Развитие методологии предварительного финансового контроля государственных программ регионов России

Bratanova, Alexandra (2012): Развитие методологии предварительного финансового контроля государственных программ регионов России. Published in: Financial analytics: problems and solutions No. 42 (1 November 2012): pp. 23-30.

Abstract

Shift to the program planning and budgeting is a budget policy priority in Russia. However, the current system of public programs development and implementation needs to be improved. The research aims at development of methodological approaches for a priori financial control of public programs based on international best practice of the evaluation theory and implementation. Author has formed criteria and algorithm of the evaluation method choice for Russian regional public programs. The algorithm is showing a new approach to address a problem of methodological support of program financial and economic analysis in Russia. It also has a practical significance for public administration.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: Development of the methodology of public programs a priori financial control for Russian regions
• Language: Russian
• Keywords: program planning and budgeting, public program, financial and economic analysis, project evaluation, cost-benefit analysis, multi-criteria analysis
• Subjects: G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services > G28 - Government Policy and Regulation; H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies; H - Public Economics > H6 - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt > H61 - Budget ; Budget Systems

References

1. On budget policy in 2013-2015: Budget Message of the President of the Russian Federation.

2. On the budget of Moscow city for 2012 and planned period of 2013 and 2014: Law of Moscow city of 07.12.2011 № 62.

3. Bratanova A.V. Analysis of the key elements of the program planning budgeting implementation in Russian regions (Moscow case study) // International youth scientific forum “Lomonosov-2011” proceedings” / Edited A.I. Andreev, A.V. Andrianov, E.A. Antipov, M.V. Chistyakova. [electronic resource] – M.: MAKS Press, 2011.

4. Campbell H., Brown R. Benefit-Cost Analysis. Financial and Economic Appraisal using Spreadsheets. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 2003. 345 р.

5. Impact Assessment Guidelines. European Commission. 2009. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/governance/impact/commission_guidelines/docs/iag_2009_en.pdf (retrieved: 22.05.2011).

6. Council of Australian Governments. Best Practice Regulation. A Guide for Ministerial Councils and National Standard Setting Bodies. 2007. URL: http://www.finance.gov.au/obpr/docs/COAG_best_practice_guide_2007.pdf (retrieved: 05.08.2011).

7. Finnveden G., Nilsson M., Johansson J., Persson A., Moberg A., Carlsson T. Strategic environmental assessment methodologics — applications within the energy sector // Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2003. № 23. P. 91–123.

8. Multi-criteria analysis: a manual. London: Department for Communities and Local Government. 2009. URL: http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/corporate/multicriteriaanalysismanual (retrieved: 12.12.2011).

9. Prabhu R., Colfer C. J. P., Dudley R. G. Guidelines for Developing, Testing and Selecting Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management // Center for International Forestry Research. 1999.

10. Haralambopoulos D., Polatidis H. Renewable energy projects: structuring a multi-criteria group decision-making framework // Renewable Energy. 2003. № 28(6). Р. 961–973.