacity and the environment, Science, 268: 520-521. Banerjee A., Marcellino M. and Osbat C. (2004). Some Cautions on the Use of Panel Methods for Integrated Series of Macro-Economic Data, Econometrics Journal, 7: 322-340. Barrett G.W. (1986). Methods for Reducing Emissions to Air Power Stations, Clean Air, 16(1): 1-14. Breitung J. (2000). The local power of some unit root tests for panel data, in B. Baltagi (ed.) Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration and Dynamic Panels, Advances in Econometrics, 15. JAI: Amsterdam. Camarero M., Gómez E., Tamarit C. (2011). Evidence of the Euro effect on trade estimating gravity equations with panel cointegration techniques. Accessible on: http://www.revecap.com/encuentros/trabajos/c/pdf/005.pdf Chuku A., (2011). Economic development and environmental quality in Nigeria: is there an environmental Kuznets curve?, MPRA Paper 30195, University Library of Munich, Germany. de Bruyn S.M. (1997). Explaining the Environmental Kuznets Curve: structural change and international agreements in reducing sulphur emissions, Environment and Development Economics, 2(4): 485-503. De Hoyos, R.E. and Sarafidis, V. (2006). Testing for cross-sectional dependence in panel-data models, The Stata Journal, 6: 482-496. Dijkgraaf E. and Vollebergh H.R.J. (2005). A test for parameter homogeneity in CO¬2 panel EKC estimates, Environmental and Resource Economics, 32: 229-239. Dinda S., Coondos D. and Pal M. (2000). Air quality and economic growth: an empirical study, Ecological Economics, 34: 409-423. Driskoll J.C. and Kraay A.C. (1998). Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data, Review of Economics and Statistics, 80: 549-560. Ekins P. (1997). The Kuznets curve for the environment and economic growth: examining the evidence, Environment and Planning A, 29: 805-830. Elsworth M. (1984). Acid rain, Pluto Press, London. Galeotti M., Lanza A. and Pauli F. (2006). Reassessing the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: a robustness exercise, Ecological economics, 57: 152-163. Grossman G. and Krueger A. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement, NBER Working Paper 3914, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge MA. Grossman G. and Krueger A. (1995). Economic growth and the Environment, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110: 353-377 Hadri K. (2000). Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data, Econometrics Journal, 3(2): 148-161. Halkos G.E. (1992). Economic perspectives of the acid rain problem in Europe. DPhil. thesis, Department of Economics and Related Studies, University of York, York, UK. Halkos G.E. (1993). Sulfur abatement policy: Implications of cost differentials. Energy Policy, 21(10):1035-1043. Halkos G.E. (1994). Optimal abatement of sulfur in Europe. Environmental and Resource Economics, 4(2):127-150. Halkos G. (1995). An evaluation of the direct cost of abatement under the main desulphurization technologies, Energy Sources, 17(4): 391-412. Halkos G.E. (2003a). Environmental Kuznets Curve for sulphur: Evidence using GMM estimation, Environment and Development Economics, 8: 581-601. Halkos G.E. and Salamouris D. (2003b). Socio-economic integration of ethnic Greeks from the former USSR: obstacles to entry into the Greek labour market, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 29(3): 519-534. Halkos G.E. and Tzeremes N.G. (2009). Economic efficiency and growth in the EU enlargement, Journal of Policy Modeling, 31(6): 847-862. Halkos G.E. and Tzeremes N. (2010). Measuring regional economic efficiency: the case of Greek prefectures, The Annals of Regional Science, 45(3): 603-632. Han X. and Chatterjee L. (1997). Impacts of growth and structural change on CO2 emissions of developing countries, World Development, 25: 395-407. Harris R.D.F. and Tzavalis E. (1999). Inference for unit roots in dynamic panels where the time dimension is fixed, Journal of Econometrics, 91: 201-226. He J. and Richard P. (2010). Environmemtal Kuznets curve for CO2 in Canada, Ecological Economics, 69: 1083-1093. Heerink N., Mulatu A. and Bulte E. (2001). Income inequality and the environment: aggregation bias in environmental Kuznets curves, Ecological Economics, 38: 359-367. Highton N.H. and Webb M.G. (1980). Sulphur dioxide from electricity generation: Policy options for pollution control, Energy Policy, March 1980, pp 61-76. Hildreth, C. and J. Houck (1968), ‘Some estimators for a linear model with random coefficients’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 63: 584-595 Hsiao C. (1986). Analysis of panel data, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK. Hsiao C, Pesaran MH and Tahmiscioglu AK (1999). Bayes estimation of short-run coefficients in dynamic panel data models. In: Hsiao C, Lahiri K, Lee L-F, Pesaran MH (eds) Analysis of panels and limited dependent variable models. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp.268-296. Im K.S., Pesaran M.H. and Shin Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels, Journal of Econometrics, 115: 53-74. Jaeger W. (1998). A theoretical basis for the environmental inverted-U curve and implications for international trade, Williams College, Working Paper. Jones L.E. and Manuelli R.E. (1995). A positive model of growth and pollution controls, NBER, Working Paper 5205. Judge, G.G., R.C. Hill, W.G. Griffiths, H. Lutkepohl and T.C. Lee (1988), Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Econometrics, 2nd Ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kao C. (1999). Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data, Journal of Econometrics, 90: 1–44. Kuznets S. (1955). Economic Growth and Income Inequality, American Economic Review, 45(1): 1-28. Levin A., Lin C.F. and Chu, C.S. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties, Journal of Econometrics, 108: 1-24. Lopez R. (1994). The environment as a factor of production: the effects of economic growth and trade liberalization, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27: 163-184. Maddala G.S., Trost R.P., Li H, Joutz F. (1997). Estimation of short-run and long-run elasticities of energy demand from panel data using shrinkage estimator, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 15: 90-100. Markandya A., Golub A. and Pedroso-Galinato S. (2006). Empirical analysis of national income and SO 2 emissions in selected European countries, Environmental and Resource Economics, 35: 221-257. Mazzanti M. and Musolesi A. (2011). Income and time related effects in EKC, Working Papers 201105, University of Ferrara, Department of Economics. McConnell K.E. (1997). Income and demand for environmental quality, Environment and Development Economics, 2: 383-399 McCoskey S. and Kao C. (1998). A residual-based test of the null of cointegration in panel data, Econometric Reviews, 17(1): 57-84. Mundlak Y. (1978). On the pooling of time series and cross section data, Econometrica, 46: 69-85. O' Connell P.G.J. (1998). The overvaluation of the purchasing power parity, Journal of International Economics, 44: 1-19. Panayotou, T. (1993), ‘Empirical Tests and Policy Analysis of Environmental Degradation at Different Stages of Economic Development’, Working Paper WP238, Technology and Employment Programme, International Labour Office, Geneva. Panayotou T. (1997). Demystifying the environmental Kuznets curve: turning a black box into a policy tool, Environment and Development Economics, 2(4): 465-484. Panayotou, T., 2003. Economic growth and the environment. Presented at the Spring Seminar of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Geneva. Accessible on line: http://213.174.196.126/ead/pub/032/032_c2.pdf Pedroni P. (1999). Critical values for cointegrating tests in heterogeneous panel with multiple refressors, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61: 653–678. Pedroni P. (2000). Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels, Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration and Dynamic Panels, 15: 93-130. Pedroni P.L. (2004). Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the purchasing power parity hypothesis, Econometric Theory, 20: 597- 625. Persyn D. and Westerlund J. (2008). Error-correction-based cointegration tests for panel data, The Stata Journal, 8: 232-241. Pesaran M.H. and Smith R. (1995). Estimating Long-run Relationships from Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels, Journal of Econometrics, 68: 79-113. Pesaran M.H., Shin Y. and Smith R. (1999). Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94: 621-634. Pesaran M.H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. CESifo Working Papers, No. 1229. Pesaran M.H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross section dependence, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22: 265-312. Regens J.L. and Rycroft R.W. (1988). The Acid Rain Controversy, University of Pittsburgh Press. Roca J., Padilla E., Farre M. and Galletto V. (2001). Economic growth and atmospheric pollution in Spain: discussing the environmental Kuznets hypothesis, Ecological Economics, 39: 85-99. Rothman D. (1998). Environmental Kuznets curves – real progress or passing over the buck?, Ecological Economics, 25: 177–94. Shafik N. and Bandyopadhyay S. (1992). Economic growth and environmental quality: time series and cross-country evidence, Background paper for the World Development Report 1992, The World Bank, Washington DC. Stern D.I., Common M.S. and Barbier E.B. (1996). Economic growth and the environmental degradation: the environmental Kuznets Curve and sustainable development, World Development, 24: 1151-1160. Stern D.I. and Common M.S. (2001). Is there an environmental Kuznets curve for sulphur?, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 41: 162-178. Rock M.T. (1996). Pollution intensity of GDP and trade policy: can the World Bank be wrong?, World Development, 24: 471-479. Scruggs L.A. (1998). Political and economic inequality and the environment, Ecological Economics, 26: 259-275. Stokey N.L. (1998). Are there limits to growth?, International Economic Review, 39: 1-31 Suri V. and Chapman D. (1998). Economic growth, trade and energy: implications for the environmental Kuznets curve, Ecological Economics, 25: 195-208 Swamy P.A.V.B. (1970). Efficient inference in a random coefficient regression model, Econometrica, 38: 311-323. Torras M. and Boyce J.K. (1998). Income, inequality and pollution: a reassessment of the environmental Kuznets curve, Ecological Economics, 25: 147-160. UNECE (1982). Draft Report on technologies for controlling sulphur emissions: technical efficiency and costs. ENV/WP.1/R.57. UN Economic and Social Council Economic Commission for Europe, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Geneva. Westerlund J. (2007). Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 69: 709-748. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/45480 |