Rehman, Zeeshan Rehman and Herani, Gobind M. and Mugheri, Saleem (2010): Factor Identifying Employees’ Workplace Conflict and Timely Resolution. Published in: Indus Journal of Management & Social Sciences No. 4(2) (31 December 2010): pp. 103-111.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_46711.pdf Download (466kB) | Preview |
Abstract
There are multiple factors which are affecting the performance of employees in which interpersonal conflict becomes a root cause of barriers in flow of organizational operations. Workplace conflict based on the people’s ideas, what they are considering important for the organization. This study emphasis towards the necessary changes in behavior of employees at different job position levels. Narrative research analysis proposed the triangulation model that based upon the identification, manage and reflection towards the workplace conflict. This study also highlight that the wrong practices of conflict management bring the challenging situation for the achievement of desires goals. In resultant, workplace conflicts minimize the performance of the individual, as well as leave the negative impact in front of clientele. The results and findings elaborate that the conflicts are continuously attributed as the negative and destructive point among the workers. Workplace conflict can be overwhelmed via focusing towards the non-verbal communication and leadership control.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Factor Identifying Employees’ Workplace Conflict and Timely Resolution |
English Title: | Factor Identifying Employees’ Workplace Conflict and Timely Resolution |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Conflict management, Employee behavior, Relationship management. |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D74 - Conflict ; Conflict Resolution ; Alliances ; Revolutions J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J5 - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J5 - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining > J53 - Labor-Management Relations ; Industrial Jurisprudence L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L14 - Transactional Relationships ; Contracts and Reputation ; Networks |
Item ID: | 46711 |
Depositing User: | Gobind M. Herani |
Date Deposited: | 16 Mar 2014 10:22 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 01:35 |
References: | Amason, A. C. 1996. Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision-making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams, Academy of Management Journal, 39(1):123-48. Ancona, D. G. and D. F. Caldwell. 1992. Demography and Design: Predictions of New Product Team Performance. Organization Science, 3(2):321-41. Bazerman, M.H., J. R. Curhan and D. A. Moore. 2001. The Death and Rebirth of the Social Psychology of Negotiation. in Clark, M. and Fletcher, G. (Eds), Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 196-228. Carnevale, P.J. and D. G. Pruitt. 1992. Negotiation and Mediation. Annual Review of Psychology, 43:531-82. De Dreu, C.K.W. and L. R. Weingart. 2003. Task Versus Relationship Conflict, Team Performance and Team Member Satisfaction: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88:741-9. Deutsch, M. 1980. Fifty years of conflict, in Festinger, L. (Ed.), Retrospections on Social Psychology. Oxford University Press, New York; NY: 46-77. Fritz, R. 1999. The Path of Least Resistance for Managers, San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers. Gioia, D.A., A. Donnellon, and H. P. Sims. 1989. Communication and Cognition in Appraisal: A Tale of Two Paradigms. Organization Studies, 10(4):503-29. Jehn, K. and E. Mannix. 2001. The Dynamic Nature of Conflict: A Longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and Group Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2):238-51. Jehn, K.A. 1995. A Multi Method Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict, Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(2):256-82. Kirkbride, P.S., F. Y. Tang, and R.I. Westwood. 1991. Chinese Conflict Preferences and Negotiating Behavior: Cultural and Psychological Influence. Organization Studies, 12(3):365-89. Lewicki, R.J. and J. Litterer. 1985. Irwin, Homewood, IL: Negotiation. Lewicki, J.R., B. Barry, M.D. Saunders, and W.J. Minton. 2003. Essentials of Negotiation. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Irwin. Ma, Z. 2006. Conflict Styles as Indicators of Behavioral Pattern in Business Negotiations. paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Atlanta, GA. Milliken, F. and L. Martins. 1996. Searching for Common Threads: Understanding the Multiple Effects of Diversity in Organizational Groups. Academy of Management Review, 21(2):402-33. Orford, J. 1986. The Rules of Interpersonal Complementarities: Does Hostility Beget Hostility and Dominance, Submission? Psychological Review, 93:365-77. Parayitam, S. and R.S. Dooley. 2007. The Relationship between Conflict and Decision Outcomes: the Moderating Role of Affect and Cognition-based Trust in Strategic Decision Making Teams. International Journal of Conflict Management, 18(1):42-73. Perkins, D. 2003. King Arthur’s Round Table: How Collaborative Conversations Create Smart Organizations, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons. Thomas, K.W. 1976. Conflict and Conflict Management, in Dunnette, M.D. (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Chicago, IL, Rand McNally: 889-935. Thomas, K.W. 1992. Conflict and Negotiation Processes in Organizations, in Dunnette, M.D. and Hough, L.M. (Eds), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Chicago, IL: Rand McNally, 651-717. Tjosvold, D. 2006. Special Commentary, Defining Conflict and Making Choices about its Management Lighting the Dark Side of Organizational Life. International Journal of Conflict Management, 17(2):87-95. Storey, J. 1992. HRM in action: The Truth is out at Last. Personnel Management, 24: 28-31. Wall, J.A. and M.W. Blum. 1991. Negotiations, Journal of Management, 17:273-303. Yukl, G. and B. Tracey. 1992. Consequences of Influence Tactics Used with Subordinates, Peers, and Superiors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77:5. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/46711 |