Keynesianismo, Poskeynesianismo y Nuevokeynesianismo: ¿Tres doctrinas diferentes y una sóla teoría verdadera?

León Díaz, John Jairo (2007): Keynesianismo, Poskeynesianismo y Nuevokeynesianismo: ¿Tres doctrinas diferentes y una sóla teoría verdadera?

Abstract

During the seventies, Keynesianism faced the most critical decade. It was characterized by some deep critics to the "General Theory", due to the ausence of strong microfoundations and a overdimensionated importance of demand shocks over the role of supply shock in economic theory.

Eighties unleash the beginning of a new authors stream; it has as a main purpose to develop an answer to all those critics made during the past decade. In such way, a new stream named the newkeynesianism had appeared.

On the other side, the Postkeynesianism seemed to be far from the critics. It was supossed to be the next step in Keynesianism theory, since its major effort was to provide a framework for the analysis of long run economics, just like a growth theory.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Institution: Universidad Nacional de Colombia
• English Title: Keynesianism, PostKeynesianism and Newkeynesianism: ¿Three different doctrines just one real theory?
• Language: Spanish
• Keywords: Keynesianismo; Poskeynesianismo; Nuevokeynesianismo
• Subjects: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B2 - History of Economic Thought since 1925 > B20 - General; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B51 - Socialist ; Marxian ; Sraffian; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B2 - History of Economic Thought since 1925 > B25 - Historical ; Institutional ; Evolutionary ; Austrian; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B3 - History of Economic Thought: Individuals > B30 - General

References

[1] Barro, R.J. New Classicals And Keynesians, Or The Good Guys And The Bad Guys. RCER Working Papers 187, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER). 1989. [2] Benetti, C. La estructura L´ogica de la Teor´ıa General de Keynes. Cuadernos de Economía, V XIX. 2000. [3] Blumme, H. Economía Post-Keynesiana. Alfred S. Eichnner. 1984. [4] Caceres, J. La Teoría General de Keynes y su pertinencia para el caso colombiano. Lecturas de Economía, No 23. 1987. [5] Caplan, B. The Critics of Keynesianism: A Survey. Economic Notes No 76. 1997. [6] Davidson, P. International Money and Real World. Macmillan, London. 1982. [7] Davidson, P. Setting the Record Straight on A History of Post Keynesian Economics. Journal of Postkeynesian Economics, Vol 26 No 2, 2003-4. [8] Davidson, P. Responses to Lavoie, King, and Dow on what Post Keynesianism is and who is a Post Keynesian. Journal of Postkeynesian Economics, Vol 27 No 3, 2005. [9] Eichner, A. y Kregel. J. An Essay of Post-Keynesian Theory: A New Paradigm in Economics. Journal of Economic Literature. December, 1975. 3 [10] Fazzari, S. Asymmetric Information and Keynesian Theories of Investment.. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics. Vol. 6 No 3. 1994. [11] Friedman, M. John Maynard Keynes. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Economic Quarterly Volume 83/2. 1997. [12] Gordon, R. What is New Keynesian Economics?. Journal of Economic Literature. Vol 28 No 3, 1990. [13] Harrod, M. Hacía una Economía dinámica. Ed. Tecnos, Madrid. 1948. [14] Kaldor, M.Ensayos sobre el valor y la distribución. Ed. Tecnos, Madrid. 1973. [15] Kalecki, M.Political Aspects of Full Employment. Political Quarterly. 1943. [16] King, J.E. A History of Post Keynesian Economics since 1936. Edward Elgar. 2002. [17] King, J.E. Unwarping the record: a reply to Paul Davidson. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics. Vol 27 No 3, 2005. [18] King, R. Will the New Keynesian Macroeconomics Resurrect the ISLM Model. Journal of Economic Perspectives. Vol 7 No 1, 1993. [19] Lavoie, M. Changing definitions: a comment on Davidson’s critique of King’s history of Post Keynesianism. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics. Vol 27 No 3, 2005.